Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Finnmccool

(74 posts)
14. You mean this Kitimat?
Sat Mar 15, 2014, 03:40 PM
Mar 2014

Tanker moratorium in British Columbia[edit]


Proposed tanker routes and prohibition zone.


Proposed oil tanker routes to service the Northern Gateway Pipelines, and the tanker prohibition zone.
There has been an informal moratorium on large tanker traffic in Dixon Entrance, Hecate Strait, and the Queen Charlotte Sound since 1972.[49] Since then, the federal and provincial governments have commissioned periodic studies to reassess whether to lift the tanker moratorium. Each study has concluded that the risk of tanker spills is too high. In 2003–2004, the federal government initiated a three-part review process, including a scientific review by the Royal Society of Canada (the RSC report), a First Nations engagement process (the Brooks Report), and a public review process (the Priddle Panel). The RSC report concluded that "the present restriction on tanker traffic along the West Coast of British Columbia should be maintained for the time being[50]

In 2009, the Canadian government's position was that there is no moratorium on tanker traffic in the coast waters of British Columbia.[51] However, on December 7, 2010, Canada's environmental watchdog (Scott Vaughan, commissioner of the environment and sustainable development) in a damning report stated "Canada's government is not ready to handle a major oil spill from a tanker, in part because its emergency response plan is out of date".[52]

In December 2010, the federal House of Commons passed a non-binding motion to ban bulk oil tanker traffic in the Dixon Entrance, Hecate Strait and Queen Charlotte Sound.[53][54][55][56]

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Isn't the bigger fredamae Mar 2014 #1
The answer to your question used to be delivered in brown paper bags. Now it's called Tierra_y_Libertad Mar 2014 #4
MONEY. Rex Mar 2014 #10
huh? FreeJoe Mar 2014 #2
TransCanada says right in their 2009 Finnmccool Mar 2014 #5
Locally FreeJoe Mar 2014 #25
At least a .20 increase in the midwest Finnmccool Mar 2014 #28
Here it is in their own words Finnmccool Mar 2014 #30
And that will lower prices elsewhere FreeJoe Mar 2014 #32
No they don't want to build a pipeline Finnmccool Mar 2014 #34
Higher for them, lower for the buyers FreeJoe Mar 2014 #36
No they don't want to lower the prices somewhere else Finnmccool Mar 2014 #37
Of course they don't want to FreeJoe Mar 2014 #40
"passing less than they were paging" I don't have any idea what that means Finnmccool Mar 2014 #42
Sorry for the typo FreeJoe Mar 2014 #43
That wasn't an OP that was their testimony Finnmccool Mar 2014 #35
The only way the tarsands companies can make money off the bitumen arikara Mar 2014 #21
Sort of true, but not really FreeJoe Mar 2014 #26
Prices in the heartland will go up The Straight Story Mar 2014 #33
The pipeline from the Midwest to Texas is done FreeJoe Mar 2014 #38
This is the same thing that Professor Lakoff tries to do. Savannahmann Mar 2014 #3
Please explain how it will be exported Finnmccool Mar 2014 #6
The Oil Sands are in Alberta Canada. Savannahmann Mar 2014 #7
Canada has banned oil tankers Finnmccool Mar 2014 #8
Sorry ports not waters Finnmccool Mar 2014 #9
You may want to let the Canadians know that, because they don't seem to be aware of it. Savannahmann Mar 2014 #12
You mean this Kitimat? Finnmccool Mar 2014 #14
So it's informal, and no such ban exists Savannahmann Mar 2014 #15
If they have so many tankers coming why do we get all their oil? Finnmccool Mar 2014 #19
BTW could you post a link where a super tanker went to Ottawa Finnmccool Mar 2014 #20
Northern Gateway has to go over all the first nations arikara Mar 2014 #22
Us or China Calista241 Mar 2014 #16
Rail, most likely NickB79 Mar 2014 #17
I Have to take issue with one of your points A HERETIC I AM Mar 2014 #18
I thought I said. Savannahmann Mar 2014 #24
Keystone XL is being marketed to the US public with the rubric of "Energy Independence" Scootaloo Mar 2014 #27
Well, it would require giving up all that nice oil money to their campaigns. Cleita Mar 2014 #11
Maybe you haven't noticed, but telling the truth hasn't been in style since Rex Mar 2014 #13
The Keystone southern leg from Cushing, OK to Nederland, TX began transporting oil Jan 22, 2014. FarCenter Mar 2014 #23
the oil may not be for export but the refined product is another story elehhhhna Mar 2014 #29
We export more refined product than we import, but those flows are much smaller than crude flows FarCenter Mar 2014 #31
If The Democrats Told The Truth about The Pipeline Dirty Socialist Mar 2014 #39
The logical reasoning behind it raising fuel to $10/Gal would be helpful seveneyes Mar 2014 #41
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»If Democrats would just t...»Reply #14