Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: You are either a Freeper or a Purity-Test Democrat [View all]woo me with science
(32,139 posts)69. This garbage again, implying that putting SS cuts on the table has done no harm?
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=edit&forum=1002&thread=4535742&pid=4535966
The threat of cuts has been used both to impose real, vicious austerity in other areas *and* to entrench the lying Republican narrative tying Social Security to the deficit and implying that deficit cutting is the most important goal for the country. And the cuts are *still* on the table for when they are finished using them this way.
Every Democrat, every American, should be sick of the constant Third Way implication that these Social Security threats have been just words and didn't harm anyone. They have harmed EVERYONE.
The threat of cuts has been used both to impose real, vicious austerity in other areas *and* to entrench the lying Republican narrative tying Social Security to the deficit and implying that deficit cutting is the most important goal for the country. And the cuts are *still* on the table for when they are finished using them this way.
Every Democrat, every American, should be sick of the constant Third Way implication that these Social Security threats have been just words and didn't harm anyone. They have harmed EVERYONE.
1. Without the threatened axe of Social Security cuts (which kept returning as the austerity kept escalating), the Third Way would never have been able to sell the vicious budget and social program cuts they HAVE inflicted on Americans...by justifying them as the lesser of two evils.
If you had told us a few years ago that the Barack Obama administration would be presiding over government spending that assaults the poor even more viciously than the RYAN plan, we would never have believed it. Yet that is exactly where we found ourselves, surrounded by corporate mouthpieces exhorting us to be grateful, "because he didn't cut Social Security."2. For years, Republicans have drummed lies into the heads of the American people about the source of our economic problems and how to fix them. They have pushed vicious austerity and malignant, economy-starving deficit-cutting instead of the real help to the 99 percent that is needed, and they have preached lies about the need to cut SS and LIES about its contribution to the deficit.
President Obama had from Day One of this Presidency to change the narrative about deficits and Social Security. Instead, he has yet again cemented the Republican narrative and made it a "bipartisan" narrative in a way that will not be undone anytime soon.
And this TEMPORARY suspension of the threats, of course during an election year, and of course simultaneously repeating Republican lies about how the deficit will cause them to return in the future....is the obscene, disgraceful Third Way cherry on top.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
102 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Hillary did. That is my reason for never supporting her. My conscience wouldn't allow it. There are
sabrina 1
Mar 2014
#90
This garbage again, implying that putting SS cuts on the table has done no harm?
woo me with science
Mar 2014
#69
Or temporarily removing them during election season because they are so UNPOPULAR with voters
sabrina 1
Mar 2014
#82
This site was started to fight Republicans. Why did Obama appoint so many Republicans to his cabinet
sabrina 1
Mar 2014
#26
I have not read it. But I know what it is about. Lincoln appointed some of his rivals to his
sabrina 1
Mar 2014
#50
No, it is not within the power of the President to add more justices to the SC. Congress,
kelly1mm
Mar 2014
#49
It's the *definition* of guilt by association. What's your smear here, Josh?
woo me with science
Mar 2014
#65
You cannot be discredited here by ANYONE calling themselves a Democrat so I wouldn't worry about it,
sabrina 1
Mar 2014
#80
Do Purity-Test Democrats have to attend some kind of a Ball? If so, do they have a choice who
adirondacker
Mar 2014
#30
the third way wants unicorns and ponies, all manufactured in low wage Asian sweatshops
pragmatic_dem
Mar 2014
#86