General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: So let me see if I've got this straight... [View all]ChiciB1
(15,435 posts)issued by the Feds. Simply put, because a person passes a certain age, they are being denied the medication. BUT, a person 20 years younger "might" have more of a problem than me. I did say the medications I'm talking about aren't new medications. I've been taking them for a long time WITHOUT any adverse reactions. I responded to a ProSense post, and don't think I've agreed with her on anything ever, but I DON'T think this is an ACA problem. It's the Medicare Formulary that has changed.
A cookie-cutter, one size fits all approach to what they feel a person should or shouldn't take. What I had stated to her was that without taking the medication I've been taking, that NOT taking it could cause MORE of a medical problem and actually cost more in the long run. And, possibly put my health at risk in a negative way.
Just not fair. I'm not alone, I'm hearing this more & more. I understand that elderly people get loaded down with meds they don't need and don't understand and it is dangerous. However, if a person sees a doctor on a regular basis - like monthly - and fills out the forms advising them to approve the medication and they still deny, I'm one who has to deal with the consequences. I have a chronic condition & we've tried other types of treatments (many) and the only other option would be surgery. Surgery isn't always an answer and it could make it worse.
Anyway, you get the picture. Thanks for the info anyway, I do appreciate it.