What troubles me most about a Hillary Clinton Presidency, is foreign policy

[Trust Buster]

12. Perhaps you should read more carefully.....

Cali began the thread with this statement:

I don't want to get into why she so often sounds neo-con hawkish; it's enough that she does. Her corporate bent is disturbing and it's not unrelated to her hawkishness.

Now to the matter of her foreign policy. You can't convince me that Hillary would have done Iraq. She's not that stupid. Every candidate goes before Jewish-American groups like AIPAC and talks a tough game. Google Senator Obama's 2008 AIPAC appearance and you will see a similar posture. That's how the game is played.

Hillary was historically correct with regards to Hitler's justifications for invading Czechoslovakia and Poland. Like Putin, Hitler's original justification was the safety of German born citizens living in those countries. It's only the misuse of "Hitler" and "Nazi" example by others that has made such an analogy a "hot button" issue.

No one can know what any Presidential candidate would do when confronted with an international crisis. It's folly to think you do. What we do know is that the Republicans will try to frame a female candidate as being weak on defense issues and they'll wrap Benghazi in for good measure. She must position herself to combat these charges. Like Senator Obama, she must appeal to the Jewish-American community for obvious reasons. And like Senator Obama, you should take that with a grain of salt.