Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

morningfog

(18,115 posts)
27. I think that is what is bringing the statement now. Other countires (namely US) are more heavily
Sat Mar 15, 2014, 12:58 AM
Mar 2014

involved.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Now the questions really start. By whom? Why? Are the passengers still alive? And of course, morningfog Mar 2014 #1
And if they are alive, who goes to get them? Renew Deal Mar 2014 #2
This is all absolutely surreal. morningfog Mar 2014 #3
This truly is surreal. Cooley Hurd Mar 2014 #7
Weirdest thing I've seen in a while Aerows Mar 2014 #38
Dust off the Israelis' old Entebbe plan. MADem Mar 2014 #4
Totally just my opinion...did the hijackers plant witnesses? rainbow4321 Mar 2014 #77
Could be...or it could be "helpful" people who just want to be a part of history... MADem Mar 2014 #78
My biggest question Aerows Mar 2014 #36
Really? Take a wild guess. maced666 Mar 2014 #70
How about you give me your wild answer, because I have none. morningfog Mar 2014 #115
Link to AP: morningfog Mar 2014 #5
? Adam051188 Mar 2014 #6
Are you Malaysian? Chan790 Mar 2014 #14
If the U.S. knows where that plane is, Keefer Mar 2014 #49
Maintaining appearances? Chan790 Mar 2014 #56
I don't know why everybody thinks satellites can see everything. Travis_0004 Mar 2014 #62
it's all part of the charade. they're giving hints along the lines of "you're getting warmer" functioning_cog Mar 2014 #67
Amazing, isn't it? Every time they could actually prove their claims of how this whole meta data sabrina 1 Mar 2014 #26
On the contrary, its the corporations you buy from who know your shopping kelliekat44 Mar 2014 #87
really? JeaneRaye Mar 2014 #61
it's a play on a word Skittles Mar 2014 #80
For once, when worst since 911 crosses somebody's lips nadinbrzezinski Mar 2014 #8
Skill and planning. It is about to get intense. morningfog Mar 2014 #11
Yup nadinbrzezinski Mar 2014 #12
At least we learned that after all the security checks go west young man Mar 2014 #30
That was not TSA nadinbrzezinski Mar 2014 #31
The US has applied rules to most European countries go west young man Mar 2014 #39
Yes, but malasya is not in Europe. nadinbrzezinski Mar 2014 #42
You may be missing my point Nadine.. go west young man Mar 2014 #48
I am not missing your point nadinbrzezinski Mar 2014 #52
Actually, US TSA runs 250 million checks against the Interpol database every year, pnwmom Mar 2014 #91
From the Washington Post link. go west young man Mar 2014 #98
Our TSA/Customs is one of the national organizations that have been using the database. pnwmom Mar 2014 #101
I'm not sure that's accurate Renew Deal Mar 2014 #63
Here we go again. We hate when the government tracks us except we hate when they don't nt kelliekat44 Mar 2014 #88
The article was referring to airlines checking, not governmental entities like the TSA. pnwmom Mar 2014 #90
Oh and I don't know about that. nadinbrzezinski Mar 2014 #47
The US doesn't check every traveler in the whole world, that's why. pnwmom Mar 2014 #89
Here's where your misunderstanding is coming from, I think. pnwmom Mar 2014 #92
What? The Dog and Pony show has been shown to be...................... tavalon Mar 2014 #74
(self-delete) pnwmom Mar 2014 #84
Wrong. The US uses the Interpol database more than any other country in the world. pnwmom Mar 2014 #85
Wrong, if you fly international you know that nadinbrzezinski Mar 2014 #105
US airport security run 250 million checks against the Interpol database annually, pnwmom Mar 2014 #83
do we have a translator here? snooper2 Mar 2014 #110
Satellites are very good at seeing what they are directly looking at. If they are not directly looki uppityperson Mar 2014 #117
Yes, it is "surreal".. :( Cha Mar 2014 #9
A lot of mixed emotion right now. Hope that the passengers are alive, dread about what the morningfog Mar 2014 #16
Few reporting this. nt Logical Mar 2014 #10
AP has it and it has been picked up by LA Times, WaPo, CBSNews.... morningfog Mar 2014 #13
They've just broken into the 20/20 program on ABC to report it... countryjake Mar 2014 #44
The Guardian has it... countryjake Mar 2014 #54
I hope this isn't true. nt Sarah Ibarruri Mar 2014 #15
I'm thinking the families wold rather have live hostages than fish food for relatives. Hassin Bin Sober Mar 2014 #22
Yeah, like Hope is still alive. Cha Mar 2014 #23
I just hope the passengers weren't tortured to death. nt Sarah Ibarruri Mar 2014 #35
is this official? annoynomous source? mackerel Mar 2014 #17
It is an anonymous official, as of now. But, it is consistent with everything we've heard morningfog Mar 2014 #20
Malaysian Prime Minister is going to make a statement shortly. morningfog Mar 2014 #18
And I know it's FCN but, the video with flight path nadinbrzezinski Mar 2014 #19
FWIW the Malaysian prime minister is supposed to give an update at 1:30 AM ET herding cats Mar 2014 #21
