Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

okaawhatever

(9,565 posts)
Tue Mar 11, 2014, 11:47 AM Mar 2014

Ukraine Secession Referendum Does Not Have a ‘No’ Option [View all]

Crimea, which voted to put the question of secession from Ukraine to a referendum, has released a ballot with severely limited choices, and all of the options come with strings attached

“No” is not an option in the upcoming referendum in Crimea on whether to split from Ukraine.

The Crimean parliament—which voted to put the question to a referendum Thursday, despite opposition from the new Ukrainian government and from the United States—has released the ballot for the March 16 on its website. The referendum gives voters in the autonomous region the option to secede from Ukraine and join Russia, or to return to policies that give Crimea even greater autonomy from Kiev—opening the door to join Russia down the line, the regional English-language news source KyivPost reports. But the status quo is not an option.

The two questions, written in Russian, Ukrainian, and Crimean Tatar, ask:

“Do you support joining Crimea with the Russian Federation as a citizen of the Russian Federation?”’
“Do you support restoration of 1992 Crimean Constitution and Crimea’s status as a part of Ukraine?”

Voters are asked to put a check next to one of the questions, and ballots without a check are considered illegitimate.

Copy of Ballot:
http://www.rada.crimea.ua/textdoc/ru/6/act/1702pr.pdf

Article from Time:
http://time.com/16318/ukraine-crimea-referendum-russia/

25 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Palm Beach County 2000, Eat your heart out. nt Tommy_Carcetti Mar 2014 #1
What would a "No" option represent?... SidDithers Mar 2014 #2
Sigh. Russia, Yes or No? Restoration of 1992-constitution, Yes or No? DetlefK Mar 2014 #3
And if someone answers no to both questions?... SidDithers Mar 2014 #4
There are two options: geek tragedy Mar 2014 #12
Yeah, I see that now... SidDithers Mar 2014 #13
A no option would be to keep things as they are now. They don't have that option. Not only that okaawhatever Mar 2014 #5
2 isn't a status quo selection. riqster Mar 2014 #6
Can someone explain why the second choice isn't the status quo? LittleBlue Mar 2014 #7
Repeating what someone else posted: okaawhatever Mar 2014 #9
That seems like a stretch LittleBlue Mar 2014 #10
The 1992 constitution was abolished by Ukraine. Xithras Mar 2014 #11
Keep in mind that, historically, the Ukrainians have been the bullies here. Xithras Mar 2014 #8
The OPs post is inaccurate. go west young man Mar 2014 #14
I assure you, Time knows what it's doing. The point of the article is that there isn't a "no" okaawhatever Mar 2014 #15
The 2nd option keeps the status quo go west young man Mar 2014 #16
Time is a weekly news magazine that is almost one hundred years old and has a readership of okaawhatever Mar 2014 #18
You didn't specify the magazine. go west young man Mar 2014 #23
I disagree. Newsweek jumped the shark when the maybe-they're-moonies people bought them out. I okaawhatever Mar 2014 #24
This is what they call a "fait accompli." reformist2 Mar 2014 #17
Well, like Yogi Berra said, "It ain't over 'til it's over." nt okaawhatever Mar 2014 #20
KIck Cha Mar 2014 #19
Don't worry the new Ukranain government is working things out. go west young man Mar 2014 #21
And this is East Ukraine yesterday. go west young man Mar 2014 #22
Video of the moment go west young man Mar 2014 #25
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Ukraine Secession Referen...