Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Nate Silver: GOP favored to win Senate [View all]ProSense
(116,464 posts)3. That's a really
There are 10 races that each party has at least a 25 percent chance of winning, according to our ratings. If Republicans were to win all of them, they would gain a net of 11 seats from Democrats, which would give them a 56-44 majority in the new Senate. If Democrats were to sweep, they would lose a net of just one seat and hold a 54-46 majority.
So our forecast might be thought of as a Republican gain of six seats plus or minus five. The balance has shifted slightly toward the GOP. But it wouldnt take much for it to revert to the Democrats, nor for this year to develop into a Republican rout along the lines of 2010.
So our forecast might be thought of as a Republican gain of six seats plus or minus five. The balance has shifted slightly toward the GOP. But it wouldnt take much for it to revert to the Democrats, nor for this year to develop into a Republican rout along the lines of 2010.
...broad forecast.
Still, this is interesting:
Overall forecast
In consideration of these factors, we assess the probability of the Democratic or Republican candidate winning each seat. Where the choice of candidates is uncertain for instance, in a race where a Democrat will face either a moderate, six-term incumbent U.S. representative or a poorly-financed tea party upstart, depending on the outcome of the Republican primary the probabilities are meant to reflect a weighted combination of the plausible match-ups. Our assessment of the 36 races2 up for grabs this November is as follows:

In consideration of these factors, we assess the probability of the Democratic or Republican candidate winning each seat. Where the choice of candidates is uncertain for instance, in a race where a Democrat will face either a moderate, six-term incumbent U.S. representative or a poorly-financed tea party upstart, depending on the outcome of the Republican primary the probabilities are meant to reflect a weighted combination of the plausible match-ups. Our assessment of the 36 races2 up for grabs this November is as follows:

Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
157 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Except that it takes two-thirds of the Senate to convict the President on impeachment.
TexasTowelie
Mar 2014
#95
If republicans control the House and Senate, with their current mindset, they
bluestate10
Mar 2014
#43
I'll let the chicken little gang enjoy snatching defeat from the jaws of victory.
L0oniX
Mar 2014
#84
LOL, we love Nate when he says dems will win. We hate him other wise. So stupid. n-t
Logical
Mar 2014
#18
I'm pretty sure there will be plenty here rubbing their hands will glee over that prediction n/t
Sheepshank
Mar 2014
#29
So yea ...don't bother to vote. So we loose and you would be happy that the pollster was right.
L0oniX
Mar 2014
#106
Yea ...I am angry that Dems didn't get out and vote for Alex Sink ...maybe they saw Nate's poll...
L0oniX
Mar 2014
#141
Most teams have cheerleaders. Nate is right? ...ok ...so don't bother to vote. Got it!
L0oniX
Mar 2014
#109
That's a much better way to use the poll. Saying Nate's always right is saying don't bother to vote.
L0oniX
Mar 2014
#116
Silver is a Statistician, he calls it as he sees it. We must prove him wrong. We
bluestate10
Mar 2014
#44
There will be NO 'poorly-financed tea party upstart' with Koch dollars in play. n/t
freshwest
Mar 2014
#66
Does any forecaster predict that Democrats will come close to picking up 17 seats?
Pepper Cat
Mar 2014
#146
Bullshit. Saying the mid-terms aren't important is a giveaway to the republicans.
arcane1
Mar 2014
#30
I hope you're right. But you have to acknowledge that Nate's track record has been fairly
Number23
Mar 2014
#45
No we don't have to accept Nate's shit poll. I am going to vote anyway. Fuck Nate!
L0oniX
Mar 2014
#110
If historical true, the final count at the voting booth with have nothing to do policy,
Sheepshank
Mar 2014
#33
Republicans are going to make it as hard as possible to vote, so don't count on
bluestate10
Mar 2014
#65
Any attempt to suppress should be immediately stopped, and then the perpertrator
Timez Squarez
Mar 2014
#73
Silver is the best I've ever seen at prognostication. With what I think will happen prior to
ballyhoo
Mar 2014
#61
It will be hard but we can still hold onto it but we need to get our base out.
hrmjustin
Mar 2014
#75
How anyone can vote for a Republican after the stench of the Bewsh years is beyond me completely.
HughBeaumont
Mar 2014
#128
*******************"Slight Favorite in Race for Senate"**********************
uponit7771
Mar 2014
#129
Polls combined with some basic common sense this far out are very predictive
Hippo_Tron
Mar 2014
#152