Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
48. Obama caps contractor pay
Thu Mar 13, 2014, 01:52 PM
Mar 2014

He has control over that.

Executive order on federal contracting means real action on economic mobility

By Heather C. McGhee and Amy Traub

When it comes to boosting economic opportunity, President Obama isn’t going to wait for Congress anymore...the President made a powerful statement about employers’ obligation to reward work -- starting with his own obligation as the executive in charge of millions of federal contracts.

In a study we released last May, Demos found that nearly two million private sector employees paid with federal tax dollars through contracts, loans, grants, leases and health spending, earn wages too low to support a family. These are people working on behalf of America, doing jobs that we have decided are worthy of public funds—yet they’re being treated in a very un-American way. That’s why federal workers have been walking off the job for the last year...Now the President has taken a major step to lift up hundreds of thousands of those workers. In the process, the president will help families work their way up out of poverty and give new momentum to efforts to raise the minimum wage for everyone laboring too hard for too little in today’s low-pay economy.

The truth is that preferring contractors who pay workers at least $10.10 an hour will have benefits far beyond the workers themselves and their families. When our tax dollars subsidize and promote the creation of low-wage jobs rather than positions that enable workers to afford the necessities of life, there is a ripple effect throughout the economy: poorly-paid workers have less to spend in their communities, and businesses facing less consumer demand in turn hire fewer workers, stunting economic recovery. Low-paid workers also contribute less in taxes and more often need public benefits to provide for their families....From the 1931 Davis-Bacon Act onward, the idea that the federal government should be a model employer – and that employees working on behalf of the public should have strong workplace protections – has an extensive history in our country. The use of executive orders to improve the employment practices of companies granted federal contracts also has a long precedent. Beginning in 1941, successive presidents from both parties signed executive orders aimed at preventing employment discrimination by federal contractors. President Obama’s order raising wages for companies that do business with the federal government follows this successful precedent.

If the cost of federal contracts is a concern, the spotlight should be not on the employees who will finally see a raise to $10.10 an hour, but rather on the over $21 billion a year the government spends on the pay of their bosses, the top executives at contracting firms. After Demos put a number on this subsidy of executive excess in a September report, Congress included a lower maximum pay reimbursement for contractors in its December budget deal. But even the lower cap still provides executives a roughly $234.00 an hour subsidy. When you consider that our current contracting system fuels inequality through both lavish compensation for CEOs and poverty wages for front-line workers, it becomes clear where cost-cutting efforts should be focused.

- more -

http://thehill.com/blogs/congress-blog/economy-budget/196837-executive-order-on-federal-contracting-means-real-action

On the lower cap for maximum pay...

Varied views on new contractor-pay cap

By Josh Hicks

Federal worker unions have applauded a new limit on pay for government contractors, but one industry group has warned that the “arbitrary” cap will cause problems for those who do business with federal agencies.

The restriction, which came as part of the new budget deal Congress and President Obama approved last month, reduced the highest level of contractor compensation from its previous annual limit of $952,000 per individual to $487,000 per individual, a drop of nearly 49 percent.

The Professional Services Council, a group that represents the professional- and technical-services industries, said in a statement on Friday that the rule will “inhibit the ability of companies to attract top talent.”

<...>

The American Federation of Government Employees has argued since at least last year for lowering the limit to $230,700, which would match Vice President Biden’s salary in 2013. The organization included that proposal in its list of 2014 legislative priorities.

- more -

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/federal-eye/wp/2014/01/03/varied-views-on-new-contractor-pay-cap/

Obama pushes to limit federal spending on corporate executive pay
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022927167

