General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: This message was self-deleted by its author [View all]TrollBuster9090
(6,113 posts)to be effective. (That's even true in countries with a single payer health care system.) And, if you're talking about a drug that IS proven to be effective, but there are several brand name formulations vs. alternative (generic) equivalents that are proven to be as effective (or in the same ballpark) an insurance provider is free to say you have to use the cheaper one. A problem sometimes arises when somebody is used to a brand name that is five times more expensive than the generic version; or has been using a more expensive formulation that hasn't been proven to be more effective than an alternative, cheaper formulation with the same active ingredients.
That happens all the time; but it's not really a denial of a life-saving medication. It's just a denial of a more expensive version of something that isn't proven to be more effective that some other treatment.
I don't know if that's the case here, though. I'm just saying there's a lot of noise about this kind of thing that goes on whenever people are required to switch plans or providers. And it happened long before the ACA.