General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Why is it *my* #%^*ing fault? [View all]Gothmog
(179,405 posts)The polling is clear. Nader cost Gore more than enough votes to swing the races in Florida and New Hampshire. If Nader was not in the race or if Nader had not been determined to be an ass, we would not have bush in the office. This is a simple case of "but for" causation (or proximate cause to use the legal concept). But for Nader's stupidity and arrogance, Al Gore would have won both Florida and New Hampshire. The fact that other factors could have caused Gore to win is meaningless in that the only factor that matters is the fact that Nader cost Gore the election. Your analysis is based on speculation and the facts that in the real world the proximate cause of Gore's defeat was Nader's stupidity and arrogance.
I am serious when I keep repeating that due to Nader, we are stuck with Citizen's United and the gutting of the Voting Rights Act. I am scrambling to try to organize voter id clinics in Texas to attempt to undo the damage done by Nader. If a GOP candidate wins in 2016, we can kiss Roe v. Wade and the right to privacy goodbye.