Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Why is it *my* #%^*ing fault? [View all]pragmatic_dem
(410 posts)106. Clinton is heir apparent, it has been written by tribal elders...
maybe she'll run against Jeb Bush or Lynn Cheney.
As a nation maybe we don't handle change very well.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
260 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
The "Ralph Nader! Ralph Nader!" parrots never seem to remember that Bushco cheated
winter is coming
Mar 2014
#2
The Nader loyalists never seem to remember that an event can have more than one cause.
Jim Lane
Mar 2014
#71
I'm not defending Nader against his detractors. I've always thought he was a blowhard.
winter is coming
Mar 2014
#95
Actually, a lot of people on DU vilify Nader as if that were the only thing.
winter is coming
Mar 2014
#117
Exactly, so Nader never was a factor, was he, as you pointed out. We lost that election also.
sabrina 1
Mar 2014
#220
Gore DID win. And had it not been for the SC traitors, he would have taken his rightful
sabrina 1
Mar 2014
#257
The SC stole the 2000 election, and yet, there are those who defend the SC felonious
sabrina 1
Mar 2014
#207
Actually, you don't know that. It's possible that Nader would have been a factor, but not certain.
winter is coming
Mar 2014
#112
Which begs the question of why so many voters made "the wrong choice".
winter is coming
Mar 2014
#118
"Stole" is a word I've actually heard people use, even if you haven't.
winter is coming
Mar 2014
#133
... or people realized between 2000 and 2004 just how much Bush sucked, or they
winter is coming
Mar 2014
#130
Yes he did. But would it have been possible without Nader? I don't think so. NT
Adrahil
Mar 2014
#131
Then there's the voter purges in Florida done by Jeb Bush and Katherine Harris
deutsey
Mar 2014
#137
The polling at the time showed that Nader took 2 to 5 times the number of votes from Gore vs Bush
Gothmog
Mar 2014
#194
I read the article. Like Cook, you're ignoring the fact that we lost far more votes to Bush
winter is coming
Mar 2014
#208
And a *fraction* of the votes lost to Bush would have also elected Gore.
winter is coming
Mar 2014
#216
The votes lost to Nader are the votes that could be documented and accounted for
Gothmog
Mar 2014
#219
The SCOTUS only had the opportunity to rule in Bush v. Gore due to bush's lead
Gothmog
Mar 2014
#240
That speaks to Nader's motives. It still doesn't make him the sole villain.
winter is coming
Mar 2014
#226
there was a major civil rights issue also, which never seems to garner much concern
G_j
Mar 2014
#156
I agree that we need to work on 2014, but my democratic congressman has a very, very secure
JDPriestly
Mar 2014
#52
Getting the teabaggers out is primarily the job of Democrats living in the teabaggers' districts.
JDPriestly
Mar 2014
#60
My goal is to vote for someone who seems to represent my interests. Screw the "lesser of two evils",
GoneFishin
Mar 2014
#5
Got that right. If the party wants to win it better put up a populist candidate because I'm done
Ed Suspicious
Mar 2014
#13
So, you will feel sufficiently represented by a contributor on MSNBC?
Sen. Walter Sobchak
Mar 2014
#33
I'm always entertained by the paradoxically elastic size of "the left".
winter is coming
Mar 2014
#15
Are you FUCKING series???? Neither "Bernie nor Elizabeth" EVER FUCKING ran against
madinmaryland
Mar 2014
#16
One thing is true, who ever wins the Democratic nomination, will run against the rethug. If Bernie,
lostincalifornia
Mar 2014
#57
Can you explain if the Third Way really want Republicans to win? They offer nothing that the Republ
rhett o rick
Mar 2014
#32
In Florida 24,000 Democrats voted for Nader, 308,000 Democrats voted for Bush.
pragmatic_dem
Mar 2014
#35
So you believe that a political monopoly is best for all, unlike corporate monopolies? I don't...
pragmatic_dem
Mar 2014
#56
Bush, won twice. Is that Nader's fault? Democratic leadership is responsible. It's their job.
pragmatic_dem
Mar 2014
#68
But 300,000 Democrats in Florida voted for Bush, not Nader. Why not blame them? Or Dem leadeship or
pragmatic_dem
Mar 2014
#79
And you seem to be deflecting blame for failure away from Democratic leadership
pragmatic_dem
Mar 2014
#86
Clinton left office with the highest approval ratings of any president in years.
