Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)"Notice that conservatives aren't arguing that Trayvon should've been packing? I wonder why..." [View all]
Now here's a good question:

Think about it. Every other situation in which an innocent person gets gunned down there is a cacophony of gun nuts screeching that if only this person had been armed he could have defended himself. It's been the basis of every concealed and open carry argument for the last couple of decades.
And yet, in this case, nothing. No impassioned appeals for loosening the gun laws so that ordinary Americans could go to the store in the evening to buy some candy and an iced tea without getting stalked and shot by some unhinged vigilante. No solemn op-eds about the dangers for average Americans when venturing unarmed into the streets of their own neighborhoods. No fiery speeches from Wayne LaPierre insisting that if only everyone in the neighborhood had been armed with submachine guns they could have run outside and started firing immediately upon hearing the screams for help. Nada. Why do you suppose that is?
http://digbysblog.blogspot.com/2012/03/whats-missing-from-trayvon-martin.html

Think about it. Every other situation in which an innocent person gets gunned down there is a cacophony of gun nuts screeching that if only this person had been armed he could have defended himself. It's been the basis of every concealed and open carry argument for the last couple of decades.
And yet, in this case, nothing. No impassioned appeals for loosening the gun laws so that ordinary Americans could go to the store in the evening to buy some candy and an iced tea without getting stalked and shot by some unhinged vigilante. No solemn op-eds about the dangers for average Americans when venturing unarmed into the streets of their own neighborhoods. No fiery speeches from Wayne LaPierre insisting that if only everyone in the neighborhood had been armed with submachine guns they could have run outside and started firing immediately upon hearing the screams for help. Nada. Why do you suppose that is?
http://digbysblog.blogspot.com/2012/03/whats-missing-from-trayvon-martin.html
62 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
"Notice that conservatives aren't arguing that Trayvon should've been packing? I wonder why..." [View all]
phantom power
Mar 2012
OP
Those who advocate for open-carry never think about what people should do who are under-age,
JDPriestly
Mar 2012
#24
If you post on DU, you probably don't have racist friends. That's the difference.
yardwork
Mar 2012
#33
I'm waiting to hear you speak up...hello? Is this mike on? Let me try again...hello?
CTyankee
Mar 2012
#5
Seems somehow ironic. Martin wasnt legally able to defend himself with a weapon
rhett o rick
Mar 2012
#14
Of course, you are arguing against noone. Do you support Zimmerman's actions or not?
rhett o rick
Mar 2012
#38
Wow, all I said was that it is ironic that the kook got to carry a gun to defend himself
rhett o rick
Mar 2012
#37
I consider the possibility of Trayvon carrying a firearm to be a moot question.
slackmaster
Mar 2012
#40
So All Of A Sudden, You Gun Enthusiasts Are Backing Firearms Laws. Imagine That.
Paladin
Mar 2012
#16
Because he is a minor and I guess they aren't prepared yet to argue that minors should
LisaL
Mar 2012
#34
If a white minor was stalked, hunted and killed by a black guy twice his size...
Cali_Democrat
Mar 2012
#43
The uncomfortable squirming in this thread that this question invoked is delicious to see.
Number23
Mar 2012
#45
And we aren't hearing much about "victim's rights" these days either. HMMMMM
JDPriestly
Mar 2012
#57