Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: The public option: how many of us remember when and why it died? [View all]backwoodsbob
(6,001 posts)96. the public option died
behind closed doors in a room full of WH staffers and Insurance Execs
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
133 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Excellent recap. It was too complicated for my brain to comprehend back then, but your
Stardust
Mar 2014
#56
This is correct. My recollection is there was the lame "Elections have consequences" line was thrown
TheKentuckian
Mar 2014
#39
That is what I said though I didn't mention subsidies but did use the kickback.
TheKentuckian
Mar 2014
#121
I am loving your posts in this thread. My God, it is wonderful to read from someone who has
Number23
Mar 2014
#110
I was following the hearings and the various iterations of the legislation
BumRushDaShow
Mar 2014
#115
When did the Constitution change from majority rule to super-majority rule? I missed that.
Scuba
Mar 2014
#2
I had to try to guess your point and apparently I got it wrong. So a second try
rhett o rick
Mar 2014
#107
The Senate Filibuster goes back to 1806, and is Constitutional under Article I Section 5
Agnosticsherbet
Mar 2014
#17
He passed the first national healthcare bill in our history, not bad spending of capital.
Agnosticsherbet
Mar 2014
#24
Medicare was not a national healthcare bill. It was Seniors only. The ACA remains the first
Agnosticsherbet
Mar 2014
#32
WHICH. MEANS. EXACTLY. NOTHING. PROFIT. OR. NON-PROFIT. IS. IRRELEVANT. IN. NATIONAL
Agnosticsherbet
Mar 2014
#35
That scenario was necessary because Reid didn't reform the filibuster. n/t
PoliticAverse
Mar 2014
#11
So where on your timeline is the time the leader of the party picked up the phone
BrotherIvan
Mar 2014
#31
I don't agree with Medicare as our model. The entire urge to do so is about marketing
TheKentuckian
Mar 2014
#72
I believe the eye rolling comes from the fact that while those bullet points are good
BrotherIvan
Mar 2014
#49
To date there is no evidence that the ACA has "insured millions of Americans
former9thward
Mar 2014
#43
You're posting a the 2012 census to show that the 2014 law isn't helping millions? n/t
ProSense
Mar 2014
#98
Don't forget Max Baucus, a Democrat, firmly in the pocket of the for profit health care
Cleita
Mar 2014
#62
Didn't you guys tell us Obama never wanted the Public Option? Isn't there video?
WhaTHellsgoingonhere
Mar 2014
#66
This is where I get so angry at the deterioration of our 'representative' government
NCcoast
Mar 2014
#67
That doesn't prevent Democratic candidates from campaigning on Medicare for All.
Loudly
Mar 2014
#77
I remember, two days after that I went to the USPS and re-registered as an Independent
nadinbrzezinski
Mar 2014
#78
"It isn't hard. It certainly isn't impossible." The hard part seems to be...
polichick
Mar 2014
#105
It was crystal clear to me by the Reid, Pelosi, and POTUS tap dance number that they had no
GoneFishin
Mar 2014
#97
+1,000. And the ACA provides the option for it. VT is doing it, PBO or ACA isn't stopping anyone.
freshwest
Mar 2014
#118
We only needed Lieberman. You can't tell me there was nothing we could offered him that would have
grahamhgreen
Mar 2014
#125