Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

magical thyme

(14,881 posts)
9. We all would.
Wed Mar 12, 2014, 11:08 AM
Mar 2014

I would not want to be in that CEO's shoes. There are powerful ethical considerations involved. The drug has not be tested or tried in children, so no data on dosing, etc. There is nothing that says it won't kill the boy before his disease does. When they pull the limited supply out of the planned testing, it slows down FDA approval, which means that one or more lives who could be saved down the road won't be, and that is based on a gamble.

At least by putting within the context of a trial, regardless of this outcome, the information learned will go toward saving additional lives down the road.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Drug company will give ai...»Reply #9