Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Kos Folds Up the Big Tent [View all]WhaTHellsgoingonhere
(5,252 posts)48. Let's play with real numbers, not yours
This is part of Moulitsases reply to the attack:
Who cares if seven of the 10 were replaced with Republicans? Ten years ago, Democrats had 49 members in the Senate. Today they have 53 plus Bernie Sanders and Angus King. And even if they lose the Senate this year, which they won't, it won't be much more than a rental as 2016 is a stellar map for us (up to 10 potential pickups).
So is it better to have Ben Nelson, Joe Lieberman and Zell Miller in a 49-seat minority, or is it better to replace them with better Democrats in a 55-seat Democratic majority? Only morons would argue for the former, but apparently, that's what Third Way wants to be.
I understand your predicament and sympathize. I've only lived in the deepest blue cities in the country (SF and Chicago), so my shit don't stink
Green, Moulitsas et. al. have a very important place in our conversation. I don't always agree with them but I'm glad they say what they do. People have completely forgotten what liberal principles are. They confuse voting Democratic with being liberal. Capisce?
In any event, I wish you all the best, my friend. Keep fighting the good fight.
Marc
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
71 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
So you are willing to promote anti gay views for a fee and that's supposed to be
Bluenorthwest
Mar 2014
#66
And this is why there is no ENTHUSIASM - the deck is stacked so that even if the Dems
djean111
Mar 2014
#55
he is in a Blue district, just like DArrell Issa gets elected in solid blue California
JI7
Mar 2014
#19
Easy, his district is D+31, has had 1 Republican rep since the Civil War, and is majority African
okaawhatever
Mar 2014
#51
Wow, that's quite a flip flop for Kos, former Republican who was KNOWN for hating liberals,
sabrina 1
Mar 2014
#11
well, yeah, when dems lose, they are succeed by the republicans who dealt that loss.
mopinko
Mar 2014
#18
The notion that a liberal/progressive can win in a Rethug leaning district is simply ignorant...
DCBob
Mar 2014
#34
No need to read what Moulsitsas actually said in his blog post when you can
Chathamization
Mar 2014
#58
"Who cares is seven of the ten were replaced by Republicans" damns him out of his own mouth.
Donald Ian Rankin
Mar 2014
#59
The depressing fact is that in AR and the rest of the states where the Blue Dogs are in danger,
Beacool
Mar 2014
#64
It's easy for you to say 'Big Tent' but what you are asking of others is to support bigots
Bluenorthwest
Mar 2014
#67