Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

madfloridian

(88,117 posts)
23. This part about how Clinton tried to avoid DLC rhetoric, but their NAFTA plan got done.
Fri Mar 21, 2014, 10:54 PM
Mar 2014

Even back when Clinton was president they knew these were not views supported by the people. Interesting paragraphs from the Nichols article:

Clinton learned early on the dangers of following the DLC line too closely. After the 1992 election, giddy New Democrats inside and outside the Administration did much to define the first two years of the Clinton Presidency. The result was the worst Democratic electoral setback of the century--a sweeping rejection of the party caused, in no small measure, by the failure of millions of working class voters to go to the polls. They were angered by Clinton's over-the-top backing of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), a DLC signature issue.

After the 1994 election, DLC cadres set about shaping political structures that would give it greater influence within the Congressional Democratic caucus. They formed the New Democrat Network, a well-funded group dedicated to electing and reelecting corporation-friendly Democrats. It expanded the House membership after both the 1996 and 1998 elections.

....The DLC got so excited about putting expansion of NAFTA on fast track in 1997 that it hired lobbyists and aired its first-ever television ad campaign, a $200,000 initiative that urged viewers to tell Congress to hand over trade negotiating authority to the President. Congress said "no" then, but the position resurfaces as a plank in this year's platform.

.....Now, the DLC and its allied groups, particularly the New Democrat Network, have stepped up efforts to assure that future trade votes will favor Wall Street over Main Street.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Recommend jsr Mar 2014 #1
What Wellstone said. madfloridian Mar 2014 #2
My roots are in Minnesota malokvale77 Mar 2014 #9
His death hit us hard here. madfloridian Mar 2014 #16
k&r nt Mnemosyne Mar 2014 #3
Why are we even here anymore? Generic Other Mar 2014 #4
I'm here because... bvar22 Feb 2015 #48
I feel sick to my stomach... senseandsensibility Mar 2014 #5
There was a definitive beginning point, but I don't think there is yet an ending. madfloridian Mar 2014 #6
Trouble in paradise. fleabiscuit Mar 2014 #12
Huge K&R The DLC/Third Way is an infiltrating cancer. woo me with science Mar 2014 #7
They sure as hell have infiltrated this board. Le Taz Hot Mar 2014 #22
Along with a database full of message points. nt adirondacker Mar 2014 #26
"... like it was their job or something." Scuba Mar 2014 #30
Ever notice when a thread cut too close hootinholler Mar 2014 #31
"Same companies behind the GOP are behind the DLC " fascisthunter Mar 2014 #44
You can find the Von Drehle article here, but it's paywalled: JHB Mar 2014 #8
I wonder if there is more to it? I swear I would almost be willing to pay to find it. madfloridian Mar 2014 #17
The site seems to be handling WaPo's archive, thus the need to pay to get access. JHB Mar 2014 #18
It's almost 30 a month. about 200 a year. madfloridian Mar 2014 #25
You seem to have most of it. Here's what I was able to find Catherina Mar 2014 #27
K&R FloriTexan Mar 2014 #10
K&R, eom fleabiscuit Mar 2014 #11
top verses bottom geretogo Mar 2014 #13
K&R zeemike Mar 2014 #14
K&R. JDPriestly Mar 2014 #15
Great song. madfloridian Mar 2014 #20
They sure don't. We need to change that. JDPriestly Mar 2014 #28
One of the best posts of the week. MerryBlooms Mar 2014 #19
.... madfloridian Mar 2014 #21
This part about how Clinton tried to avoid DLC rhetoric, but their NAFTA plan got done. madfloridian Mar 2014 #23
Thank you. Excellent OP! (nt) scarletwoman Mar 2014 #24
"Heavily financed..." chervilant Mar 2014 #29
They are ruthless. madfloridian Mar 2014 #32
I lost interest after "ideologically rigid sectarian clique" brooklynite Mar 2014 #33
Consider watching chervilant Mar 2014 #34
An equally silly argument... brooklynite Mar 2014 #35
From the mouth of an original DLC leader, and founder of the New Dem network. madfloridian Mar 2014 #37
OIC... chervilant Mar 2014 #40
from your post: "We (the macro-level WE) are easily "persuaded."" brooklynite Mar 2014 #42
Ooooh, I'm so impressed! chervilant Mar 2014 #45
If you're in the REAL world of politics, you sure have a big job ahead. madfloridian Mar 2014 #47
I think you need some levity in your life... chervilant Mar 2014 #46
They were terrified of the Dean Meetups..The People getting together and sharing KoKo Mar 2014 #36
FL Dems esp did not care for us. They called DLC the "wind" in their sails. Quote. madfloridian Mar 2014 #38
amazing.... KoKo Mar 2014 #39
K&R LondonReign2 Mar 2014 #41
The Corporate Wing of the Democratic Party fascisthunter Mar 2014 #43
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»"Heavily financed by...»Reply #23