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I just came from a thread in which a poster was discussing "returns" on the NYSE since 2008... Romulox Mar 2014 #1
I know I read that and thought, "LOL wut?" nt laundry_queen Mar 2014 #116
President Obama ProSense Mar 2014 #2
zoom. it's a bird, it's a plane, it's super Pro. cali Mar 2014 #6
"the ProDefender." What are you 5 years old? n/t ProSense Mar 2014 #9
lol. you're one to talk, Pro. cali Mar 2014 #10
Wall Street profits dropped 30 percent last year ProSense Mar 2014 #12
Interesting that bonuses are also rising. n/t cprise Mar 2014 #33
It requires some thinking. n/t ProSense Mar 2014 #39
Faster than a Speeding Bullet. bahrbearian Mar 2014 #23
What's funny is LordGlenconner Mar 2014 #25
Astounding, no? A MINIMUM of three anti-Obama posts per day and she ... 11 Bravo Mar 2014 #35
What's "astounding" is how many jump in to blame Obama for Wall Street bonuses. ProSense Mar 2014 #37
Exactly! And when it's pointed out to them that he had NOTHING to do ... 11 Bravo Mar 2014 #40
It's utterly absurd Cali_Democrat Mar 2014 #50
I'll take Ignorant for $500, Alex. n/t Whisp Mar 2014 #105
Hateful ignorance causes crap to flow out of slavering mouths...J.P. Riley lumpy Mar 2014 #111
my kitchen sink got blocked today. Thanks, Obama! Whisp Mar 2014 #104
You didn't just win this thread. You won the WHOLE DAMN web site Number23 Mar 2014 #110
... warrprayer Mar 2014 #129
Bush and Obama are to blame for a situation out of which Wall Street was given the message JDPriestly Mar 2014 #75
No, ProSense Mar 2014 #80
What does that have to do with the fact that the Wall Street labor/employment contract JDPriestly Mar 2014 #81
What? The OP has nothing to do with ProSense Mar 2014 #82
Should we start a poll to rename PowerToThePeople Mar 2014 #3
if that's what you want to do, my dear, go for it. cali Mar 2014 #4
I don't need a meta thread PowerToThePeople Mar 2014 #7
Well, because they've been working 10000% harder than you people jsr Mar 2014 #5
In delusional aternate historyland, President Obama has battled cali Mar 2014 #8
The game is actually played in a multidimensional universe jsr Mar 2014 #11
... Fumesucker Mar 2014 #13
Now Obama controls private sector bonuses? Sheesh. JaneyVee Mar 2014 #14
No, I wanted DoJ prosecutins and I don't like the number of cali Mar 2014 #15
So now you're denying that the OP blames Obama for Wall Street bonuses? n/t ProSense Mar 2014 #16
I'm saying that the administration bears some of the responsibility cali Mar 2014 #17
Nonsense. You don't want him credited for the drop in profits, only the bonuses. n/t ProSense Mar 2014 #19
"Drop in profits" means outsiders get shafted. cprise Mar 2014 #36
So now Wall Street profits are good? ProSense Mar 2014 #38
Are you some kind of 'newspeak' enforcer? I won't play your game of dualism. cprise Mar 2014 #47
Don't try to deflect from the fact that you claimed Wall Street profits are good. ProSense Mar 2014 #52
And you're here to correct the errors of most DUers, no doubt cprise Mar 2014 #58
Yes, you stated that lower profits were a negative. n/t ProSense Mar 2014 #65
Most investors are not Wall St. bankers. But you want to frame it as black/white cprise Mar 2014 #68
Astroturfing weasel is not mud-slinging in your nearsighted world? lumpy Mar 2014 #114
"astroturfing Orwellian weasel" bvar22 Mar 2014 #124
Gaaakkkk..Now that's one spin too much, I'm dizzy lumpy Mar 2014 #112
Also passed some Wall Street reforms. Btw, who signed TARP anyway? JaneyVee Mar 2014 #20
BTW: Who voted FOR Tarp and lobbyied other Democratic Senators to vote FOR TARP... bvar22 Mar 2014 #125
Oh, I thought it was all Obama's fault. Sorry, I guess I misread your statement; so it is STILL lumpy Mar 2014 #109
You're the one who seems obsessed with him. JaneyVee Mar 2014 #18
No, I'm obsessed with policy and how it relates to creeping corporate power and cali Mar 2014 #21
What the hell does that have to do with blaming Obama for Wall Street bonuses? n/t ProSense Mar 2014 #22
Correct me if I'm wrong here, Pro, bvar22 Mar 2014 #126
How does one prosecute people for acts that were sleazy, but were still within written laws. nt bluestate10 Mar 2014 #98
that's about it, change the laws that were slithered in over the last 30 years. Whisp Mar 2014 #106
Not really. They want a D and don't give a crap what he does once elected. lark Mar 2014 #34
Actually the only people who think he's "Super Obama" Cali_Democrat Mar 2014 #41
Yep. NYC Liberal Mar 2014 #63
Yeah, agree about the bonus thing. lark Mar 2014 #67
The whole OP is about bonuses. Cali_Democrat Mar 2014 #69
Obama hate causes some people to show their ignorance. Just think of the ridiculous rhetoric lumpy Mar 2014 #108
Your complete ignoring of this thread ... 1StrongBlackMan Mar 2014 #24
