Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I just came from a thread in which a poster was discussing "returns" on the NYSE since 2008... Romulox Mar 2014 #1
I know I read that and thought, "LOL wut?" nt laundry_queen Mar 2014 #116
President Obama ProSense Mar 2014 #2
zoom. it's a bird, it's a plane, it's super Pro. cali Mar 2014 #6
"the ProDefender." What are you 5 years old? n/t ProSense Mar 2014 #9
lol. you're one to talk, Pro. cali Mar 2014 #10
Wall Street profits dropped 30 percent last year ProSense Mar 2014 #12
Interesting that bonuses are also rising. n/t cprise Mar 2014 #33
It requires some thinking. n/t ProSense Mar 2014 #39
Faster than a Speeding Bullet. bahrbearian Mar 2014 #23
What's funny is LordGlenconner Mar 2014 #25
Astounding, no? A MINIMUM of three anti-Obama posts per day and she ... 11 Bravo Mar 2014 #35
What's "astounding" is how many jump in to blame Obama for Wall Street bonuses. ProSense Mar 2014 #37
Exactly! And when it's pointed out to them that he had NOTHING to do ... 11 Bravo Mar 2014 #40
It's utterly absurd Cali_Democrat Mar 2014 #50
I'll take Ignorant for $500, Alex. n/t Whisp Mar 2014 #105
Hateful ignorance causes crap to flow out of slavering mouths...J.P. Riley lumpy Mar 2014 #111
my kitchen sink got blocked today. Thanks, Obama! Whisp Mar 2014 #104
You didn't just win this thread. You won the WHOLE DAMN web site Number23 Mar 2014 #110
... warrprayer Mar 2014 #129
Bush and Obama are to blame for a situation out of which Wall Street was given the message JDPriestly Mar 2014 #75
No, ProSense Mar 2014 #80
What does that have to do with the fact that the Wall Street labor/employment contract JDPriestly Mar 2014 #81
What? The OP has nothing to do with ProSense Mar 2014 #82
Should we start a poll to rename PowerToThePeople Mar 2014 #3
if that's what you want to do, my dear, go for it. cali Mar 2014 #4
I don't need a meta thread PowerToThePeople Mar 2014 #7
Well, because they've been working 10000% harder than you people jsr Mar 2014 #5
In delusional aternate historyland, President Obama has battled cali Mar 2014 #8
The game is actually played in a multidimensional universe jsr Mar 2014 #11
... Fumesucker Mar 2014 #13
Now Obama controls private sector bonuses? Sheesh. JaneyVee Mar 2014 #14
No, I wanted DoJ prosecutins and I don't like the number of cali Mar 2014 #15
So now you're denying that the OP blames Obama for Wall Street bonuses? n/t ProSense Mar 2014 #16
I'm saying that the administration bears some of the responsibility cali Mar 2014 #17
Nonsense. You don't want him credited for the drop in profits, only the bonuses. n/t ProSense Mar 2014 #19
"Drop in profits" means outsiders get shafted. cprise Mar 2014 #36
So now Wall Street profits are good? ProSense Mar 2014 #38
Are you some kind of 'newspeak' enforcer? I won't play your game of dualism. cprise Mar 2014 #47
Don't try to deflect from the fact that you claimed Wall Street profits are good. ProSense Mar 2014 #52
And you're here to correct the errors of most DUers, no doubt cprise Mar 2014 #58
Yes, you stated that lower profits were a negative. n/t ProSense Mar 2014 #65
Most investors are not Wall St. bankers. But you want to frame it as black/white cprise Mar 2014 #68
Astroturfing weasel is not mud-slinging in your nearsighted world? lumpy Mar 2014 #114
"astroturfing Orwellian weasel" bvar22 Mar 2014 #124
Gaaakkkk..Now that's one spin too much, I'm dizzy lumpy Mar 2014 #112
Also passed some Wall Street reforms. Btw, who signed TARP anyway? JaneyVee Mar 2014 #20
BTW: Who voted FOR Tarp and lobbyied other Democratic Senators to vote FOR TARP... bvar22 Mar 2014 #125
Oh, I thought it was all Obama's fault. Sorry, I guess I misread your statement; so it is STILL lumpy Mar 2014 #109
You're the one who seems obsessed with him. JaneyVee Mar 2014 #18
No, I'm obsessed with policy and how it relates to creeping corporate power and cali Mar 2014 #21
What the hell does that have to do with blaming Obama for Wall Street bonuses? n/t ProSense Mar 2014 #22
Correct me if I'm wrong here, Pro, bvar22 Mar 2014 #126
How does one prosecute people for acts that were sleazy, but were still within written laws. nt bluestate10 Mar 2014 #98
that's about it, change the laws that were slithered in over the last 30 years. Whisp Mar 2014 #106
Not really. They want a D and don't give a crap what he does once elected. lark Mar 2014 #34
Actually the only people who think he's "Super Obama" Cali_Democrat Mar 2014 #41
Yep. NYC Liberal Mar 2014 #63
Yeah, agree about the bonus thing. lark Mar 2014 #67
The whole OP is about bonuses. Cali_Democrat Mar 2014 #69
Obama hate causes some people to show their ignorance. Just think of the ridiculous rhetoric lumpy Mar 2014 #108
Your complete ignoring of this thread ... 1StrongBlackMan Mar 2014 #24
