Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
34. As a civil servant you live under different standards
Wed Mar 19, 2014, 01:57 PM
Mar 2014

And in an ideal world you might have a point. I am talking of real cases here. You think our officer in question would have faced the judge if the first complainant was sued by the officer 14 years ago? Remember she was wrong and without merit until oops, she was right? Also remember statue for criminal complaint has expired.

Departments like to cover for officers. Why? To be kind, they hate to admit there is any form of cronyism (that be officer two) or that the psychological and background check failed to weed bad apples. (That be all three officers) Of that perhaps internal culture is at issue here as well. (There are allegations against a supervisor teaching field trainees bad behavior. Super has since retired by the way)

For a well known case that was massive see LAPD Rampart Division scandal, that also emerged from baseless public complaints until...oops the FBI and DOJ got involved. The department is still under Federal Supervision.

This law has bad idea and potential for abuse written all over it.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Brute Squad legalized... when it is passed diabeticman Mar 2014 #1
Amerika n/t dotymed Mar 2014 #2
Playing devils advocate JJChambers Mar 2014 #3
Perjury is already illegal knightmaar Mar 2014 #11
Thank you for telling the truth! -nt Anansi1171 Mar 2014 #28
Did you read the bill? It is not about WCLinolVir Mar 2014 #12
Why shouldn't a cop be able to sue someone for filing a false complaint? JJChambers Mar 2014 #18
Locally we have had a bumper crop nadinbrzezinski Mar 2014 #21
Do you think there should be consequences for filing a false complaint? JJChambers Mar 2014 #25
No, because of cases like this. nadinbrzezinski Mar 2014 #26
I disagree JJChambers Mar 2014 #27
Not many here seem to give the Police the benefit of Anansi1171 Mar 2014 #30
Because we all know civilians always lie nadinbrzezinski Mar 2014 #31
I agree with cameras too JJChambers Mar 2014 #32
As a civil servant you live under different standards nadinbrzezinski Mar 2014 #34
The bill is attempting to conflate "false" complaint with "unable to get a conviction" complaint. okaawhatever Mar 2014 #29
In your dreams. IrishAyes Mar 2014 #17
Really? So you are in favor if someone testifys in a trial that a person committed a crime and... Logical Mar 2014 #23
Quick Question Savannahmann Mar 2014 #33
Dear god...this has 'bad idea' written all over it. davidn3600 Mar 2014 #4
kansas needs to be federalized leftyohiolib Mar 2014 #5
I live here and it has become a GOP hell hole. nt Logical Mar 2014 #6
Become? tridim Mar 2014 #8
We had a woman democratic governor not that long ago. It has changed. n-t Logical Mar 2014 #22
The worst part is other right leaning states will follow! nt Logical Mar 2014 #7
Yeah, this looks like an ALEC test case...nt Wounded Bear Mar 2014 #15
Minnesota had a similar law. Eric J in MN Mar 2014 #9
And there you have it! RC Mar 2014 #13
Isn't it already against the law? Grins Mar 2014 #10
I refuse to even drive through Kansas. A scary place. mountain grammy Mar 2014 #14
Sickening. Pardon me, I need to go throw up. IrishAyes Mar 2014 #16
This is stepping stone to TRoN33 Mar 2014 #19
there really is a special kind of stupid in Kansas snooper2 Mar 2014 #20
The prison-industrial complex FlyByNight Mar 2014 #24
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Kansas Bill Seeks to Lega...»Reply #34