Beacool
Mar 2014
#191
Clinton's approval was so high, 300,000 FL democrats voted for Bush. That's why Gore lost. Blame
pragmatic_dem
Mar 2014
#244
Possible - PMRC was a cluster-fk, unwelcome invasion of hard right wing into democratic party
pragmatic_dem
Mar 2014
#245
The people who feel disenfranchised by their own party don't seem to feel that
winter is coming
Mar 2014
#190
I don't know what to tell them. They can't see the results? What's happened to this country?
kcr
Mar 2014
#192
Agree +1 for standing up for traditional Democratic values and not this watered
pragmatic_dem
Mar 2014
#249
I assure you the self-proclaimed liberal who didn't vote for anyone did FAR
pragmatic_dem
Mar 2014
#248
WWP supports the North Korean Govt, Gore would have lost badly nationally if he tried
JI7
Mar 2014
#58
right, however, you can blame them just as much as Nader, but not as much as Democrats themselves...
pragmatic_dem
Mar 2014
#73
Dems who voted for Bush wanted someone right wing, just like WWP wanted someone who supports North
JI7
Mar 2014
#75
Nader is stiff and wooden, Gore has a sense of humor and is very affectionate with people
JI7
Mar 2014
#97
it was the right wing that kept going on about Gore being stiff and wooden and you are
JI7
Mar 2014
#104
no, Gore always had a sense of Humor, it was the right wing and media whores who kept
JI7
Mar 2014
#107
I saw the 2000 debates. He didn't comes across as personable and relaxed, which was a shame. n/t
winter is coming
Mar 2014
#114
he beat Bush in the debate so the media and right wing started going on about how mean he was
JI7
Mar 2014
#116
If Gore only sang "If I only had a brain" over & over, I wouldn't have voted for him
pragmatic_dem
Mar 2014
#254
That's a very conservative view you have. Having a committee decide what is safe
pragmatic_dem
Mar 2014
#90
certainly the ratings today favor violence over sex, and pmrc was a commitee
pragmatic_dem
Mar 2014
#110
So you admit Tipper was an asshole for fighting on an unimportant issue too?
Fumesucker
Mar 2014
#170
KCR, you're assuming that all 2000 voters were as well-informed as you are.
beerandjesus
Mar 2014
#258
Because if the Third Way loses they have to look for a job in the economy they created by policy.
jtuck004
Mar 2014
#42
That is about how I read it. If some people could stake themselves to a cross, they would. nt
bluestate10
Mar 2014
#218
There is a primary process, as much as some people may wish for an automatic coronation.
Warren DeMontague
Mar 2014
#66
If the Democratic Party wants the votes of the left, it has to run leftist candidates.
Tierra_y_Libertad
Mar 2014
#70
By that logic, if they want the votes of centrist voters they should run centrist candidates...
brooklynite
Mar 2014
#135
as we can see from the responses ("participating in democracy just sabotages it!" "I don't CARE
MisterP
Mar 2014
#74
Everyone knows a monopoly of power best serves the majority of citizens, just ask China
pragmatic_dem
Mar 2014
#138
While I disagree with you on Hillary I think you should say how you feel on Warren and
hrmjustin
Mar 2014
#92
McGovern and Mondale ran against incumbents. Not really surprising they lost.
winter is coming
Mar 2014
#120
Dukakis was leading until that debate question on death penalty, and Clinton ran against an
JI7
Mar 2014
#121
Clinton ran against someone who had broken his "no new taxes" promise.
winter is coming
Mar 2014
#122
I have yet to discover what's pragmatic about continually favoring corporations over people.
winter is coming
Mar 2014
#183
Indeed. But what we want to be true will only happen if we take steps to make it so.
Maedhros
Mar 2014
#149
Wow MannyGoldstein you sure know how to bring the “neo” out of the liberals.
fleabiscuit
Mar 2014
#237