Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: White House withholds thousands of documents from Senate CIA probe, despite vows of help [View all]ProSense
(116,464 posts)53. Here is Udall's statement
the day after that article:
Udall Calls For New Leadership in CIA General Counsel's Office, Declassification of Landmark Intelligence Committee Torture Study
Votes for New Leadership at CIA, Calls for Recusal of Acting-General Counsel Citing Lack of Trust, Clear Conflict of Interest
Mark Udall, a strong advocate for holding the CIA accountable for its misguided detention and interrogation program, called today for new leadership in the agency's general counsel's office. He also called for the CIA's acting-general counsel to recuse himself from further deliberations about that program and issues related to the U.S. Senate Select Committee on Intelligence. Udall said the acting-general counsel's role in the controversial program itself and his efforts to intimidate Senate Intelligence Committee staff underscores his inability to be involved in reviewing the study and related issues.
Udall, a member of the U.S. Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, released his procedural hold today on the nomination of Caroline Krass to be the CIA's general counsel, citing the conflict of interest of the acting-general counsel, as well as a firm and clear commitment by the president to declassify the committee's landmark report on the CIA's detention and interrogation program.
"We need to correct the record on the CIA's coercive detention and interrogation program and declassify the Senate Intelligence Committee's exhaustive study of it. I released my hold on Caroline Krass's nomination today and voted for her to help change the direction of the agency," Udall said. "The president has stated an unequivocal commitment to supporting the declassification of the Senate Intelligence Committee's report. Coloradans expect me to hold him to his word."
Udall has been the leading voice in Congress for the White House and CIA to come clean about the agency's deeply flawed detention and interrogation program. Last week, he pressed the White House to publically commit to declassifying the Senate Intelligence Committee's landmark study on the CIA's misguided program.
During a confirmation hearing for the CIA's general counsel in December, Udall pressed nominee Caroline Krass on discrepancies between a CIA internal review of its detention and interrogation program and the official agency response to the committee's study. He said the contents of the internal review raise "fundamental questions about why a review the CIA conducted internally years ago ... is so different from the CIA's formal written response to the committee study."
http://www.markudall.senate.gov/?p=press_release&id=4103
Votes for New Leadership at CIA, Calls for Recusal of Acting-General Counsel Citing Lack of Trust, Clear Conflict of Interest
Mark Udall, a strong advocate for holding the CIA accountable for its misguided detention and interrogation program, called today for new leadership in the agency's general counsel's office. He also called for the CIA's acting-general counsel to recuse himself from further deliberations about that program and issues related to the U.S. Senate Select Committee on Intelligence. Udall said the acting-general counsel's role in the controversial program itself and his efforts to intimidate Senate Intelligence Committee staff underscores his inability to be involved in reviewing the study and related issues.
Udall, a member of the U.S. Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, released his procedural hold today on the nomination of Caroline Krass to be the CIA's general counsel, citing the conflict of interest of the acting-general counsel, as well as a firm and clear commitment by the president to declassify the committee's landmark report on the CIA's detention and interrogation program.
"We need to correct the record on the CIA's coercive detention and interrogation program and declassify the Senate Intelligence Committee's exhaustive study of it. I released my hold on Caroline Krass's nomination today and voted for her to help change the direction of the agency," Udall said. "The president has stated an unequivocal commitment to supporting the declassification of the Senate Intelligence Committee's report. Coloradans expect me to hold him to his word."
Udall has been the leading voice in Congress for the White House and CIA to come clean about the agency's deeply flawed detention and interrogation program. Last week, he pressed the White House to publically commit to declassifying the Senate Intelligence Committee's landmark study on the CIA's misguided program.
During a confirmation hearing for the CIA's general counsel in December, Udall pressed nominee Caroline Krass on discrepancies between a CIA internal review of its detention and interrogation program and the official agency response to the committee's study. He said the contents of the internal review raise "fundamental questions about why a review the CIA conducted internally years ago ... is so different from the CIA's formal written response to the committee study."
http://www.markudall.senate.gov/?p=press_release&id=4103
Of course, this isn't going to stop people from trying to portray the document mentioned in the OP, which is a matter that WH and Senater are cooperating to resolve, as more important than the missing CIA documents.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
77 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
White House withholds thousands of documents from Senate CIA probe, despite vows of help [View all]
Octafish
Mar 2014
OP
Since they can't release the report til the WH turns over the documents
riderinthestorm
Mar 2014
#10
Cool, now where is he on making the documents available to them to effectively make the report?
TheKentuckian
Mar 2014
#21
Best to depart in quiet than to keep rattling on until some wonder if such is a pattern.
TheKentuckian
Mar 2014
#75
That's because those tactics are not a form of a legitimate democracy..you're correct imo. n/t
Jefferson23
Mar 2014
#19
No, the obvious intent is a report that has enough data withheld to paint a false impression of
TheKentuckian
Mar 2014
#24
I agree with your assessment of the Bush administration, but the unchecked
LuvNewcastle
Mar 2014
#23
I dont disagree. I was just making the case that they had cart blanche from 2000 - 2008. nm
rhett o rick
Mar 2014
#25
I think he is on a short leash. He knows a lot, maybe too much. Just sayin. nm
rhett o rick
Mar 2014
#29
hmm, interesting point. It's hard not see his hand on the levers on the game board though. n/t
2banon
Mar 2014
#55
Not impossible but hard because to press the issue one must be willing to accept
TheKentuckian
Mar 2014
#30
You know considering the NeoCons chest thumping, and belittling President Obama's anti-aggressive
2banon
Mar 2014
#58
Absolutely, an interview with Cheney should be exactly like an interview with Manson.
TheKentuckian
Mar 2014
#68
If they have nothing to hide about torture then they have nothing to worry about.
Tierra_y_Libertad
Mar 2014
#33
The Senate should hire Snowden so they could find out what the CIA does.
Tierra_y_Libertad
Mar 2014
#56
It's IS sad that the so called South American "banana republics" have done a better job ...
MrMickeysMom
Mar 2014
#73
"more than one quarter of all footnotes in the 9/11 Report refer to CIA interrogations"
johnnyreb
Mar 2014
#67