didn't even see it, dear. oh and big fucking deal. cali Mar 2014 #44
You "see" and post every article (figuratively, of course) ... 1StrongBlackMan Mar 2014 #53
Some only see what they want to see, 1SBM. sheshe2 Mar 2014 #97
I guess ... 1StrongBlackMan Mar 2014 #103
Yes it is... sheshe2 Mar 2014 #107
"it is so, so transparent" and boring as all hell as well Number23 Mar 2014 #113
Obama gave those bonuses to Wall Street executives? Cali_Democrat Mar 2014 #26
So why have ALL the Banksters And Wall Streetians Blue_Tires Mar 2014 #27
They are furious: jsr Mar 2014 #30
because they're greedy, duplicitous fucks. and btw, President Obama cali Mar 2014 #43
Again ProSense Mar 2014 #45
One more time: cali Mar 2014 #51
Again, what the hell does that have to do with you blaming Obama for Wall Street bonuses? n/t ProSense Mar 2014 #55
If the WSJ, Fortune and other business publications are any sign Blue_Tires Mar 2014 #70
and today he is going to be 'very very good' to millions of workers who have been denied VanillaRhapsody Mar 2014 #28
a sop. cali Mar 2014 #42
A CRUMB? Are you serious? Obviously you are NOT someone this effects.. VanillaRhapsody Mar 2014 #57
Yes. a crumb. read the fucking details. cali Mar 2014 #59
Photo of Obama handing out Wall Street bonuses ProSense Mar 2014 #61
I have LIVED it! VanillaRhapsody Mar 2014 #77
The OP doesn't care about benefits that you gained from President Obama's efforts. bluestate10 Mar 2014 #100
Agreed....they cannot believe Obama didn't give them their ponies, unicorns and flying cars! VanillaRhapsody Mar 2014 #115
Wall Street is about as "well regulated" as the "well regulated militias" we hear about. Tierra_y_Libertad Mar 2014 #29
^^^this^^^ L0oniX Mar 2014 #31
They are financial terrorists I tells ya ...terrorists. L0oniX Mar 2014 #32
"We can't begrudge them their wealth" bvar22 Mar 2014 #46
Obama caps contractor pay ProSense Mar 2014 #48
YES!!! And he got a DOG too!!!! bvar22 Mar 2014 #64
Well, ProSense Mar 2014 #72
Full of NonSense.... as usual. bvar22 Mar 2014 #92
+1 a whole bunch! Enthusiast Mar 2014 #119
Actually, ProSense Mar 2014 #128
Well, the market was about HALF what it is now when he took office. JoePhilly Mar 2014 #49
where have the vast majority of those profits gone, dear? cali Mar 2014 #54
Is Obama to blame for the 30 percent drop in Wall Street profits? ProSense Mar 2014 #56
Post removed Post removed Mar 2014 #60
LOL. Five-year-old. n/t ProSense Mar 2014 #62
You defense a counterpoint with name calling. That is elementary schoolyard behavior. nt bluestate10 Mar 2014 #99
How exactly would a POTUS ... 1StrongBlackMan Mar 2014 #73
He gave those crooks billions through TARP highmindedhavi Mar 2014 #66
TARP was passed prior to Obama becoming President Cali_Democrat Mar 2014 #71
Right, but the majority of it was distributed in 2009. nt Romulox Mar 2014 #78
Yes...according to the TARP law that was passed in 2008, before Obama became President Cali_Democrat Mar 2014 #84
The Obama admin formally requested the funds. Romulox Mar 2014 #85
He had to by LAW. Cali_Democrat Mar 2014 #86
That's just false. Read the link. nt Romulox Mar 2014 #89
You're right then Cali_Democrat Mar 2014 #91
"I swear, some people here really do want a dictator. " Can you spell PROJECTION? nm rhett o rick Mar 2014 #96
Quantitative Easing BodieTown Mar 2014 #74
*EVERY* administration is good to Banksies and Wall Thieves. Kablooie Mar 2014 #76
Very good assessment. truedelphi Mar 2014 #95
Please forgive me for being a bit off-topic, but bonuses are something we should talk about. JDPriestly Mar 2014 #79
Thank you for that. Cali_Democrat Mar 2014 #90
Of course they have! Just look at his cabniet appointments! Rex Mar 2014 #83
AND to the uninsured Glitterati Mar 2014 #87
"nu-uh! so why are they complaining about him all the time? MisterP Mar 2014 #88
sheds light on another phenomenon we see at DU WhaTHellsgoingonhere Mar 2014 #93
And best news of all is if we get Hillary Clinton in the Oval Office, or truedelphi Mar 2014 #94
And so has Eric Holder, they are like the dynamic duo, dressed in green spandex... pragmatic_dem Mar 2014 #101
Only 30% of Americans have stock worth $5000 or more.... pragmatic_dem Mar 2014 #102
BUT, BUT, BUT ninth dimension chess!! DiverDave Mar 2014 #117
Meh Bobbie Jo Mar 2014 #121
TY for your well reasoned and thoughtful post DiverDave Mar 2014 #123
K&R! Way to go, cali! I'm inspired! Enthusiast Mar 2014 #118
Let me see if I get the logic here. NCTraveler Mar 2014 #120
K&R woo me with science Mar 2014 #122
I don't blame Obama the President but Obama the Senator should get some blame along with every..... yourout Mar 2014 #127
kick woo me with science Mar 2014 #130
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The Obama Administration ...»Reply #48