Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

KoKo

(84,711 posts)
Thu Mar 13, 2014, 01:22 PM Mar 2014

DiFi Okayed Staffers to SPIRIT AWAY & SECURE the "Panetta Review"...DEFYING the CIA's Own Counsel! [View all]

Last edited Thu Mar 13, 2014, 03:27 PM - Edit history (1)

(I've never had a nice word to say about Diane Feinstein but this report by Robert Sheer about what went on is a real ZINGER. Reveals the reason the CIA spied on staffers computers. It was SPITE to get back at DiFi for securing the Panetta Report because she thought they'd destroy it or hide it away from the Senate Investigation. Who Could Have Known she actually has some fight in her for Once!)

--------------------

Feinstein v. the CIA: A Moment of Truth
by Robert Scheer

As Feinstein pointed out, “the CIA hired a team of outside contractors—who otherwise would not have had access to these sensitive documents—to read, multiple times, each of the 6.2 million pages of documents produced, before providing them to fully-cleared committee staff conducting the committee’s oversight work. This proved to be a slow and very expensive process.”

It was so slow that the committee’s investigation has only now been completed. Along the way, documents that Senate staffers found interesting would then mysteriously disappear from the system. One such set of disappeared documents, referred to as the “Internal Panetta Review,” is now at the center of the CIA hacking scandal.

The Panetta Review became relevant in June, when the CIA offered its critique of the Senate study. But as Feinstein points out, “Some of those important parts that the CIA now disputes in our committee study are clearly acknowledged in the CIA’s own Internal Panetta Review. To say the least, this is puzzling. How can the CIA’s official response to our study stand factually in conflict with its own Internal Review?”

Relations between the Senate committee responsible for oversight of the CIA and the agency were so poor that, as Feinstein states, “after noting the disparity between the official CIA response to the committee study and the Internal Panetta Review, the committee staff securely transported a printed portion of the draft Internal Panetta Review from the committee’s secure room at the CIA-leased facility to the secure committee spaces in the Hart Senate Office Building.

Feinstein defended the committee staff’s spiriting information away from the CIA:”

“As I have detailed, the CIA has previously withheld and destroyed information about its Detention and Interrogation Program. ... There was a need to preserve and protect the Internal Panetta Review in the committee’s own secure spaces.”

The response of the CIA was to hack the computers that Senate staffers had been using at the CIA off-site location, and the agency’s acting general counsel filed a crimes report with the Department of Justice against the Senate committee’s staff.

That was too much for Feinstein, who outed the CIA’s counsel:

-----------

A MUST READ...Robert Sheer makes SENSE OUT OF this Very Complicated Event:

http://www.commondreams.org/view/2014/03/13-4

53 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
HUGE K & R !!! - THANK YOU !!! WillyT Mar 2014 #1
From DiFi's statement one can conclude that the Senate Intel Committee has not control over the CIA. Scuba Mar 2014 #2
Yes..I saw that but, couldn't make sense of it because I don't KoKo Mar 2014 #3
She is out of her depth Kelvin Mace Mar 2014 #4
you have foreseen the unthinkable grasswire Mar 2014 #5
Problem is, Kelvin Mace Mar 2014 #6
she's not the only one who could read the report. grasswire Mar 2014 #7
correcteamundo, and the plot thickens ... MindMover Mar 2014 #10
Yes, but I wonder if Kelvin Mace Mar 2014 #16
Ha. grasswire Mar 2014 #20
Once upon a time Kelvin Mace Mar 2014 #22
the best protection for Feinstein... grasswire Mar 2014 #33
Totally agree ... they should have started lining up last week ... MindMover Mar 2014 #37
The President cannot back out now. fleabiscuit Mar 2014 #12
Which gives him all the more reason to Kelvin Mace Mar 2014 #15
oh gee grasswire Mar 2014 #18
I wouldn’t try to take credit for what others point out. fleabiscuit Mar 2014 #28
this: "and then they decide who is going to be killed today" bobduca Mar 2014 #51
"just when I thought I was out, they pull me back in..." tularetom Mar 2014 #34
welcome back, good to have your opinion ... MindMover Mar 2014 #40
Well, it's actually Michael Corleone's opinion tularetom Mar 2014 #44
holder has hinted that he would consider going after the lawyers that told the agents questionseverything Mar 2014 #48
Yeah, he "hints" Kelvin Mace Mar 2014 #49
Unfortunately ...this is not the only time the CIA has its fingers in the ringer ... MindMover Mar 2014 #11
It kind of amazes me Aerows Mar 2014 #25
Who said, that I said, politicians lie ... they don't lie ... making up stories MindMover Mar 2014 #27
It wasn't directed at you Aerows Mar 2014 #29
It just seems very strange that an intelligence committee is so blind sided by ... MindMover Mar 2014 #31
It just tells me that some really ugly Aerows Mar 2014 #32
Yes, umm, lets say 6-8 maybe more, years past ugly and many thousands of peoples lives MindMover Mar 2014 #35
Some bad knowledge is on the horizon, MM Aerows Mar 2014 #38
In other words, there better be some meat on the bones and some heads should fall ... MindMover Mar 2014 #42
Your guess is as good as mine! Aerows Mar 2014 #43
She's lying Aerows Mar 2014 #24
Excuse me? Dems2002 Mar 2014 #46
She is out of her depth Kelvin Mace Mar 2014 #47
We'll see Dems2002 Mar 2014 #52
K & R Berlum Mar 2014 #8
K & R tea and oranges Mar 2014 #9
The totally sad thing is watching apologist carry water for the CIA. Rex Mar 2014 #13
I am often amazed at people's ability Kelvin Mace Mar 2014 #17
Me too. I expect it from Conservatives. They've lived in LALA land for decades. Rex Mar 2014 #19
When an absolute bombshell like this gets dropped my first thought is.. Fumesucker Mar 2014 #14
this is an amazing story G_j Mar 2014 #21
I remember when she was yuiyoshida Mar 2014 #23
Perhaps she was captured by the Borg. zeemike Mar 2014 #30
Isn't it ironic it's DiFi? DearAbby Mar 2014 #26
She knows the Constitution malaise Mar 2014 #36
"It's something that George W. Bush would have said" 2banon Mar 2014 #39
Quick question for the board Aerows Mar 2014 #41
Who runs the Government? Octafish Mar 2014 #45
Good for her. She did the right thing. nt msanthrope Mar 2014 #50
K&R. Thanks Koko! n/t Catherina Mar 2014 #53
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»DiFi Okayed Staffers to S...