All of us would like a "happy" ending to this story. mn9driver Mar 2014 #24
I don't disagree that the odds are bad. However, morningfog Mar 2014 #28
True mn9driver Mar 2014 #46
Until we get a better idea who may have done this fujiyama Mar 2014 #25
I think that is what is bringing the statement now. Other countires (namely US) are more heavily morningfog Mar 2014 #27
I just noticed the PM is giving a presser fujiyama Mar 2014 #29
Saying: ''It is conclusive.'' DeSwiss Mar 2014 #32
I wonder if there is something more to the conclusion. morningfog Mar 2014 #33
My point is one of semantics, maybe...... DeSwiss Mar 2014 #43
There is this live update from Telegraph: morningfog Mar 2014 #37
That makes sense. n/t DeSwiss Mar 2014 #45
I think everyone is sharing what they know more now. herding cats Mar 2014 #58
True. nt Cali_Democrat Mar 2014 #53
Well that answers one question, but not the biggest one Aerows Mar 2014 #34
unfortunately probably on the bottom of the indian ocean. DCBob Mar 2014 #40
I hope not Aerows Mar 2014 #41
All those folks would need to be fed.. HipChick Mar 2014 #51
if its in the bottom of the ocean they are all dead. DCBob Mar 2014 #59
There was another mention on cable this evening - a report out of China Samantha Mar 2014 #55
That was 140 miles EAST of where the plane turned off communications Renew Deal Mar 2014 #64
Since it appears more likely it was hijacked herding cats Mar 2014 #50
Weird, weird, weird Aerows Mar 2014 #66
You've pretty much got it right. herding cats Mar 2014 #69
I feel sorry for the loved ones Aerows Mar 2014 #75
I keep putting myself in their place. herding cats Mar 2014 #76
Are these the same government officials that invited the shaman to the airport, where he performed jtuck004 Mar 2014 #57
Sydney Morning Herald says that Malaysian PM Najib Razak... countryjake Mar 2014 #60
It appears the 'how' has been answered. Jenoch Mar 2014 #65
Al Jazeera will televise the Malaysia PM's news conference amandabeech Mar 2014 #68
It's Live Streaming online at ABCnews and Livestation, too countryjake Mar 2014 #72
Honestly that has been my thought since this began azurnoir Mar 2014 #71
Just as I suspected. I posted saying it was probably a hijacking on Tuesday quinnox Mar 2014 #73
I agreed. Now remind me again B2G Mar 2014 #97
Me too Iwasthere Mar 2014 #111
My guess IDemo Mar 2014 #79
'unmistakable'? I don't think so muriel_volestrangler Mar 2014 #82
The 40,000 ft figure was from engine data which may not have been accurate IDemo Mar 2014 #86
Many pilots are posting on pilots' forums that they don't think a 777 can reach 45,000 feet muriel_volestrangler Mar 2014 #93
The 777 is capable of cruising at altitudes up to 43,100 feet TorchTheWitch Mar 2014 #120
Not necessarily. They might have been trying to avoid radar detection. pnwmom Mar 2014 #103
Avoiding whose radar? IDemo Mar 2014 #104
Then why couldn't they track the plane? Why do they still have no idea pnwmom Mar 2014 #106
The radar has limited range IDemo Mar 2014 #107
Unless they were taking it to high altitude for a reason Iwasthere Mar 2014 #112
Yep. That's it exactly. B2G Mar 2014 #122
Missing jet: Piracy would require special skills dipsydoodle Mar 2014 #81
Unfortunately, I don't think this changes what happened to the plane ok_cpu Mar 2014 #94
I can't imagine such a sophisticated plan not having a landing plan. morningfog Mar 2014 #95
I don't disagree at all. ok_cpu Mar 2014 #96
They took the plane to use for some other purpose later distantearlywarning Mar 2014 #99
Of course, the number of places a 777 could be clandestinely taken, serviced, refueled HereSince1628 Mar 2014 #114
Terror in the sky: MH370 deliberately diverted by an experienced pilot FarCenter Mar 2014 #100
WHy not just crash it? morningfog Mar 2014 #109
A crash would just be a crash. This will be a mystery and enduring legend. FarCenter Mar 2014 #113
Silly me, I'm still holding out hope that the people are alive somewhere. Zorra Mar 2014 #102
pissing everybody off... "China demands Malaysia give more accurate information on plane" Baclava Mar 2014 #108
wasnt it china that dropped those bogus sat photos on us a few days ago?? DCBob Mar 2014 #116
They aren't running the operation and two-thirds of those on-board were Chinese. Baclava Mar 2014 #118
sure.. but they themselves sent many on a wild goose chase with those photos. DCBob Mar 2014 #119
This story gets weirder by the minute. Warren DeMontague Mar 2014 #121
I am betting the passengers put up one heck of a fight. roamer65 Mar 2014 #123
ABC/CNN Breaking: Focus now on"deliberate action" of pilots (live now) anneboleyn Mar 2014 #124
With it being an overnight flight and if it was done by the pilot, none would morningfog Mar 2014 #125
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Missing Malaysia Airlines...»Reply #27