Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: You are either a Freeper or a Purity-Test Democrat [View all]TexasTowelie
(127,419 posts)48. You're welcome.
Most of us have found DU to get quick news information so it is invaluable in that respect.
I admit to posting some "freeper" type of threads on occasion if for no other purpose than to mock and ridicule them. I've kind of taken on the role as a reporter in the Texas Group since I've been unemployed and was providing home health care for my father before he passed away. Reporting that news is a task made a lot easier because of all of the right-wing nuts in Texas.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
102 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Hillary did. That is my reason for never supporting her. My conscience wouldn't allow it. There are
sabrina 1
Mar 2014
#90
This garbage again, implying that putting SS cuts on the table has done no harm?
woo me with science
Mar 2014
#69
Or temporarily removing them during election season because they are so UNPOPULAR with voters
sabrina 1
Mar 2014
#82
This site was started to fight Republicans. Why did Obama appoint so many Republicans to his cabinet
sabrina 1
Mar 2014
#26
I have not read it. But I know what it is about. Lincoln appointed some of his rivals to his
sabrina 1
Mar 2014
#50
No, it is not within the power of the President to add more justices to the SC. Congress,
kelly1mm
Mar 2014
#49
It's the *definition* of guilt by association. What's your smear here, Josh?
woo me with science
Mar 2014
#65
You cannot be discredited here by ANYONE calling themselves a Democrat so I wouldn't worry about it,
sabrina 1
Mar 2014
#80
Do Purity-Test Democrats have to attend some kind of a Ball? If so, do they have a choice who
adirondacker
Mar 2014
#30
the third way wants unicorns and ponies, all manufactured in low wage Asian sweatshops
pragmatic_dem
Mar 2014
#86