General Discussion

rppper

(2,952 posts)

56. I'm throwing the horsesh@t flag on this...

Sun Mar 16, 2014, 08:10 PM

Mar 2014

Two of the four submarines I served on were dedicated spec-ops boats...including the test bed boat for submarine/special forces ops after 1990...I'm the guy who let them in and out of the escape chambers...they would tell you some gruesome war stories, but it was all strictly line if duty stuff, not pumping 500+ additional rounds into a dead body on site. I seriously doubt they fired inside a helo or onboard an aircraft carrier with 6000 crew-members...none of the spec-ops teams, from any of the services, I ever assisted onboard showed anything but the utmost professionalism and seriousness towards their missions. The entire team probably carried just over 500 rounds between them. They're not heavily armored.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

58 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Navy SEALs 'took turns dumping HUNDREDS of bullets' into Osama bin Laden's dead body, a new report [View all] Tony_FLADEM Mar 2014 OP

Uh, huh ... 1000words Mar 2014 #1

Bullets cost money... yuiyoshida Mar 2014 #2

Um, OK thank you bluestateguy Mar 2014 #3

Immature and unprofessional. nt Mojorabbit Mar 2014 #4

I don't believe a word of that rudolph the red Mar 2014 #5

You got all of that out with a straight face, too. That was very disciplined. dogknob Mar 2014 #24

You're right, rudolph the red Mar 2014 #25

That is a very interesting response. dogknob Mar 2014 #30

Your comment implied that i was lying, then you posted a YouTube clip. rudolph the red Mar 2014 #31

That's just silly. I live in San Clemente, CA near Camp Pendleton... dogknob Mar 2014 #33

Yeah? I'm south of you about 30 miles, rudolph the red Mar 2014 #34

No point-- just snark. Desert805 Mar 2014 #57

Not believable and here's why: MidwestTransplant Mar 2014 #6

Good point. eom BlueMTexpat Mar 2014 #8

Exactly! the timeline was very strict, and "hundreds of rounds" would also make noise, plus the ID anneboleyn Mar 2014 #55

I don't believe it. demosincebirth Mar 2014 #7

"Is he dead yet?" "Nope, let's kill him some more." MrScorpio Mar 2014 #9

I always hate when the title doesn't match the article. Behind the Aegis Mar 2014 #10

I doubt it. PlanetaryOrbit Mar 2014 #11

+100 bullets Separation Mar 2014 #12

hahaha... yuiyoshida Mar 2014 #43

Yeah, well the source of this "report" is one Jack Murphy... bluesbassman Mar 2014 #13

I heard that it was 500 guys who each fired one bullet into the corpse Orrex Mar 2014 #14

And then they lined up again to stab him with knives jsr Mar 2014 #18

I call BS on this story. SCUBANOW Mar 2014 #15

Now if they were talking about sorefeet Mar 2014 #16

Even if they did, Mugu Mar 2014 #17

Childish. jwirr Mar 2014 #19

Unsourced claptrap. MineralMan Mar 2014 #20

Why did the Daily Mail publish it? Why does FoxNews cheer for Republicans? Bluenorthwest Mar 2014 #36

I call bullshit. uncommonlink Mar 2014 #21

I don't think I believe this madokie Mar 2014 #22

yeah, because it isn't like they were in a hurry to get out of pakistan or anything nt arely staircase Mar 2014 #23

what a bunch of BS. dailymail is another tabloid media similar to fox. Sunlei Mar 2014 #26

more likely bin laden knew his time was up and shot himself 500 times. unblock Mar 2014 #27

Doesn't pass the sniff test... Lost_Count Mar 2014 #28

I don't think dailymail crap 'articles' should be allowed on DU or give tabloid media their own list Sunlei Mar 2014 #29

Note - a tabloid speaking of unnamed "sources" on an unnamed website -speaking of a "report" karynnj Mar 2014 #32

Nothing like spreading some more propaganda to irritate the Auntie Bush Mar 2014 #35

That was my first thought. Ilsa Mar 2014 #37

Yeah ... consider the source, the DAILY MAIL... bobduca Mar 2014 #45

The Daily Mail has no quality control. CJCRANE Mar 2014 #38

I doubt it, there would be mush and no solid body. Rex Mar 2014 #39

I don't know about this. Mojo Electro Mar 2014 #40

I don't support the military unless they are professional and ethical LiberalFighter Mar 2014 #41

I'm pretty sure that after 100 bullets Rocknrule Mar 2014 #42

Right? WilliamPitt Mar 2014 #50

That would take probably 5 seconds to do, but this is the Daily Mail, so it probably never happened chrisa Mar 2014 #44

I would have pissed on his corpse. Throd Mar 2014 #46

Why is it that I do not buy this one? nadinbrzezinski Mar 2014 #47

No, but they shot each of the children 100 times. undeterred Mar 2014 #48

In the middle of a hostile area with a crashed chopper after a firefight? WilliamPitt Mar 2014 #49

thats disgusting...wasting that many bullets Demonaut Mar 2014 #51

It never happened because it would have left messy evidence behind that Baitball Blogger Mar 2014 #52

Boys will be boys. Did they pee on him also? Tierra_y_Libertad Mar 2014 #53

Probably not true CFLDem Mar 2014 #54

I'm throwing the horsesh@t flag on this... rppper Mar 2014 #56

Conspiracy BS, IMO. Raine1967 Mar 2014 #58