Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

nobodyspecial

(2,286 posts)
15. From the NY Times
Sat Mar 24, 2012, 04:57 PM
Mar 2012
http://www.nytco.com/press/ethics.html#B

Voting, Campaigns and Public Issues

89. Journalists do not take part in politics. While staff members are entitled to vote and to register in party primaries, they must do nothing that might raise questions about their professional neutrality or that of our news operations. In particular, they may not campaign for, demonstrate for, or endorse candidates, ballot causes or efforts to enact legislation. They may not wear campaign buttons or themselves display any other insignia of partisan politics.

90. Staff members may not themselves give money to any political candidate or election cause or raise money for one. Given the ease of Internet access to public records of campaign contributions, any political giving by a staff member would risk feeding a false impression that we are taking sides.

91. No staff member may seek public office anywhere. Seeking or serving in public office violates the professional detachment expected of a journalist. Active participation by one of our staff can sow a suspicion of favoritism in political coverage.

92. Staff members may not march or rally in support of public causes or movements or sign advertisements or petitions taking a position on public issues. They may not lend their names to campaigns, benefit dinners or similar events if doing so might reasonably raise doubts about their ability or their newsroom's ability to remain neutral in covering the news. Neighbors and other outsiders commonly see us as representatives of our institution.

93. Staff members may appear from time to time on local or national radio and television programs devoted to public affairs, but they should avoid expressing views that go beyond the news and analysis that could properly appear under their regular bylines. Op-Ed columnists and editorial writers enjoy more leeway than others in speaking publicly, because their business is expressing opinions. They should nevertheless choose carefully the forums in which they appear and protect the impartiality of our journalism.

94. A staff member with doubts about a proposed political activity should consult a responsible manager. These guidelines protect the heart of our mission as journalists. Where the conflict with our impartiality seems minimal, top news executives may consider matters case by case, but they should be exceedingly cautious before permitting an exception.


Most newspapers have similar policies.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Gannett sucks ass. cyberswede Mar 2012 #1
Good. I applaud them for this cthulu2016 Mar 2012 #2
Yes, we can't have employees exercising their constitutional rights, now, can we? Scuba Mar 2012 #20
Nope, now if only their masters could keep them from voting. Incitatus Mar 2012 #25
I don't always agree with it, but Blue_Tires Mar 2012 #32
Problem is as a journalist you are not supposed to sign petitions nadinbrzezinski Mar 2012 #37
Perhaps, but since Gannet has not a single "journalist" on their staff it doesn't apply.... Scuba Mar 2012 #46
They don't nadinbrzezinski Mar 2012 #53
Yeah, those darn typesetters, always spinning the message.... Scuba Mar 2012 #54
Gannett's Principles of Ethical Conduct mzteris Mar 2012 #3
No, it doesn't nobodyspecial Mar 2012 #5
What's the difference between signing a petition and voting? Fawke Em Mar 2012 #6
Lots of reporters don't vote. nobodyspecial Mar 2012 #9
IIRC, Keith Olbermann doesn't vote, for reasons along those lines. n/t Ian David Mar 2012 #18
I find that hard to believe considering the big flap over his donating 1monster Mar 2012 #21
At least, that USED to be the case. Ian David Mar 2012 #33
The Vote Is Private...Petitions Are Not... KharmaTrain Mar 2012 #47
so they're not allowed to vote? n/t mzteris Mar 2012 #11
Some reporters do not vote nadinbrzezinski Mar 2012 #38
that's a bit ridiculous. mzteris Mar 2012 #50
No, it's nothing to do with employers nadinbrzezinski Mar 2012 #52
not sure where the "violation" is mzteris Mar 2012 #4
That is their statement as a newspaper, not the personnel policy nobodyspecial Mar 2012 #7
I'm sorry, but I think you're mistaken mzteris Mar 2012 #14
I never said you could nobodyspecial Mar 2012 #17
Signing A Petition Is Not Voting... KharmaTrain Mar 2012 #49
Not correct cthulu2016 Mar 2012 #10
Thank you for the good examples nobodyspecial Mar 2012 #12
And I bet they don't discourage investigation regarding their advertisers angstlessk Mar 2012 #8
The recall signatures never should have been made public. postulater Mar 2012 #13
There never was any assurance or promise of secrecy nobodyspecial Mar 2012 #16
I am disagreeing with the GAB policy of making the signatures public. postulater Mar 2012 #19
From the policy: nobodyspecial Mar 2012 #23
I disagree with both policies but agree that postulater Mar 2012 #41
That is not just GAB policy. former9thward Mar 2012 #34
If it is then I disagree with that. postulater Mar 2012 #35
From the NY Times nobodyspecial Mar 2012 #15
And we all know just how impartial the NYT is. hobbit709 Mar 2012 #22
Well, both the right and left are regularly and equally mad at their policies nobodyspecial Mar 2012 #24
"your side"???? Are calling the previous poster a right-winger? Careful, someone's about to alert. Scuba Mar 2012 #26
I wasn't calling anybody a right-winger nobodyspecial Mar 2012 #27
Anyone who's dealt with me more than five minutes would respond like this hobbit709 Mar 2012 #30
1st Amendment PSUDem Mar 2012 #31
So a journalist does not have the right to vote? jwirr Mar 2012 #28
Have you read the thread? nobodyspecial Mar 2012 #29
What publications are a part of Gannett? We need to enact some 'serious measures' Zalatix Mar 2012 #36
You might want to boycott every paper in the country nadinbrzezinski Mar 2012 #39
Yeah but you're on the DU, if you're a reporter, wouldn't they get you for that? Zalatix Mar 2012 #43
Reporters have a private life nadinbrzezinski Mar 2012 #44
Uh ya gots a copy of those Gannett's Principles of Ethical Conduct? benld74 Mar 2012 #40
I don't equal signing a petition with campaigning or proseletizing Poiuyt Mar 2012 #42
From the NY Times nobodyspecial Mar 2012 #45
If you were for ethical conduct Genia, you would have signed the petition also. mmonk Mar 2012 #48
Policies like this are wrong ibegurpard Mar 2012 #51
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Gannett vows 'serious mea...»Reply #15