Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Ronan Farrow: Awesome on Twitter, Awful on Television [View all]
http://variety.com/2014/voices/columns/ronan-farrows-awesome-social-media-resume-isnt-translating-well-to-his-msnbc-gig-1201129676/Andrew Wallenstein
Editor-in-chief: Digital
@awallenstein
Ronan Farrow has the kind of resume thats difficult to match. He graduated from college at the tender age of 15; went on to collect degrees from Yale Law School and Oxford U., the latter on a Rhodes scholarship; and worked at the U.S. House Committee on Foreign Affairs and for the Obama administration.
Impressive as all that is, none of those credentials finishes among the top three reasons MSNBC gave him his own show last month. In ascending order, they are: the endless promotional value that comes with his being the progeny of Mia Farrow; his movie-star good looks; and most important of all hes awesome on Twitter.
That may sound trivial, but to think otherwise is naive. There are plenty of policy wonks out there with resumes that can fill a phone book, but very few of them boast a built-in audience on the strength of their online personality.
Farrow somehow manages to be a combination of funny, charming or insightful in every single tweet without the usual mistake Twitter stars make: They just plain overdo it.
Which makes it all the more mystifying that MSNBCs savvy move to bring him to TV has turned out to be such a dud, drawing mostly negative reviews.
Its an interesting test case in the tricky translation to a different platform of a star best known in social media. The logic behind making such a conversion seems as sound as it is simple: Bringing over someone with a powerful direct connection to 238,000 followers gives a TV show a running start in the ratings. But somewhere on the way to TV, Farrows appeal got lost.
?w=670&h=377&crop=1
24 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Could it be that mastering the 140-character tweet doesn't mean you're ready to host
stopbush
Mar 2014
#2
Hopefully he'll find his way. He has the various pieces to be a great talent, but they haven't been
okaawhatever
Mar 2014
#11
Then the award should be named after a PRINT newsperson maybe? Foreign Policy Magazine? Really?
cherokeeprogressive
Mar 2014
#18
