Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: If you think that the Congress in 2009/2010 would have passed Single Payer legislation [View all]PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)38. The Wikipedia page on the second bill highlights the modifications...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health_Care_and_Education_Reconciliation_Act_of_2010
Amending the Senate's Healthcare Bill
The Reconciliation bill makes several changes to the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act that was signed into law on March 23, 2010. These changes include the following,
Increasing the tax credits to buy insurance
Eliminates several of the special deals given to senators, such as Ben Nelson's "Cornhusker Kickback"
Lowers the penalty for not buying insurance from $750 to $695
Closes the Medicare Part D "donut hole" by 2020 and gives seniors a rebate of $250.
Delays the implementation on taxing "Cadillac health-care plans" until 2018
Requires doctors who treat Medicare patients be reimbursed at the full rate
Sets up a medicare tax on the unearned incomes of families that earn more than $250,000 annually.
Offer more generous subsidies to lower income groups. Households below 150% of the federal poverty level would pay 2% to 4% of their income on premiums. Health plans would cover 94% of the cost of benefits.[19] Households with incomes from 150% to 400% of the federal poverty level ($88,200 for a family of four) would pay on a sliding scale from 4% to 9.8% of their income on premiums, rest will be covered by government advanceable, refundable tax credit. Health plans would cover 70% of the cost of the benefits.
In 2014, if a company with more than 50 workers does not offer coverage, they will be obligated to pay $2,000 for each full-time worker in the company, exempting the money due for the first 30 employees. For example, an employer with 53 workers will pay the penalty for 23 workers, or $46,000.
Would increase Medicaid payment rates to primary care doctors to match Medicare payment rates, which are higher, in 2013 and 2014.
The federal government would pay all of the costs of expanding Medicaid under the reform until 2016, 95% in 2017, 94% in 2018, 93% in 2019, and 90% thereafter. Some states that already insure childless adults under Medicaid would receive more federal money for covering that group through 2018.
The Medicare patients will receive 50% discount on brand-name drugs would begin in 2011. By 2020, the government would pay to provide up to 75% discount on brand-name and generic drugs, eventually closing the coverage gap.
Would extend the ban on lifetime limits and rescission of coverage to all existing health plans within six months after signing into Law.
The Reconciliation bill makes several changes to the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act that was signed into law on March 23, 2010. These changes include the following,
Increasing the tax credits to buy insurance
Eliminates several of the special deals given to senators, such as Ben Nelson's "Cornhusker Kickback"
Lowers the penalty for not buying insurance from $750 to $695
Closes the Medicare Part D "donut hole" by 2020 and gives seniors a rebate of $250.
Delays the implementation on taxing "Cadillac health-care plans" until 2018
Requires doctors who treat Medicare patients be reimbursed at the full rate
Sets up a medicare tax on the unearned incomes of families that earn more than $250,000 annually.
Offer more generous subsidies to lower income groups. Households below 150% of the federal poverty level would pay 2% to 4% of their income on premiums. Health plans would cover 94% of the cost of benefits.[19] Households with incomes from 150% to 400% of the federal poverty level ($88,200 for a family of four) would pay on a sliding scale from 4% to 9.8% of their income on premiums, rest will be covered by government advanceable, refundable tax credit. Health plans would cover 70% of the cost of the benefits.
In 2014, if a company with more than 50 workers does not offer coverage, they will be obligated to pay $2,000 for each full-time worker in the company, exempting the money due for the first 30 employees. For example, an employer with 53 workers will pay the penalty for 23 workers, or $46,000.
Would increase Medicaid payment rates to primary care doctors to match Medicare payment rates, which are higher, in 2013 and 2014.
The federal government would pay all of the costs of expanding Medicaid under the reform until 2016, 95% in 2017, 94% in 2018, 93% in 2019, and 90% thereafter. Some states that already insure childless adults under Medicaid would receive more federal money for covering that group through 2018.
The Medicare patients will receive 50% discount on brand-name drugs would begin in 2011. By 2020, the government would pay to provide up to 75% discount on brand-name and generic drugs, eventually closing the coverage gap.