didn't even see it, dear. oh and big fucking deal. cali Mar 2014 #44
You "see" and post every article (figuratively, of course) ... 1StrongBlackMan Mar 2014 #53
Some only see what they want to see, 1SBM. sheshe2 Mar 2014 #97
I guess ... 1StrongBlackMan Mar 2014 #103
Yes it is... sheshe2 Mar 2014 #107
"it is so, so transparent" and boring as all hell as well Number23 Mar 2014 #113
Obama gave those bonuses to Wall Street executives? Cali_Democrat Mar 2014 #26
So why have ALL the Banksters And Wall Streetians Blue_Tires Mar 2014 #27
They are furious: jsr Mar 2014 #30
because they're greedy, duplicitous fucks. and btw, President Obama cali Mar 2014 #43
Again ProSense Mar 2014 #45
One more time: cali Mar 2014 #51
Again, what the hell does that have to do with you blaming Obama for Wall Street bonuses? n/t ProSense Mar 2014 #55
If the WSJ, Fortune and other business publications are any sign Blue_Tires Mar 2014 #70
and today he is going to be 'very very good' to millions of workers who have been denied VanillaRhapsody Mar 2014 #28
a sop. cali Mar 2014 #42
A CRUMB? Are you serious? Obviously you are NOT someone this effects.. VanillaRhapsody Mar 2014 #57
Yes. a crumb. read the fucking details. cali Mar 2014 #59
Photo of Obama handing out Wall Street bonuses ProSense Mar 2014 #61
I have LIVED it! VanillaRhapsody Mar 2014 #77
The OP doesn't care about benefits that you gained from President Obama's efforts. bluestate10 Mar 2014 #100
Agreed....they cannot believe Obama didn't give them their ponies, unicorns and flying cars! VanillaRhapsody Mar 2014 #115
Wall Street is about as "well regulated" as the "well regulated militias" we hear about. Tierra_y_Libertad Mar 2014 #29
^^^this^^^ L0oniX Mar 2014 #31
They are financial terrorists I tells ya ...terrorists. L0oniX Mar 2014 #32
"We can't begrudge them their wealth" bvar22 Mar 2014 #46
Obama caps contractor pay ProSense Mar 2014 #48
YES!!! And he got a DOG too!!!! bvar22 Mar 2014 #64
Well, ProSense Mar 2014 #72
Full of NonSense.... as usual. bvar22 Mar 2014 #92
+1 a whole bunch! Enthusiast Mar 2014 #119
Actually, ProSense Mar 2014 #128
Well, the market was about HALF what it is now when he took office. JoePhilly Mar 2014 #49
where have the vast majority of those profits gone, dear? cali Mar 2014 #54
Is Obama to blame for the 30 percent drop in Wall Street profits? ProSense Mar 2014 #56
Post removed Post removed Mar 2014 #60
LOL. Five-year-old. n/t ProSense Mar 2014 #62
You defense a counterpoint with name calling. That is elementary schoolyard behavior. nt bluestate10 Mar 2014 #99
How exactly would a POTUS ... 1StrongBlackMan Mar 2014 #73
He gave those crooks billions through TARP highmindedhavi Mar 2014 #66
TARP was passed prior to Obama becoming President Cali_Democrat Mar 2014 #71
Right, but the majority of it was distributed in 2009. nt Romulox Mar 2014 #78
Yes...according to the TARP law that was passed in 2008, before Obama became President Cali_Democrat Mar 2014 #84
The Obama admin formally requested the funds. Romulox Mar 2014 #85
He had to by LAW. Cali_Democrat Mar 2014 #86
That's just false. Read the link. nt Romulox Mar 2014 #89
You're right then Cali_Democrat Mar 2014 #91
"I swear, some people here really do want a dictator. " Can you spell PROJECTION? nm rhett o rick Mar 2014 #96
Quantitative Easing BodieTown Mar 2014 #74
*EVERY* administration is good to Banksies and Wall Thieves. Kablooie Mar 2014 #76
Very good assessment. truedelphi Mar 2014 #95
Please forgive me for being a bit off-topic, but bonuses are something we should talk about. JDPriestly Mar 2014 #79
Thank you for that. Cali_Democrat Mar 2014 #90
Of course they have! Just look at his cabniet appointments! Rex Mar 2014 #83
AND to the uninsured Glitterati Mar 2014 #87
"nu-uh! so why are they complaining about him all the time? MisterP Mar 2014 #88
sheds light on another phenomenon we see at DU WhaTHellsgoingonhere Mar 2014 #93
And best news of all is if we get Hillary Clinton in the Oval Office, or truedelphi Mar 2014 #94
And so has Eric Holder, they are like the dynamic duo, dressed in green spandex... pragmatic_dem Mar 2014 #101
Only 30% of Americans have stock worth $5000 or more.... pragmatic_dem Mar 2014 #102
BUT, BUT, BUT ninth dimension chess!! DiverDave Mar 2014 #117
Meh Bobbie Jo Mar 2014 #121
TY for your well reasoned and thoughtful post DiverDave Mar 2014 #123
K&R! Way to go, cali! I'm inspired! Enthusiast Mar 2014 #118
Let me see if I get the logic here. NCTraveler Mar 2014 #120
K&R woo me with science Mar 2014 #122
I don't blame Obama the President but Obama the Senator should get some blame along with every..... yourout Mar 2014 #127
kick woo me with science Mar 2014 #130
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The Obama Administration ...»Reply #20