Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: The Obama Administration Has Been Very, Very Good To Banksters And Wall Streetians [View all]ProSense
(116,464 posts)48. Obama caps contractor pay
He has control over that.
Executive order on federal contracting means real action on economic mobility
By Heather C. McGhee and Amy Traub
When it comes to boosting economic opportunity, President Obama isnt going to wait for Congress anymore...the President made a powerful statement about employers obligation to reward work -- starting with his own obligation as the executive in charge of millions of federal contracts.
In a study we released last May, Demos found that nearly two million private sector employees paid with federal tax dollars through contracts, loans, grants, leases and health spending, earn wages too low to support a family. These are people working on behalf of America, doing jobs that we have decided are worthy of public fundsyet theyre being treated in a very un-American way. Thats why federal workers have been walking off the job for the last year...Now the President has taken a major step to lift up hundreds of thousands of those workers. In the process, the president will help families work their way up out of poverty and give new momentum to efforts to raise the minimum wage for everyone laboring too hard for too little in todays low-pay economy.
The truth is that preferring contractors who pay workers at least $10.10 an hour will have benefits far beyond the workers themselves and their families. When our tax dollars subsidize and promote the creation of low-wage jobs rather than positions that enable workers to afford the necessities of life, there is a ripple effect throughout the economy: poorly-paid workers have less to spend in their communities, and businesses facing less consumer demand in turn hire fewer workers, stunting economic recovery. Low-paid workers also contribute less in taxes and more often need public benefits to provide for their families....From the 1931 Davis-Bacon Act onward, the idea that the federal government should be a model employer and that employees working on behalf of the public should have strong workplace protections has an extensive history in our country. The use of executive orders to improve the employment practices of companies granted federal contracts also has a long precedent. Beginning in 1941, successive presidents from both parties signed executive orders aimed at preventing employment discrimination by federal contractors. President Obamas order raising wages for companies that do business with the federal government follows this successful precedent.
If the cost of federal contracts is a concern, the spotlight should be not on the employees who will finally see a raise to $10.10 an hour, but rather on the over $21 billion a year the government spends on the pay of their bosses, the top executives at contracting firms. After Demos put a number on this subsidy of executive excess in a September report, Congress included a lower maximum pay reimbursement for contractors in its December budget deal. But even the lower cap still provides executives a roughly $234.00 an hour subsidy. When you consider that our current contracting system fuels inequality through both lavish compensation for CEOs and poverty wages for front-line workers, it becomes clear where cost-cutting efforts should be focused.
- more -
http://thehill.com/blogs/congress-blog/economy-budget/196837-executive-order-on-federal-contracting-means-real-action
By Heather C. McGhee and Amy Traub
When it comes to boosting economic opportunity, President Obama isnt going to wait for Congress anymore...the President made a powerful statement about employers obligation to reward work -- starting with his own obligation as the executive in charge of millions of federal contracts.
In a study we released last May, Demos found that nearly two million private sector employees paid with federal tax dollars through contracts, loans, grants, leases and health spending, earn wages too low to support a family. These are people working on behalf of America, doing jobs that we have decided are worthy of public fundsyet theyre being treated in a very un-American way. Thats why federal workers have been walking off the job for the last year...Now the President has taken a major step to lift up hundreds of thousands of those workers. In the process, the president will help families work their way up out of poverty and give new momentum to efforts to raise the minimum wage for everyone laboring too hard for too little in todays low-pay economy.
The truth is that preferring contractors who pay workers at least $10.10 an hour will have benefits far beyond the workers themselves and their families. When our tax dollars subsidize and promote the creation of low-wage jobs rather than positions that enable workers to afford the necessities of life, there is a ripple effect throughout the economy: poorly-paid workers have less to spend in their communities, and businesses facing less consumer demand in turn hire fewer workers, stunting economic recovery. Low-paid workers also contribute less in taxes and more often need public benefits to provide for their families....From the 1931 Davis-Bacon Act onward, the idea that the federal government should be a model employer and that employees working on behalf of the public should have strong workplace protections has an extensive history in our country. The use of executive orders to improve the employment practices of companies granted federal contracts also has a long precedent. Beginning in 1941, successive presidents from both parties signed executive orders aimed at preventing employment discrimination by federal contractors. President Obamas order raising wages for companies that do business with the federal government follows this successful precedent.
If the cost of federal contracts is a concern, the spotlight should be not on the employees who will finally see a raise to $10.10 an hour, but rather on the over $21 billion a year the government spends on the pay of their bosses, the top executives at contracting firms. After Demos put a number on this subsidy of executive excess in a September report, Congress included a lower maximum pay reimbursement for contractors in its December budget deal. But even the lower cap still provides executives a roughly $234.00 an hour subsidy. When you consider that our current contracting system fuels inequality through both lavish compensation for CEOs and poverty wages for front-line workers, it becomes clear where cost-cutting efforts should be focused.
