Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Car Dealers Are Terrified of Tesla’s Plan to Eliminate Oil Changes [View all]kristopher
(29,798 posts)30. Elon Musk's Letter to the People of New Jersey
On Tuesday, under pressure from the New Jersey auto dealer lobby to protect its monopoly, the New Jersey Motor Vehicle Commission, composed of political appointees of the Governor, ended your right to purchase vehicles at a manufacturer store within the state. Governor Christie had promised that this would be put to a vote of the elected state legislature, which is the appropriate way to change the law. When it became apparent to the auto dealer lobby that this approach would not succeed, they cut a backroom deal with the Governor to circumvent the legislative process and pass a regulation that is fundamentally contrary to the intent of the law.
It is worth examining the history of these laws to understand why they exist, as the auto dealer franchise laws were originally put in place for a just cause and are now being twisted to an unjust purpose. Many decades ago, the incumbent auto manufacturers sold franchises to generate capital and gain a salesforce. The franchisees then further invested a lot of their money and time in building up the dealerships. Thats a fair deal and it should not be broken. However, some of the big auto companies later engaged in pressure tactics to get the franchisees to sell their dealerships back at a low price. The franchisees rightly sought protection from their state legislatures, which resulted in the laws on the books today throughout the United States (these laws are not present anywhere else in the world).
The intent was simply to prevent a fair and longstanding deal between an existing auto company and its dealers from being broken, not to prevent a new company that has no franchisees from selling directly to consumers. In most states, the laws are reasonable and clear. In a handful of states, the laws were written in an overzealous or ambiguous manner. When all auto companies sold through franchises, this didnt really matter. However, when Tesla came along as a new company with no existing franchisees, the auto dealers, who possess vastly more resources and influence than Tesla, nonetheless sought to force us to sell through them.
The reason that we did not choose to do this is that the auto dealers have a fundamental conflict of interest between promoting gasoline cars, which constitute virtually all of their revenue, and electric cars, which constitute virtually none. Moreover, it is much harder to sell a new technology car from a new company when people are so used to the old. Inevitably, they revert to selling whats easy and it is game over for the new company.
The evidence is clear: when has an American startup auto company ever succeeded by selling through auto dealers...
It is worth examining the history of these laws to understand why they exist, as the auto dealer franchise laws were originally put in place for a just cause and are now being twisted to an unjust purpose. Many decades ago, the incumbent auto manufacturers sold franchises to generate capital and gain a salesforce. The franchisees then further invested a lot of their money and time in building up the dealerships. Thats a fair deal and it should not be broken. However, some of the big auto companies later engaged in pressure tactics to get the franchisees to sell their dealerships back at a low price. The franchisees rightly sought protection from their state legislatures, which resulted in the laws on the books today throughout the United States (these laws are not present anywhere else in the world).
The intent was simply to prevent a fair and longstanding deal between an existing auto company and its dealers from being broken, not to prevent a new company that has no franchisees from selling directly to consumers. In most states, the laws are reasonable and clear. In a handful of states, the laws were written in an overzealous or ambiguous manner. When all auto companies sold through franchises, this didnt really matter. However, when Tesla came along as a new company with no existing franchisees, the auto dealers, who possess vastly more resources and influence than Tesla, nonetheless sought to force us to sell through them.
The reason that we did not choose to do this is that the auto dealers have a fundamental conflict of interest between promoting gasoline cars, which constitute virtually all of their revenue, and electric cars, which constitute virtually none. Moreover, it is much harder to sell a new technology car from a new company when people are so used to the old. Inevitably, they revert to selling whats easy and it is game over for the new company.
The evidence is clear: when has an American startup auto company ever succeeded by selling through auto dealers...
http://www.teslamotors.com/blog/people-new-jersey
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
96 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
This is the future of automobiles, and thankfully it cannot happen soon enough ...
MindMover
Mar 2014
#1
and how many million vehicles were built and on the roads in those days ... ???
MindMover
Mar 2014
#6
Cars were made for the oil industry. That's why the electric car was killed over 100 years ago. nt
valerief
Mar 2014
#16
Yeah, that's where I learned about it (I have the DVD). All those electric trolleys that provided
valerief
Mar 2014
#19
Tesla S has a base price just under 60K. For that price, they should come over, fix the car
Bluenorthwest
Mar 2014
#21
Teslas don’t have any of the parts that force you to take your car in for “regularly scheduled
Bluenorthwest
Mar 2014
#20
The dealers are really pissed because they are not involved in the biggest cut...
madinmaryland
Mar 2014
#24
I don't disagree that they can be a very lucrative business. On the other hand
madinmaryland
Mar 2014
#49
You're saying an auto dealer that can't get electric cars would recommend them to his customers?
jmowreader
Mar 2014
#73
No, I'm saying if the dealer wants to exist, they better give the manufacturer a
AtheistCrusader
Mar 2014
#75
Terrific Post...I really hadn't thought about this ...of taking it into the shop
Stuart G
Mar 2014
#39
"An app on 4 wheels"? Great, that means it can crash. All kidding aside, I wish him luck.
7962
Mar 2014
#42
I really look forward to the day they start making Teslas that I can afford
Bjorn Against
Mar 2014
#43
The transition from piston engine to electric cars is already happening before our eyes.
GETPLANING
Mar 2014
#46
In a week where the big auto news is the average American can't afford a new car or truck
Johonny
Mar 2014
#68
I started research into unethical internet behavior watching shorts during the late 90s.
kristopher
Mar 2014
#92