Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)The Answer Is Turnout: Vote, You Jackass [View all]
Last edited Sat Mar 15, 2014, 05:50 PM - Edit history (1)

(Photo: Tom Arthur)
The Answer Is Turnout: Vote, You Jackass
By William Rivers Pitt
BuzzFlash at Truthout | Op-Ed
Saturday 15 March 2014
My mother is an official for a town nearby, and this past week was a voting week on what are called "Warrant Articles," which is New Hampshire-ese for ballot initiatives and budget proposals. The town she works for has a small but very vocal and very active contingent of Free Staters who believe in conspiracy theories like the UN is seeking to take over the town by way of Agenda 21. They show up at every town meeting, and always always always always vote.
...and they win, more often than not, because the people with their heads screwed on right don't bother to summon the energy to raise their hand once a year. The Agenda 21 people are a small segment of the populace, but they always show up.
Bill Clinton, in his first inauguration speech, said, "There is nothing wrong with America that cannot be fixed by what is right with America." One of the things that is right with America is your right to vote, and when I hear people say voting does not matter, does not make a difference, it makes me want to tear my teeth out.
Math: the coocoobirds who think dinosaurs don't exist because they aren't mentioned in the Bible comprise, give or take, about 12% of the voting population in America. They are a small minority within a minority party. When only 50% of the voting population shows up to vote in a presidential election year, that 12% doubles to 25%, because those 12%-ers go to the polls even if it is raining live jaguars outside...which means any right-wing candidate who says the right things about Jesus, fetuses and guns is halfway to the 50.1% needed for victory before they put their pants on come election day. To call that an enormous advantage is to devalue the definition of "enormous."
...and in midterm elections - the ones that decide the entire House and a third of the Senate - turnout tends to sit somewhere around 35%, which means that 12% dead-bang guaranteed turnout actually flexes to about 40%. Which explains the current House of Representatives pretty succinctly.
So don't don't don't don't just don't you dare tell me that voting doesn't matter. That is a heaping crock of lazy crap. In point of fact, the decline this nation has endured over the last fifty years, the empowerment of the moneyed few over the many, and the rise in power of Taliban Christianity, exactly and precisely matches the dwindling turnout numbers on election day...which, by the bye, has a direct relationship to the "lesser of two evils" candidates you holier-than-thous refuse to turn out for. If you don't like your choices, it's because you didn't make a choice in the last election, and the one before, and the one before. Nature, and politics, abhor a vacuum. If you don't like what has filled it, non-voter, find a mirror and stare into the eyes of the reason why.
If you don't vote, you are responsible for this. If you vote, you can fix this. I have a fever-dream involving 80-90% turnout across the board in two consecutive elections, midterm and then general. Such a one-two punch event would change the country overnight, and these candidates you can't stomach would scurry back to the dark corners they came from. That kind of turnout would obliterate the power of money in politics in one fell swoop.
The rest: http://www.truth-out.org/buzzflash/commentary/william-rivers-pitt-the-answer-is-turnout-vote-you-jackass
66 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
A lot votes Republican and this is why we have Ted Cruz. I agree the best suited
Thinkingabout
Mar 2014
#40
Pathetic surrender and loss is what happens when we define progressive with the ..
MindMover
Mar 2014
#45
GOTV. I didn't vote one "non-important" election, school levy failed by 11 votes
uppityperson
Mar 2014
#4
In our system the way to get the lawmakers' attention is with a campaign donation
Fumesucker
Mar 2014
#20
You didn't get perfect purity, but you got PROGRESS, and a damn lot of it. No more WHINING.
RBInMaine
Mar 2014
#23
Yes the answer to vacillating and prevaricating politicians is that their opponents are worse
Fumesucker
Mar 2014
#55
I agree that we should all vote but not sure that it will make a difference.
rhett o rick
Mar 2014
#8
And that goes especially for those who live in areas that they have been making it harder to vote.
jwirr
Mar 2014
#12
For example, a politician who promises to make every effort to abolish SS, and does? n/t
Martin Eden
Mar 2014
#41
... doesn't fit the definition of 'dynastic.' Sorry, I know all the cool progressive use the term...
wyldwolf
Mar 2014
#58
Always vote. Always. If you can't bring yourself to vote for a person on the ballot
Autumn
Mar 2014
#43
Women have been kicked around by GOP Taliban and why women continue to vote
Thinkingabout
Mar 2014
#51