General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: So let me see if I've got this straight... [View all]Coyote_Bandit
(6,783 posts)When Obama first campaigned for President he supported single payer - even though he and his minions couldn't manage to fight for a strong public option when it came time to do so. The old bait and switch.
And ACA is federal law funded almost exclusively by federal taxes yet it can have widely different financial impact on a particular citizen based solely on his state of residence. We want to blame the states and he courts for that. Thing is if the law had been structured to actually create a public option then there would be no reason for state involvement though the use of Medicaid programs. Serious lack of foresight and planning and a major fail for millions of people.
Not that ACA is a complete failure. But we could have done better. We should have done better. But the President was more willing to make a deal than fight for a strong public option.
Color me unimpressed for reasons that include issues of trustworthiness and credibility as well as competence in planning and implementing ACA. This signature piece of legislation is nothing more than further evidence that our current incarnation of government of the people, for the people and by the people is a failure. Small wonder so many aspire to apathy.