General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: So let me see if I've got this straight... [View all]DanTex
(20,709 posts)Yours might be the first. In which case you probably want to contact the Koch Brothers, because with all their millions, and all their searching, every time they find someone to put on TV to complain about Obamacare, turns out that person is either fictional, or else is not actually taking advantage of the available options. Some, for ideological reasons, others because they just didn't know. But those people, the ones hand-picked by the Koch Brothers to attack Obamacare, so far every one of them is actually better off post-ACA than pre-ACA.
Still, let's assume that you actually don't have any other options. In which case, your situation sucks, no doubt about it. The question is whether Obama is at fault. ACA is providing coverage to millions of people who otherwise wouldn't have it, and in almost all cases, the coverage is better than before. This is because the regulations now are stricter than they were pre-ACA. If you compare ACA to some utopian world with no Republicans, then sure, ACA falls short. But those aren't the options available to us.
You can argue, and I would agree with you, that there should be stronger regulations, that insurance companies should be required to cover more than they do, that there should be a public option, etc. I imagine Obama agrees with you also. But there is that problem of the GOP-controlled congress.
Do you thing you would be better off in the pre-ACA world?