Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Alex Sink said we should "dust off the Simpson-Bowles." No strong stand on Social Security. [View all]pa28
(6,145 posts)2. Ahh, now Paul Begala's call to not pass blame around makes more sense.
Sink was peddling "very serious people" third way BS and the voters stayed home in droves.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
62 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Alex Sink said we should "dust off the Simpson-Bowles." No strong stand on Social Security. [View all]
madfloridian
Mar 2014
OP
a 2 time loser they want to foist on the voters again -- WTF are dems thinking? nt
xchrom
Mar 2014
#4
How many times can this Blue Dog lose, & still be considered a "viable" candidate? Viable, for whom?
blkmusclmachine
Mar 2014
#7
What do you call a Democratic candidate who runs on the Third Way platform?
Jack Rabbit
Mar 2014
#19
She suggests that Social Security is one of the causes of an increasing deficit?
RVN VET
Mar 2014
#23
Gee. Running a weak Republican against a strong Republican in a Republican district...
Scootaloo
Mar 2014
#27
And the reason to be bipartisan is????? I see not one positive thing. nt
Sarah Ibarruri
Mar 2014
#30
I think we could use more than 2 parties, but you're right about one thing -
Sarah Ibarruri
Mar 2014
#62