I just cracked the DU lack of analysis code

[cui bono]

73. You have no idea what my argument is so you don't even know what that is evidence of, it's not about

Pelosi though, I can tell you that. I never brought her name up. You did.

Go reread the thread. Or read it to begin with. That's a good place to start.

I laid it all out for you over there. All you have to do is read. Much of it is from your own link, you know, the parts you wanted to disregard.

Go ahead. You'll see. Just as I said.

As to your being dumbfounded... surely you can see that there is a difference between what people push for and what a law ends up being. And surely you can see that I never said that Pelosi pushed for anything, which is the point I was making in this thread. I was making that point because you keep trying to change what I said in the other thread. You are on a mision and by golly you won't stop no matter how much you have to try to twist everything I said into whatever you wanted it to be. You really need to take a logic class and get some help for all the projecting and disingenuous arguing you do.

You're the one who has mangled this whole thing trying to make it look like I have not proven anything when I absolutely did prove it already, a long, long time ago by now. Seriously, all you have to do is go read my posts. I know you know how to find them.