Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Wells Fargo caught with "how to defraud homeowners" manual. [View all]ms.smiler
(551 posts)99. dixiegrrrrl, I'm sure you'll remember this Salon report.
Your Mortgage Documents are Fake
http://www.salon.com/2013/08/12/your_mortgage_documents_are_fake/
From the article:
A newly unsealed lawsuit, which banks settled in 2012 for $95 million, actually offers a different reason, providing a key answer to one of the persistent riddles of the financial crisis and its aftermath. The lawsuit states that banks resorted to fake documents because they could not legally establish true ownership of the loans when trying to foreclose.
This reality, which banks did not contest but instead settled out of court, means that tens of millions of mortgages in America still lack a legitimate chain of ownership, with implications far into the future. And if Congress, supported by the Obama administration, goes back to the same housing finance system, with the same corrupt private entities who broke the nations private property system back in business packaging mortgages, then shame on all of us.
Mr. Papantonio interviewed David Dayen on his article. There's quite a contrast between the reality of securitized mortgages and Fannie's fanciful explanation contained in my previous post.
And this is why Ive asked homeowners who are dutifully making mortgage payments to pause and consider that if it takes that level of fraud addressed above to simulate ownership of a loan in order to foreclose, what level of fraud is necessary at this moment to simulate ownership of their mortgage loans?
http://www.salon.com/2013/08/12/your_mortgage_documents_are_fake/
From the article:
A newly unsealed lawsuit, which banks settled in 2012 for $95 million, actually offers a different reason, providing a key answer to one of the persistent riddles of the financial crisis and its aftermath. The lawsuit states that banks resorted to fake documents because they could not legally establish true ownership of the loans when trying to foreclose.
This reality, which banks did not contest but instead settled out of court, means that tens of millions of mortgages in America still lack a legitimate chain of ownership, with implications far into the future. And if Congress, supported by the Obama administration, goes back to the same housing finance system, with the same corrupt private entities who broke the nations private property system back in business packaging mortgages, then shame on all of us.
Mr. Papantonio interviewed David Dayen on his article. There's quite a contrast between the reality of securitized mortgages and Fannie's fanciful explanation contained in my previous post.
And this is why Ive asked homeowners who are dutifully making mortgage payments to pause and consider that if it takes that level of fraud addressed above to simulate ownership of a loan in order to foreclose, what level of fraud is necessary at this moment to simulate ownership of their mortgage loans?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
101 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
"Yeah, a buffer. The family had a lot of buffers." - Willi Cicci , Corleone Family "button man"
Hassin Bin Sober
Mar 2014
#29
I have to check my HD for the sourcing - which is a Rolling Stone's article.
truedelphi
Mar 2014
#88
Agree, they guys know how to play the game. It's all a calculated risk for them, jail
RKP5637
Mar 2014
#28
Yes, actually, that would certainly be a better solution for those with insatiable greed! n/t
RKP5637
Mar 2014
#47
After allowing the previous administration's war criminals amnesty, fraud is small potatoes.
Enthusiast
Mar 2014
#71
As your article mentions:Hedge Fund "Blackstone" is into this. Buying up houses all over country
KoKo
Mar 2014
#9
I tried to join a class action suit two years ago, and for some reason was turned down.
Fuddnik
Mar 2014
#75
dixiegrrrrl, I greatly value your contribution to DU, you are well informed and
ms.smiler
Mar 2014
#54
dixiegrrrrl, goodness, do I have a long way to go to catch up to the number of points made by you.
ms.smiler
Mar 2014
#85
I'm going to have to look up some information before I can answer any of these questions
Victor_c3
Mar 2014
#74
AnalystInParadise, rather than a strategic default, may I suggest a strategic Quiet Title?
ms.smiler
Mar 2014
#55
And, justice Dept. is too busy spying on the meta-habits of American people to care...
pragmatic_dem
Mar 2014
#84