Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)George Bush Lost an Entire Generation for the Republican Party [View all]
http://www.motherjones.com/kevin-drum/2014/03/george-bush-lost-entire-generation-republican-partyGeorge Bush Lost an Entire Generation for the Republican Party
By Kevin Drum
Pew has released a new survey about the social and political attitudes of various generations, and it makes for interesting reading. The thing that strikes me the most is just how clear the trends are. Each successive generation is more politically independent; more religiously independent; less likely to be married in their 20s; less trusting of others; less likely to self-ID as patriotic; and less opposed to gay rights. There's virtually no overlap at all. It's just a smooth, straight progression.
But the single most interesting chart in the report is one that doesn't show this smooth progression. You've probably seen this before from other sources, but the chart on the right basically shows that for the past 40 years voting patterns haven't differed much by age. In fact, there's virtually no difference between generations at all until you get to the George Bush era. At that point, young voters suddenly leave the Republican Party en masse. Millennials may be far less likely than older generations to say there's a big difference between Republicans and Democrats, but their actual voting record belies that.

Whatever it was that Karl Rove and George Bush didand there are plenty of possibilities, ranging from Iraq to gays to religionthey massively alienated an entire generation of voters. Sure, they managed to squeak out a couple of presidential victories, but they did it at the cost of losing millions of voters who will probably never fully return. This chart is their legacy in a nutshell.
65 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
but blatant redistricting "saved" them in congress for many years, it would seem
SoCalDem
Mar 2014
#5
& therein (Shrub "lost entire generation") is the entire content of "hope and change"
UTUSN
Mar 2014
#27
Probably due to millennials having friends killed and wounded due to the war on terror.
Crowman1979
Mar 2014
#40
Hopefully they'll know that Reaganomics was disaster and has done more harm than good >
YOHABLO
Mar 2014
#41
Might the facts of the DUBYA dynasty be forever chiseled into the granite throughout this
bkanderson76
Mar 2014
#42
George HW Bush did it for me. HOWEVER, the DEMS are fast losing me, too.
blkmusclmachine
Mar 2014
#43
They're counting on voter suppression and gerrymandering to make up for that (eom)
StevieM
Mar 2014
#44
This is good, but Dems have yet to achieve anything great yet as a result of this Repug decline.
reformist2
Mar 2014
#50
When you practically take down the whole world, after awhile, people start to notice:
Jefferson23
Mar 2014
#61
You ask "why don't Democrat elected politicians support Obama better? "
muriel_volestrangler
Mar 2014
#65