Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

mzteris

(16,232 posts)
4. not sure where the "violation" is
Sat Mar 24, 2012, 04:35 PM
Mar 2012

WE ARE COMMITTED TO:
* Seeking and reporting the truth in a truthful way
* Serving the public interest
* Exercising fair play
* Maintaining independence
* Acting with integrity

Seeking and reporting the truth in a truthful way

* We will dedicate ourselves to reporting the news accurately, thoroughly and in context.
* We will be honest in the way we gather, report and present news.
* We will be persistent in the pursuit of the whole story.
* We will keep our word.
* We will hold factual information in opinion columns and editorials to the same standards of accuracy as news stories.
* We will seek to gain sufficient understanding of the communities, individuals and stories we cover to provide an informed account of activities.

Serving the public interest

* We will uphold First Amendment principles to serve the democratic process.
* We will be vigilant watchdogs of government and institutions that affect the public.
* We will provide the news and information that people need to function as effective citizens.
* We will seek solutions as well as expose problems and wrongdoing.
* We will provide a public forum for diverse people and views.
* We will reflect and encourage understanding of the diverse segments of our community.
* We will provide editorial and community leadership.
* We will seek to promote understanding of complex issues.

Exercising fair play

* We will treat people with dignity, respect and compassion.
* We will correct errors promptly.
* We will strive to include all sides relevant to a story and not take sides in news coverage.
* We will explain to readers our journalistic processes.
* We will give particular attention to fairness in relations with people unaccustomed to dealing with the press.
* We will use unnamed sources as the sole basis for published information only as a last resort and under specific procedures that best serve the public's right to know.
* We will be accessible to readers.

Maintaining independence

* We will remain free of outside interests, investments or business relationships that may compromise the credibility of our news report.
* We will maintain an impartial, arm's length relationship with anyone seeking to influence the news.
* We will avoid potential conflicts of interest and eliminate inappropriate influence on content.
* We will be free of improper obligations to news sources, newsmakers and advertisers.
* We will differentiate advertising from news.

Acting with integrity

* We will act honorably and ethically in dealing with news sources, the public and our colleagues.
* We will obey the law.
* We will observe common standards of decency.
* We will take responsibility for our decisions and consider the possible consequences of our actions.
* We will be conscientious in observing these Principles.
* We will always try to do the right thing.

Note:
No statement of principles and procedures can envision every circumstance that may be faced in the course of covering the news. As in the United States Constitution, fundamental principles sometimes conflict. Careful judgment and common sense must be applied to make the decisions that best serve the public interest and result in the greatest good.

To help protect these Principles, practices have been drafted to address such subjects as unnamed sources, correcting errors and other issues. These guidelines have been distributed within the newsroom and are available upon request.

This newspaper and its news professionals are committed to observing the highest standards of journalism, as expressed by these Principles.

******

Except possibly these: We will maintain an impartial, arm's length relationship with anyone seeking to influence the news.
* We will avoid potential conflicts of interest and eliminate inappropriate influence on content.''

But I think this statement trumps: As in the United States Constitution, fundamental principles sometimes conflict.

They can't take away your right to participate as an individual in the political process!

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Gannett sucks ass. cyberswede Mar 2012 #1
Good. I applaud them for this cthulu2016 Mar 2012 #2
Yes, we can't have employees exercising their constitutional rights, now, can we? Scuba Mar 2012 #20
Nope, now if only their masters could keep them from voting. Incitatus Mar 2012 #25
I don't always agree with it, but Blue_Tires Mar 2012 #32
Problem is as a journalist you are not supposed to sign petitions nadinbrzezinski Mar 2012 #37
Perhaps, but since Gannet has not a single "journalist" on their staff it doesn't apply.... Scuba Mar 2012 #46
They don't nadinbrzezinski Mar 2012 #53
Yeah, those darn typesetters, always spinning the message.... Scuba Mar 2012 #54
Gannett's Principles of Ethical Conduct mzteris Mar 2012 #3
No, it doesn't nobodyspecial Mar 2012 #5
What's the difference between signing a petition and voting? Fawke Em Mar 2012 #6
Lots of reporters don't vote. nobodyspecial Mar 2012 #9
IIRC, Keith Olbermann doesn't vote, for reasons along those lines. n/t Ian David Mar 2012 #18
I find that hard to believe considering the big flap over his donating 1monster Mar 2012 #21
At least, that USED to be the case. Ian David Mar 2012 #33
The Vote Is Private...Petitions Are Not... KharmaTrain Mar 2012 #47
so they're not allowed to vote? n/t mzteris Mar 2012 #11
Some reporters do not vote nadinbrzezinski Mar 2012 #38
that's a bit ridiculous. mzteris Mar 2012 #50
No, it's nothing to do with employers nadinbrzezinski Mar 2012 #52
not sure where the "violation" is mzteris Mar 2012 #4
That is their statement as a newspaper, not the personnel policy nobodyspecial Mar 2012 #7
I'm sorry, but I think you're mistaken mzteris Mar 2012 #14
I never said you could nobodyspecial Mar 2012 #17
Signing A Petition Is Not Voting... KharmaTrain Mar 2012 #49
Not correct cthulu2016 Mar 2012 #10
Thank you for the good examples nobodyspecial Mar 2012 #12
And I bet they don't discourage investigation regarding their advertisers angstlessk Mar 2012 #8
The recall signatures never should have been made public. postulater Mar 2012 #13
There never was any assurance or promise of secrecy nobodyspecial Mar 2012 #16
I am disagreeing with the GAB policy of making the signatures public. postulater Mar 2012 #19
From the policy: nobodyspecial Mar 2012 #23
I disagree with both policies but agree that postulater Mar 2012 #41
That is not just GAB policy. former9thward Mar 2012 #34
If it is then I disagree with that. postulater Mar 2012 #35
From the NY Times nobodyspecial Mar 2012 #15
And we all know just how impartial the NYT is. hobbit709 Mar 2012 #22
Well, both the right and left are regularly and equally mad at their policies nobodyspecial Mar 2012 #24
"your side"???? Are calling the previous poster a right-winger? Careful, someone's about to alert. Scuba Mar 2012 #26
I wasn't calling anybody a right-winger nobodyspecial Mar 2012 #27
Anyone who's dealt with me more than five minutes would respond like this hobbit709 Mar 2012 #30
1st Amendment PSUDem Mar 2012 #31
So a journalist does not have the right to vote? jwirr Mar 2012 #28
Have you read the thread? nobodyspecial Mar 2012 #29
What publications are a part of Gannett? We need to enact some 'serious measures' Zalatix Mar 2012 #36
You might want to boycott every paper in the country nadinbrzezinski Mar 2012 #39
Yeah but you're on the DU, if you're a reporter, wouldn't they get you for that? Zalatix Mar 2012 #43
Reporters have a private life nadinbrzezinski Mar 2012 #44
Uh ya gots a copy of those Gannett's Principles of Ethical Conduct? benld74 Mar 2012 #40
I don't equal signing a petition with campaigning or proseletizing Poiuyt Mar 2012 #42
From the NY Times nobodyspecial Mar 2012 #45
If you were for ethical conduct Genia, you would have signed the petition also. mmonk Mar 2012 #48
Policies like this are wrong ibegurpard Mar 2012 #51
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Gannett vows 'serious mea...»Reply #4