Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: "Clinton wants 'mass movement' on climate change" [View all]"A speech, another speech and a website"
...I knew if I posted actions, someone would be along to dismiss them.
NRDC: President Obama Driving America to Cleaner Energy Future
WASHINGTON (February 18, 2014) President Obamas newly announced fuel-efficiency standards for heavy trucks will help such vehicles go farther on less fuel while further curbing carbon pollution from Americas transportation sector, the largest source of carbon pollution after power plants.
The following is a statement from Frances Beinecke, president of the Natural Resources Defense Council, who is scheduled to be a White House guest at this mornings event in Upper Marlboro, Md.:
The presidents initiative is an important step driving America toward a cleaner energy future. Strong heavy truck efficiency standards will not only cut carbon pollution that fuels climate change, but also save consumers money every time they go to a store and save truckers money at the pump. Just as clean car standards are revitalizing the American auto industry, which added more than 370,000 jobs, setting the bar higher for trucks will further encourage innovation in the industry. This is a win-win for the environment and the economy.
http://www.nrdc.org/media/2014/140218.asp
WASHINGTON (February 18, 2014) President Obamas newly announced fuel-efficiency standards for heavy trucks will help such vehicles go farther on less fuel while further curbing carbon pollution from Americas transportation sector, the largest source of carbon pollution after power plants.
The following is a statement from Frances Beinecke, president of the Natural Resources Defense Council, who is scheduled to be a White House guest at this mornings event in Upper Marlboro, Md.:
The presidents initiative is an important step driving America toward a cleaner energy future. Strong heavy truck efficiency standards will not only cut carbon pollution that fuels climate change, but also save consumers money every time they go to a store and save truckers money at the pump. Just as clean car standards are revitalizing the American auto industry, which added more than 370,000 jobs, setting the bar higher for trucks will further encourage innovation in the industry. This is a win-win for the environment and the economy.
http://www.nrdc.org/media/2014/140218.asp
Why Obamas New Fuel Standards For Big Trucks Matter
http://thinkprogress.org/climate/2014/02/18/3300031/obama-fuel-standards-trucks/
EPA Makes the Right Move for Bristol Bay, Starts 404(c) Process on Pebble Mine
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10024584590
Polluting Appalachias Streams With Mountaintop Removal Mining Just Got Harder
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10024548910
Thank President Obama for protecting Point Arena-Stornetta Public Lands!
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10024650005
<...>
But the Union of Concerned Scientists is on board with Obamas priorities. The president is confronting members of Congress with a reality they need to face: climate change is already hurting us economically, said Angela Anderson, the director of the groups Climate and Energy Program. Resilience funding is essential to confront the consequences of climate change already being felt. Beyond that, Congress needs to get serious about reducing the risks of the changing climate. Unless and until we start cutting emissions that cause global warming, the problems communities are facing, and their price tags, will continue to grow.
- more -
http://thinkprogress.org/climate/2014/03/05/3366331/obama-2015-budget-climate/
But the Union of Concerned Scientists is on board with Obamas priorities. The president is confronting members of Congress with a reality they need to face: climate change is already hurting us economically, said Angela Anderson, the director of the groups Climate and Energy Program. Resilience funding is essential to confront the consequences of climate change already being felt. Beyond that, Congress needs to get serious about reducing the risks of the changing climate. Unless and until we start cutting emissions that cause global warming, the problems communities are facing, and their price tags, will continue to grow.
- more -
http://thinkprogress.org/climate/2014/03/05/3366331/obama-2015-budget-climate/
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
63 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Not a fan? I like her taking bold steps on issues. It is what will cream the GOP.
applegrove
Mar 2014
#2
If you do not want to vote for her at least vote for Congress. We needs a full deck.
jwirr
Mar 2014
#10
I WANT to believe this but Clinton does not inspire me with confidence on anything.
randome
Mar 2014
#8
The biggest change we could make today to address the creation of greenhouse gasses
Jesus Malverde
Mar 2014
#9
Tiny? Not according to UN_CarbonMechs vetted "ClimaLoop Infographic: CO2 emissions by country."
proverbialwisdom
Mar 2014
#47
Just a bunch of jargon to me but the source is the official verified Twitter acct 'UN_CarbonMechs'
proverbialwisdom
Mar 2014
#58
Okay she put a title on her paper. Now fill in the essay. What are you going to do about climate
jwirr
Mar 2014
#11
And of course, we all remember how 350.org's mass actions stopped Keystone XL . . .
hatrack
Mar 2014
#17
and you are already railing against her and she's not even the nominee yet...
VanillaRhapsody
Mar 2014
#31
I just wanted to chime in and thank you for calling her Clinton instead of Hillary.
Iggo
Mar 2014
#36
She's floating her talking points and issues to see what sticks and what doesn't
lunatica
Mar 2014
#40
Whoooh.. I just read this as "Clinton wants (to take a giant dump) on climate change."
PowerToThePeople
Mar 2014
#46
Glad to see her speaking out against fracking and the XL Pipeline...oh, wait.
Tierra_y_Libertad
Mar 2014
#55