Would extend the ban on lifetime limits and rescission of coverage to all existing health plans within six months after signing into Law.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
143 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
If you think that the Congress in 2009/2010 would have passed Single Payer legislation [View all]
Yavin4
Mar 2014
OP
You are aware that Lieberman lost his primary and ran as an Independent?
LiberalAndProud
Mar 2014
#81
well, I know some progressive party activists and they pretty much turned it around
CTyankee
Mar 2014
#136
Good point about single payer. Also, the public option didn't even make it out of committee
Cali_Democrat
Mar 2014
#4
It didn't make it our of committee because they arrested people that brought Single Payer up.
RC
Mar 2014
#128
Silly Sanders. All he had to do was read DU and he wouldn't have made that statement!!1!(one)!!
Cali_Democrat
Mar 2014
#9
That was a different bill, separate from the original ACA. You could call it 'ACA part II' or
PoliticAverse
Mar 2014
#28
Um, right. As I pointed out it was a separate bill that modified the original ACA. n/t
PoliticAverse
Mar 2014
#33
And the weakness of party leaders who couldn't figure out a way to get the coalition.
morningfog
Mar 2014
#115
No. Harry Reid could have ended the filibuster rule any time he wanted, as long as at least
Zorra
Mar 2014
#14
Bernie Sanders said single payer would have had only 8 to 10 votes and that's it
Cali_Democrat
Mar 2014
#16
I apologize. I didn't see that specific question and I really didn't understand what you were
cui bono
Mar 2014
#74
No, I expect you to provide a mechanism that can actually get Lieberman's vote.
jeff47
Mar 2014
#139
Or you could just say "I reduce everything you said to something you didn't say".
cui bono
Mar 2014
#142
I've spotted folks every bluedog as a YES, and asked them to describe how ...
JoePhilly
Mar 2014
#39
there's so much deal-making and horse-trading that goes on to get bills passed
steve2470
Mar 2014
#52
Ah being called an "extremist" for advocating what Iraq and Afganistan have setup under US control
bobduca
Mar 2014
#75
If you think we the people were represented by no possibility of it whatsoever, I have a bridge to
mother earth
Mar 2014
#57
BS - go to pnhp.org 10,000+ doctors for single payer? SP is cheaper than the ACA.
grahamhgreen
Mar 2014
#91
there was real ignorance of CT Dems and the general voting population in CT in 2006
CTyankee
Mar 2014
#123
If you think there was NOTHING the President of The United States of America had to
grahamhgreen
Mar 2014
#87
Lieberman ran against Obama, campaigned for McCain and tutored Palin on foreign policy.
phleshdef
Mar 2014
#94
Then fire him. Just find out what he wants (say bombs for Isreal) and make the deal. One guy...
grahamhgreen
Mar 2014
#95
You believe there is nothing the President of the USA had that Lieberman would have traded his vote
grahamhgreen
Mar 2014
#97
Yes. Lieberman's ties to the insurance industry were/are a hell of a lot more important to him.
phleshdef
Mar 2014
#98
President has access to more $ than all the insurers combined. Now you're saying big insurance
grahamhgreen
Mar 2014
#99
In the end, we both agree Leiberman is corrupt. I believe the President had items in his hand
grahamhgreen
Mar 2014
#143
I'm say ing you offer him SOS, then fire him if he doesn't live up to expectations. In the end,
grahamhgreen
Mar 2014
#135
Of course not. They were well paid by Insurance industry (esp Lieberman) to block single-payer.
HooptieWagon
Mar 2014
#103
As I stated earlier, this one hour PBS documentary explains a lot. Please give it a try.
Trust Buster
Mar 2014
#104
+1 yes that is a must see for anyone that wants to know what happened
nationalize the fed
Mar 2014
#120
My 'favorite' post was that SP would have passed because the majority of citizens supported it...LOL
DebJ
Mar 2014
#116
So when I order an omelet for breakfast and instead get cold, flavorless oatmeal, I should be happy?
Vashta Nerada
Mar 2014
#126
The problem with my way or the highway was highlighted in 2000. Sometimes one needs to
lostincalifornia
Mar 2014
#129