Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
53. Here is Udall's statement
Sun Mar 23, 2014, 01:38 PM
Mar 2014

the day after that article:

Udall Calls For New Leadership in CIA General Counsel's Office, Declassification of Landmark Intelligence Committee Torture Study

Votes for New Leadership at CIA, Calls for Recusal of Acting-General Counsel Citing Lack of Trust, Clear Conflict of Interest

Mark Udall, a strong advocate for holding the CIA accountable for its misguided detention and interrogation program, called today for new leadership in the agency's general counsel's office. He also called for the CIA's acting-general counsel to recuse himself from further deliberations about that program and issues related to the U.S. Senate Select Committee on Intelligence. Udall said the acting-general counsel's role in the controversial program itself and his efforts to intimidate Senate Intelligence Committee staff underscores his inability to be involved in reviewing the study and related issues.

Udall, a member of the U.S. Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, released his procedural hold today on the nomination of Caroline Krass to be the CIA's general counsel, citing the conflict of interest of the acting-general counsel, as well as a firm and clear commitment by the president to declassify the committee's landmark report on the CIA's detention and interrogation program.

"We need to correct the record on the CIA's coercive detention and interrogation program and declassify the Senate Intelligence Committee's exhaustive study of it. I released my hold on Caroline Krass's nomination today and voted for her to help change the direction of the agency," Udall said. "The president has stated an unequivocal commitment to supporting the declassification of the Senate Intelligence Committee's report. Coloradans expect me to hold him to his word."

Udall has been the leading voice in Congress for the White House and CIA to come clean about the agency's deeply flawed detention and interrogation program. Last week, he pressed the White House to publically commit to declassifying the Senate Intelligence Committee's landmark study on the CIA's misguided program.

During a confirmation hearing for the CIA's general counsel in December, Udall pressed nominee Caroline Krass on discrepancies between a CIA internal review of its detention and interrogation program and the official agency response to the committee's study. He said the contents of the internal review raise "fundamental questions about why a review the CIA conducted internally years ago ... is so different from the CIA's formal written response to the committee study."

http://www.markudall.senate.gov/?p=press_release&id=4103

Of course, this isn't going to stop people from trying to portray the document mentioned in the OP, which is a matter that WH and Senater are cooperating to resolve, as more important than the missing CIA documents.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

