Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: White House withholds thousands of documents from Senate CIA probe, despite vows of help [View all]2banon
(7,321 posts)52. "The Panetta Review" was apparently the red flag
On the other hand, that may just be a false flag decoy for some other undisclosed report/analysis even more onerous and damaging than the Panetta Review.
Given Panetta's close alliances and kindred spirits with the Neo-Cons world view on "American Exceptionalism", it's hard for me to buy into the notion that his piece is actually the core issue of concern.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
77 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
White House withholds thousands of documents from Senate CIA probe, despite vows of help [View all]
Octafish
Mar 2014
OP
Since they can't release the report til the WH turns over the documents
riderinthestorm
Mar 2014
#10
Cool, now where is he on making the documents available to them to effectively make the report?
TheKentuckian
Mar 2014
#21
Best to depart in quiet than to keep rattling on until some wonder if such is a pattern.
TheKentuckian
Mar 2014
#75
That's because those tactics are not a form of a legitimate democracy..you're correct imo. n/t
Jefferson23
Mar 2014
#19
No, the obvious intent is a report that has enough data withheld to paint a false impression of
TheKentuckian
Mar 2014
#24
I agree with your assessment of the Bush administration, but the unchecked
LuvNewcastle
Mar 2014
#23
I dont disagree. I was just making the case that they had cart blanche from 2000 - 2008. nm
rhett o rick
Mar 2014
#25
I think he is on a short leash. He knows a lot, maybe too much. Just sayin. nm
rhett o rick
Mar 2014
#29
hmm, interesting point. It's hard not see his hand on the levers on the game board though. n/t
2banon
Mar 2014
#55
Not impossible but hard because to press the issue one must be willing to accept
TheKentuckian
Mar 2014
#30
You know considering the NeoCons chest thumping, and belittling President Obama's anti-aggressive
2banon
Mar 2014
#58
Absolutely, an interview with Cheney should be exactly like an interview with Manson.
TheKentuckian
Mar 2014
#68
If they have nothing to hide about torture then they have nothing to worry about.
Tierra_y_Libertad
Mar 2014
#33
The Senate should hire Snowden so they could find out what the CIA does.
Tierra_y_Libertad
Mar 2014
#56
It's IS sad that the so called South American "banana republics" have done a better job ...
MrMickeysMom
Mar 2014
#73
"more than one quarter of all footnotes in the 9/11 Report refer to CIA interrogations"
johnnyreb
Mar 2014
#67