Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BainsBane

(57,771 posts)
13. If you don't understand the conception of the state as a human body
Mon Mar 24, 2014, 10:11 PM
Mar 2014

You don't understand fascism, as that is how the corporatist state is envisioned under fascism. The Wikipedia article specifically says that fascism replaced the class conflict of capitalism with conflict between states and races. It is not simply capitalism. That existed before fascism and has continued to exist after. Fascism was a way of coopting the revolutionary potential of the working class into the state, for the purposes of the state. The corporatist state did not simply incorporate business interests but also workers and other sectors, like the military and agriculture.

Corporatism (or corporativism) is the socio-political organization of a society by major interest groups, or corporate groups, such as agricultural, business, ethnic, labour, military, patronage, or scientific affiliations, on the basis of common interests.[1] Corporatism is theoretically based upon the interpretation of a community as an organic body.[2][3] The term corporatism is based on the Latin root word "corpus" (plural – "corpora&quot meaning "body".[3

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corporatism


Fascism's theory of economic corporatism involved management of sectors of the economy by government or privately controlled organizations (corporations). Each trade union or employer corporation would, theoretically, represent its professional concerns, especially by negotiation of labour contracts and the like. This method, it was theorized, could result in harmony amongst social classes.[30] Authors have noted, however, that de facto economic corporatism was also used to reduce opposition and reward political loyalty.[31]

In Italy from 1922 until 1943, corporatism became influential amongst Italian nationalists led by Benito Mussolini. The Charter of Carnaro gained much popularity as the prototype of a 'corporative state', having displayed much within its tenets as a guild system combining the concepts of autonomy and authority in a special synthesis.[32] This appealed to Hegelian thinkers who were seeking a new alternative to popular socialism and syndicalism which was also a progressive system of governing labour and still a new way of relating to political governance. Alfredo Rocco spoke of a corporative state and declared corporatist ideology in detail. Rocco would later become a member of the Italian Fascist regime Fascismo.[33]

Italian Fascism involved a corporatist political system in which economy was collectively managed by employers, workers and state officials by formal mechanisms at the national level.[34] This non-elected form of state officializing of every interest into the state was professed to reduce the marginalization of singular interests (as would allegedly happen by the unilateral end condition inherent in the democratic voting process). Corporatism would instead better recognize or 'incorporate' every divergent interest into the state organically, according to its supporters, thus being the inspiration for their use of the term totalitarian, perceivable to them as not meaning a coercive system but described distinctly as without coercion in the 1932 Doctrine of Fascism as thus:

Benito Mussolini
When brought within the orbit of the State, Fascism recognizes the real needs which gave rise to socialism and trade unionism, giving them due weight in the guild or corporative system in which divergent interests are coordinated and harmonized in the unity of the State.[35]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corporatism



Other governments have used the model of the corporate state without the intense focus on nationalism and ethnic enemies that were part of fascism. Examples include populist governments in Brazil (Vargas' later years); Argentina under Peron, and the PRI in Mexico.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Ex-con becomes private pr...»Reply #13