Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

riqster

(13,986 posts)
Fri Mar 14, 2014, 01:59 PM Mar 2014

The right to free speech is NOT the right to get your own, whiny-assed way. [View all]

http://bluntandcranky.wordpress.com/2014/03/14/the-right-to-free-speech-is-not-the-right-to-get-your-own-whiny-assed-way/

"No, it’s the right to speak freely. And regardless of Randall Scott’s idiotic claims to the contrary, he has freely expressed himself. Hoo boy, did he ever. And nobody cut off his Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, or email accounts. He spoke freely, no question about it. He trash-talked the Prexy in the finest Teabagger tradition, in person and across the Intertubez.

What this jackass little tin god teacher did not get was rewarded for his speech, which included little bon mots like :
Randall Scott @rscottmsg
WOTUS @ OBAMA IS A PUSSY
And
Randall Scott @rscottmsgt
A weed smoking Kenyan is your president. And he is in charge of your health care. Seems normal. If… http://instagram.com/p/k3HdO0E4R5/

Along with other stupid, racist, Teabagging, Birtherbot twaddle. Post after post of this crap, and once again, NOBODY SHUT HIM DOWN. Not ever. Not once.

So why does this Scott Ass Wipe say his rights to free speech have been violated? Because he wasn’t allowed to go and listen to Obama give a speech. Got that? Mr. Scott says that not being allowed to be in an auditorium is the same thing as not being allowed to speak.

Sorry, Randy old son, but you just flunked out of the school you teach in. You freely expressed your odious opinions, and that is what the First Amendment gives you. You didn’t get to go to a speech; you didn’t get a friggin’ pony, either. You got what the law gives us all: nothing more, nothing less.

So quitcherbitchin' boyo."


Source info at the link.
37 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Righteous rant! Feral Child Mar 2014 #1
Thanks. No pony for him! riqster Mar 2014 #16
They all live in Victimland. Sarah Palin is the Victim in Chief. Scuba Mar 2014 #2
+1000 Tom Ripley Mar 2014 #8
Poor widdle cweatures. riqster Mar 2014 #14
At least he still his job. Some teachers get fired for: okaawhatever Mar 2014 #3
Christ on a pogo stick. riqster Mar 2014 #13
K & R. n/t FSogol Mar 2014 #4
Very well said! K&R 11 Bravo Mar 2014 #5
TY riqster Mar 2014 #12
I think in that jerk's case, actions should have consequences. MADem Mar 2014 #6
He's been the subject of student complaints. riqster Mar 2014 #11
If I had a kid in his class, they'd never hear the end of it, until he was terminated. n/t freshwest Mar 2014 #18
That jerkwad seems woefully underqualified to be teaching social studies Tom Ripley Mar 2014 #7
Two students have asked to get a different teacher. riqster Mar 2014 #9
Good for them; I hope they succeed. Tom Ripley Mar 2014 #10
You know that a bunch of rwnj think you just said you hope the school leaves the union, right? nt okaawhatever Mar 2014 #15
LOL! Tom Ripley Mar 2014 #17
He teaches Anti-Social Studies. nt TeamPooka Mar 2014 #20
+1! FailureToCommunicate Mar 2014 #21
... riqster Mar 2014 #25
His claim is idiotic. . pipoman Mar 2014 #19
K&R thanks riqster! Cha Mar 2014 #22
Back atcha Cha! riqster Mar 2014 #28
.. Cha Mar 2014 #29
The meaning of the word "speech" agent46 Mar 2014 #23
Actually, his logic still sucks. riqster Mar 2014 #26
You're right agent46 Mar 2014 #30
This: riqster Mar 2014 #31
Randy Scott is such an idiotic asswipe..... AverageJoe90 Mar 2014 #24
He is, as one of my late great-uncles would have said, riqster Mar 2014 #27
I'm going to take a contrarian position to the OP onenote Mar 2014 #32
If he had complained about being excluded, that is one thing. riqster Mar 2014 #33
if he was singled out for his online anti-Obama crap, it absolutely implicates the first amendment onenote Mar 2014 #34
If you read the articles referenced in the link at the OP, riqster Mar 2014 #35
the school shot itself in the foot by giving a pre textual excuse for not allowing him in onenote Mar 2014 #36
Yep, that was a whole bucket of stupid there. Although it could be an HR restriction, I guess. riqster Mar 2014 #37
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The right to free speech ...