General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Do We Really Know That Cats Kill By The Billions? Not So Fast [View all]Cassidy
(223 posts)Nature Communications, the journal in which the Loss et al. study was published, is one of several Nature Group journals. Nature Group articles are peer reviewed.
http://www.nature.com/authors/policies/peer_review.html
When npr's B. King accuses Loss et al. of using "statistical perturbations," I can't help wondering if she also opposes the use of statistics and models by climate scientists. Math is the language of science and statistics is the mathematical language of the real world.
If more data about the cat/bird is useful, you might find this of interest:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cats_in_New_Zealand
Science moves forward by improved hypotheses and analyses being done, not by ad hominen arguments, i.e. "Demonizing cats with shaky statistics...," used against researchers whose conclusions you disagree with.
I think we can agree that spaying or neutering pets is important. I think we can also agree that keeping your cats inside will help them lead a longer and healthier life. Maybe we could focus on that.