Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
33. They might if they had funding.
Sun Mar 16, 2014, 07:50 PM
Mar 2014

I don't know about you, but I find it dissapointing to learn that research on fallout from Fukushima does not get funded in the United States -- even after radioactive sulfur from Fukushima was monitored in Southern California.



Ocean water off La Jolla coast being monitored (and not) for Fukushima radiation

By Pat Sherman
La Jolla Light, Feb. 4, 2014

EXCERPT...

In 2011 Thiemens and a crew of UCSD atmospheric chemists reported the first quantitative measurement of the amount of radiation leaked from the damaged nuclear reactor in Fukushima, following the devastating earthquake and tsunami there.

Their estimate was based on radioactive sulfur that wafted across the Pacific Ocean after operators of the damaged reactor had to cool overheated fuel with seawater — causing a chemical reaction between byproducts of nuclear fission and chlorine ions in the saltwater.

Thiemens has, for the past several years, unsuccessfully sought to obtain grant funding to follow-up his research, first reported on Aug. 15 2011 in the online edition of the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

However, he said neither the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Environmental Protection Agency, California Air Resources Board or National Academy of Sciences (of which he is a member) were interested in funding additional research to measure the Fukushima fallout.

“It’s probably one of these things that just fell through the cracks,” Thiemens said. “It doesn’t quite fall under classical (research criteria).”

CONTINUED...

http://www.lajollalight.com/2014/02/04/ocean-water-off-la-jolla-coast-being-monitored-for-fukushima-radiation/



So, there's that part of the reality.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Yet some morons insist CNN and MSNBC are worse geek tragedy Mar 2014 #1
The big difference betweetn RT and CNN is Cha Mar 2014 #22
foolishness: But the translation isn't a direct threat, rather newthinking Mar 2014 #30
I was thinking of a recent failed presidential candidate. pangaia Mar 2014 #32
Speech act. Igel Mar 2014 #42
Hell, Fukishima will do that sooner than later anyhow.n/t dixiegrrrrl Mar 2014 #2
Said no scientist ever. nt geek tragedy Mar 2014 #4
They might if they had funding. Octafish Mar 2014 #33
This is what empires look like when they're falling. joshcryer Mar 2014 #3
Shows the importance of getting the nukes deactivated and destroyed. geek tragedy Mar 2014 #5
I honestly don't think they will go *that* far. AverageJoe90 Mar 2014 #27
Are they putting steriods in the water over sufrommich Mar 2014 #6
Well, their dictator does wrestle bears. nt geek tragedy Mar 2014 #7
Elevating the tough talk doesn't help reduce the rhetoric seveneyes Mar 2014 #19
No one in the US is escalating. Neither are they being bullied. nt geek tragedy Mar 2014 #23
The US? karynnj Mar 2014 #24
Dr Evil says the hearts of gay people should be burned after Bluenorthwest Mar 2014 #8
They grow increasingly reactionary.nt sufrommich Mar 2014 #10
Let me guess, this is worse than threatening to "obliterate" Iran? Fumesucker Mar 2014 #9
as in Bomb bomb bomb Iran malaise Mar 2014 #16
Actually I was thinking of a Secretary of State Fumesucker Mar 2014 #18
who was jsut in Ukraine dixiegrrrrl Mar 2014 #37
I noticed some Putin's DUwater carriers arely staircase Mar 2014 #11
... Rex Mar 2014 #12
the grey suit in the video does not help wheniwasincongress Mar 2014 #26
Blogwriter is a bit out of date - RIA Novosti became defunct last year. dipsydoodle Mar 2014 #13
So this guy is in charge of rt.com geek tragedy Mar 2014 #14
It is an GP6971 Mar 2014 #20
Well one Sarah Palin suggested that the only thing better than a bad guy with a malaise Mar 2014 #15
Well I do hope Kerry or whomever does not try more tough talk seveneyes Mar 2014 #17
Who cares what you think? Sometimes tough talk is a requirement functioning_cog Mar 2014 #21
Tough talk GP6971 Mar 2014 #25
You could have left off that first sentence and been a lot more credible sounding. snappyturtle Mar 2014 #29
I CARE what seveneyes thinks. That's who. pangaia Mar 2014 #34
That is ridiculously reckless. Laelth Mar 2014 #28
Let's hope it is all bluster. Rex Mar 2014 #31
Of course not. n/t GP6971 Mar 2014 #35
I think Putin is counting GP6971 Mar 2014 #36
Any other older DUers having flashbacks right about now? Brigid Mar 2014 #38
I think the actual quote was ozone_man Mar 2014 #39
Sounds like a case of possession with intent to deliver jsr Mar 2014 #43
Someone doesn't like the fact we spoke up. hrmjustin Mar 2014 #40
who would have thought that when he just wanted arely staircase Mar 2014 #41
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Putin’s media head threat...»Reply #33