- more -
http://thehill.com/blogs/congress-blog/economy-budget/196837-executive-order-on-federal-contracting-means-real-action
On the lower cap for maximum pay...
Varied views on new contractor-pay cap
By Josh Hicks
Federal worker unions have applauded a new limit on pay for government contractors, but one industry group has warned that the arbitrary cap will cause problems for those who do business with federal agencies.
The restriction, which came as part of the new budget deal Congress and President Obama approved last month, reduced the highest level of contractor compensation from its previous annual limit of $952,000 per individual to $487,000 per individual, a drop of nearly 49 percent.
The Professional Services Council, a group that represents the professional- and technical-services industries, said in a statement on Friday that the rule will inhibit the ability of companies to attract top talent.
<...>
The American Federation of Government Employees has argued since at least last year for lowering the limit to $230,700, which would match Vice President Bidens salary in 2013. The organization included that proposal in its list of 2014 legislative priorities.
- more -
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/federal-eye/wp/2014/01/03/varied-views-on-new-contractor-pay-cap/
By Josh Hicks
Federal worker unions have applauded a new limit on pay for government contractors, but one industry group has warned that the arbitrary cap will cause problems for those who do business with federal agencies.
The restriction, which came as part of the new budget deal Congress and President Obama approved last month, reduced the highest level of contractor compensation from its previous annual limit of $952,000 per individual to $487,000 per individual, a drop of nearly 49 percent.
The Professional Services Council, a group that represents the professional- and technical-services industries, said in a statement on Friday that the rule will inhibit the ability of companies to attract top talent.
<...>
The American Federation of Government Employees has argued since at least last year for lowering the limit to $230,700, which would match Vice President Bidens salary in 2013. The organization included that proposal in its list of 2014 legislative priorities.
- more -
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/federal-eye/wp/2014/01/03/varied-views-on-new-contractor-pay-cap/
Obama pushes to limit federal spending on corporate executive pay
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022927167
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
130 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
The Obama Administration Has Been Very, Very Good To Banksters And Wall Streetians [View all]
cali
Mar 2014
OP
I just came from a thread in which a poster was discussing "returns" on the NYSE since 2008...
Romulox
Mar 2014
#1
What's "astounding" is how many jump in to blame Obama for Wall Street bonuses.
ProSense
Mar 2014
#37
Bush and Obama are to blame for a situation out of which Wall Street was given the message
JDPriestly
Mar 2014
#75
What does that have to do with the fact that the Wall Street labor/employment contract
JDPriestly
Mar 2014
#81
Nonsense. You don't want him credited for the drop in profits, only the bonuses. n/t
ProSense
Mar 2014
#19
Don't try to deflect from the fact that you claimed Wall Street profits are good.
ProSense
Mar 2014
#52
Most investors are not Wall St. bankers. But you want to frame it as black/white
cprise
Mar 2014
#68
BTW: Who voted FOR Tarp and lobbyied other Democratic Senators to vote FOR TARP...
bvar22
Mar 2014
#125
Oh, I thought it was all Obama's fault. Sorry, I guess I misread your statement; so it is STILL
lumpy
Mar 2014
#109
What the hell does that have to do with blaming Obama for Wall Street bonuses? n/t
ProSense
Mar 2014
#22
How does one prosecute people for acts that were sleazy, but were still within written laws. nt
bluestate10
Mar 2014
#98
Obama hate causes some people to show their ignorance. Just think of the ridiculous rhetoric
lumpy
Mar 2014
#108
Again, what the hell does that have to do with you blaming Obama for Wall Street bonuses? n/t
ProSense
Mar 2014
#55
and today he is going to be 'very very good' to millions of workers who have been denied
VanillaRhapsody
Mar 2014
#28
The OP doesn't care about benefits that you gained from President Obama's efforts.
bluestate10
Mar 2014
#100
Agreed....they cannot believe Obama didn't give them their ponies, unicorns and flying cars!
VanillaRhapsody
Mar 2014
#115
Wall Street is about as "well regulated" as the "well regulated militias" we hear about.
Tierra_y_Libertad
Mar 2014
#29
You defense a counterpoint with name calling. That is elementary schoolyard behavior. nt
bluestate10
Mar 2014
#99
Yes...according to the TARP law that was passed in 2008, before Obama became President
Cali_Democrat
Mar 2014
#84
"I swear, some people here really do want a dictator. " Can you spell PROJECTION? nm
rhett o rick
Mar 2014
#96
Please forgive me for being a bit off-topic, but bonuses are something we should talk about.
JDPriestly
Mar 2014
#79
And so has Eric Holder, they are like the dynamic duo, dressed in green spandex...
pragmatic_dem
Mar 2014
#101