It would be helpful to know WHO in the WH is involved. dixiegrrrrl Mar 2014 #1
Agree. Democracy requires accountability. Octafish Mar 2014 #6
Cheney Watch.org k&r bobthedrummer Mar 2014 #59
My guess is David Margolis. OnyxCollie Mar 2014 #11
The name Margolis sounds vaguely familiar. 2banon Mar 2014 #16
Here's a link to a paper I wrote about US Attorneys OnyxCollie Mar 2014 #20
"None Dare Call it Treason"... 2banon Mar 2014 #44
I thought we were supposed to transparent? Rosa Luxemburg Mar 2014 #36
Transparent, translucent, opaque, whatever. progressoid Mar 2014 #41
Indeed. woo me with science Mar 2014 #72
I'm gonna say it, this needs to be investigated and not just Autumn Mar 2014 #2
Absolutely. Perhaps a federal Grand Jury led by an Independent Prosecutor? Octafish Mar 2014 #7
This cannot stand. It needs to be done . NOW. Autumn Mar 2014 #8
"The president has stated an unequivocal commitment... ProSense Mar 2014 #3
Definitely. Otherwise, there's a real problem. Octafish Mar 2014 #9
Since they can't release the report til the WH turns over the documents riderinthestorm Mar 2014 #10
Cool, now where is he on making the documents available to them to effectively make the report? TheKentuckian Mar 2014 #21
lol. look how the poster ran, ran away. cali Mar 2014 #74
Best to depart in quiet than to keep rattling on until some wonder if such is a pattern. TheKentuckian Mar 2014 #75
Talk is cheap. nt NorthCarolina Mar 2014 #31
But there is a catch in that. zeemike Mar 2014 #40
Disinformation Ichingcarpenter Mar 2014 #51
Recommend. n/t Jefferson23 Mar 2014 #4
Thanks, Jefferson23! Octafish Mar 2014 #14
That's because those tactics are not a form of a legitimate democracy..you're correct imo. n/t Jefferson23 Mar 2014 #19
Transparency only applies to documents that aren't noteworthy. LuvNewcastle Mar 2014 #5
Catch-22 Octafish Mar 2014 #66
it's a safe bet to say that the American people will NEVER see the report nt G_j Mar 2014 #12
No, the obvious intent is a report that has enough data withheld to paint a false impression of TheKentuckian Mar 2014 #24
good point, and then there were the documents which the CIA destroyed nt G_j Mar 2014 #28
Yup, this is willful. TheKentuckian Mar 2014 #42
rec 840high Mar 2014 #13
This is internal and has nothing to do with national security. L0oniX Mar 2014 #15
Big Kick and Rec! 2banon Mar 2014 #17
If the top levels of our government have a secret government rhett o rick Mar 2014 #18
I agree with your assessment of the Bush administration, but the unchecked LuvNewcastle Mar 2014 #23
I dont disagree. I was just making the case that they had cart blanche from 2000 - 2008. nm rhett o rick Mar 2014 #25
Remember that fire in Cheney's office? 2banon Mar 2014 #27
I think he is on a short leash. He knows a lot, maybe too much. Just sayin. nm rhett o rick Mar 2014 #29
hmm, interesting point. It's hard not see his hand on the levers on the game board though. n/t 2banon Mar 2014 #55
I think his usefulness to the PTB has waned. nm rhett o rick Mar 2014 #62
I forgot about the fire. OnyxCollie Mar 2014 #32
Why is the WH afraid of blowing it open Rosa Luxemburg Mar 2014 #37
Maybe it would reveal Enthusiast Mar 2014 #43
I wish I knew. n/t 2banon Mar 2014 #47
Blowing it open would result in complete chaos. The President rhett o rick Mar 2014 #63
Maybe they're still trying to sort things out. GoCubsGo Mar 2014 #65
We the people need to know Rosa Luxemburg Mar 2014 #69
I think most people already knew that. n/t GoCubsGo Mar 2014 #70
The informed people do Rosa Luxemburg Apr 2014 #77
And the shredding truck... dgauss Mar 2014 #54
did you see this excerpt on that blog: ? 2banon Mar 2014 #57
That caught my eye too, the expectation of investigations. dgauss Mar 2014 #61
Not impossible but hard because to press the issue one must be willing to accept TheKentuckian Mar 2014 #30
You know considering the NeoCons chest thumping, and belittling President Obama's anti-aggressive 2banon Mar 2014 #58
Absolutely, an interview with Cheney should be exactly like an interview with Manson. TheKentuckian Mar 2014 #68
Senator Udall pressed for answers.. 2banon Mar 2014 #22
They realized they revealed a little too much in their document dump, LuvNewcastle Mar 2014 #26
"The Panetta Review" was apparently the red flag 2banon Mar 2014 #52
Here is Udall's statement ProSense Mar 2014 #53
If they have nothing to hide about torture then they have nothing to worry about. Tierra_y_Libertad Mar 2014 #33
big K and R. bbgrunt Mar 2014 #34
Obfuscation trumps transparency pscot Mar 2014 #35
Could the information be leaked. Not a Fan Mar 2014 #38
weren't the Pentagon papers read into the Congressional record? grasswire Mar 2014 #48
The Obama administration chose to cover up the crimes of Bush/Cheney Oilwellian Mar 2014 #39
Accountability ended with the 2000 election. Enthusiast Mar 2014 #45
Kicked and recommended a whole bunch. Enthusiast Mar 2014 #46
big important kick nt grasswire Mar 2014 #49
what might be their reasons? n/t wildbilln864 Mar 2014 #50
The Senate should hire Snowden so they could find out what the CIA does. Tierra_y_Libertad Mar 2014 #56
But they are helping...just very slowly. Rex Mar 2014 #60
I'm going to kick this thread until it confesses. Jesus Malverde Mar 2014 #64
It's IS sad that the so called South American "banana republics" have done a better job ... MrMickeysMom Mar 2014 #73
"more than one quarter of all footnotes in the 9/11 Report refer to CIA interrogations" johnnyreb Mar 2014 #67
K&R woo me with science Mar 2014 #71
Kick!!! Great information. haikugal Mar 2014 #76
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»White House withholds tho...»Reply #53