General Discussion

HereSince1628

(36,063 posts)

6. What has been revealled is that oversight was supposed to be a charade

Thu Mar 13, 2014, 07:57 AM

Mar 2014

The CIA controlled the review, tried to obsfuscate with a blizzard of documents, and monitored the committee staff as they laboriously searched for snowdrifts in the whiteout.

Somehow, somebody slipped the Internal Paneta review into the forest of documents and it was discovered, and it was removed.

The National Security apparatus clearly considers itself beyond the reach of the elected, and clearly has the desire escape oversight.

What is revealed is that the CIA apparently intends to allow no credible inquiry.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

66 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

A few questions as follow-up to Dianne Feinstein's Statment on the CIA [View all] Scuba Mar 2014 OP

Great questions. Waiting to see the answers from others. Nt newfie11 Mar 2014 #1

I fear we are about to learn a terrible lesson HereSince1628 Mar 2014 #2

Can anyone imagine a decent creditable Sen Church type inquiry Ichingcarpenter Mar 2014 #4

What has been revealled is that oversight was supposed to be a charade HereSince1628 Mar 2014 #6

I agree a charade some are saying Ichingcarpenter Mar 2014 #9

great discussion between marci wheeler and brad questionseverything Mar 2014 #35

Yeah, stalling 'til the election makes sense. But I think the torture will play second fiddle ... Scuba Mar 2014 #38

+1 nt LiberalEsto Mar 2014 #46

I don't know how the Committees work but I don't think the Senate itself records the votes struggle4progress Mar 2014 #3

Good work. n/t ProSense Mar 2014 #21

Interesting thanks.. 2banon Mar 2014 #29

Thanks for digging all this out. Good addition to the thread. Scuba Mar 2014 #33

Congress holds the CIA purse strings. idendoit Mar 2014 #5

I think it is naive to believe Congress controls all the CIA's money HereSince1628 Mar 2014 #8

Like drug smuggling. Enthusiast Mar 2014 #11

Among others, yes. HereSince1628 Mar 2014 #19

Their own businesses, legal and illegal 2banon Mar 2014 #30

That is the story that's emerged from the media over time. HereSince1628 Mar 2014 #34

On that point.. 2banon Mar 2014 #39

So let's see if the CIA can do with less tax payer support. idendoit Mar 2014 #44

Please remember KingBob Mar 2014 #7

The Chairman and Vice Chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee Aerows Mar 2014 #41

God forbid the repukes win the Senate in November LiberalEsto Mar 2014 #47

Count on it. Scuba Mar 2014 #57

Terrorists Augiedog Mar 2014 #10

I hope DiFi and her post office buying husband retire. merrily Mar 2014 #12

Really. That's all you have to say about this? Maedhros Mar 2014 #36

Not just her, but 14 other Senators Aerows Mar 2014 #42

The CIA has obviously overstepped their mandate and must be reined in. Enthusiast Mar 2014 #13

Yep, every candidate for federal office needs to be put on the spot about this. Scuba Mar 2014 #16

I'm sure they won't approve of our sentiments and might consider some sort of punishment. Enthusiast Mar 2014 #22

Posting the op on Facebook. Will probably get unfriended. F them. L0oniX Mar 2014 #24

ANSWER (to all questions): Police State. DeSwiss Mar 2014 #14

Secret LSD concentration camps are waiting for you. L0oniX Mar 2014 #26

You didn't need to type out all those questions. randome Mar 2014 #15

What makes you so upset that someone Aerows Mar 2014 #43

I don't know about that Number23 Mar 2014 #50

Very good questions! Glad you took the time to make this OP! Rex Mar 2014 #17

Great post. There is also a disconnect in reporting about this being W era torture underpants Mar 2014 #18

Good questions. The ProSense Mar 2014 #20

After Cointelpro ...no one should have expected them to stop. L0oniX Mar 2014 #23

K&R G_j Mar 2014 #25

K&R Solly Mack Mar 2014 #27

K&R tea and oranges Mar 2014 #28

K&R'd 2banon Mar 2014 #31

Kicked and Recommended! (nt) fascisthunter Mar 2014 #32

Does anyone believe that the attempted censoring of the Internal Panetta Review Maedhros Mar 2014 #37

I might have believed that at one time, but not anymore 2banon Mar 2014 #40

Seems to me that Panetta should be hauled before the committee under oath nt LiberalEsto Mar 2014 #48

Agreed. But he's wired to cover this up in the name of National Security 2banon Mar 2014 #49

panetta just made a list describing which docs went out to the senate questionseverything Mar 2014 #51

that's very interesting.. 2banon Mar 2014 #52

at the end of the article in that link was a really good interview with marci wheeler questionseverything Mar 2014 #53

I saw you post that link earlier, I think.. thanks! n/t 2banon Mar 2014 #55

Brennan didn't take over the CIA until 2011. Maedhros Mar 2014 #56

i am not going to go out on a limb defending panetta questionseverything Mar 2014 #58

Oh - I agree completely. Brennan needs to be held accountable and either Maedhros Mar 2014 #59

needs to be a c. option..prosecuted questionseverything Mar 2014 #60

C: Indict and convict. [n/t] Maedhros Mar 2014 #62

Good Questions. n/t myrna minx Mar 2014 #45

K&R. pacalo Mar 2014 #54

I have not heard a single news outlet woo me with science Mar 2014 #61

Corporate media report unbiased on the CIA? Rex Mar 2014 #63

kick woo me with science Mar 2014 #64

kick woo me with science Mar 2014 #65

Kick woo me with science Mar 2014 #66