Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: I've been on this site since Ariana Huffington owned it in the early 1990's [View all]csziggy
(34,189 posts)163. That had to be after they gave up on IP over Avian Carriers
In computer networking, IP over Avian Carriers (IPoAC) is a humorously-intended proposal to carry Internet Protocol (IP) traffic by birds such as homing pigeons. IP over Avian Carriers was initially described in RFC 1149, a Request for Comments (RFC) issued by the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) written by D. Waitzman and released on April 1, 1990. It is one of several April Fools' Day RFCs.
Waitzman described an improvement of his protocol in RFC 2549, IP over Avian Carriers with Quality of Service (1 April 1999). Later, in RFC 6214 released on 1 April 2011, and 13 years after the introduction of IPv6, Carpenter and Hinden published Adaptation of RFC 1149 for IPv6.[1]
IPoAC has been successfully implemented, but for only nine packets of data, with a packet loss ratio of 55% (due to user error),[2] and a response time ranging from 3000 seconds (~54 minutes) to over 6000 seconds (~1.77 hours). Thus, this technology suffers from poor latency. Nevertheless, for large transfers, avian carriers are capable of high average throughput when carrying flash memory devices, effectively implementing a sneakernet. During the last 20 years, the information density of storage media and thus the bandwidth of an Avian Carrier has increased 3 times faster than the bandwidth of the Internet.[3] IPoAC may achieve bandwidth peaks of orders of magnitude more than the Internet when used with multiple Avian Carriers in rural areas. For example: If 16 homing pigeons are given eight 32 GB SD cards each, and take an hour to reach their destination, the throughput of the transfer would be 9102 Mbit/s, excluding transfer to and from the SD cards.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IP_over_Avian_Carriers
Waitzman described an improvement of his protocol in RFC 2549, IP over Avian Carriers with Quality of Service (1 April 1999). Later, in RFC 6214 released on 1 April 2011, and 13 years after the introduction of IPv6, Carpenter and Hinden published Adaptation of RFC 1149 for IPv6.[1]
IPoAC has been successfully implemented, but for only nine packets of data, with a packet loss ratio of 55% (due to user error),[2] and a response time ranging from 3000 seconds (~54 minutes) to over 6000 seconds (~1.77 hours). Thus, this technology suffers from poor latency. Nevertheless, for large transfers, avian carriers are capable of high average throughput when carrying flash memory devices, effectively implementing a sneakernet. During the last 20 years, the information density of storage media and thus the bandwidth of an Avian Carrier has increased 3 times faster than the bandwidth of the Internet.[3] IPoAC may achieve bandwidth peaks of orders of magnitude more than the Internet when used with multiple Avian Carriers in rural areas. For example: If 16 homing pigeons are given eight 32 GB SD cards each, and take an hour to reach their destination, the throughput of the transfer would be 9102 Mbit/s, excluding transfer to and from the SD cards.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IP_over_Avian_Carriers
http://www.blug.linux.no/rfc1149/writeup.html
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
187 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I've been on this site since Ariana Huffington owned it in the early 1990's [View all]
Stargazer99
Mar 2014
OP
You have to applaud the prescience of FDR to greenlight creation of the internet, though. nt
Dreamer Tatum
Mar 2014
#14
I thought it was ol Abe Lincoln, right after he invented the internet webs
Champion Jack
Mar 2014
#88
Well, that was nothing compared to the sweet click-click-clacking of a telegraph key!
Ikonoklast
Mar 2014
#128
It's really amazing how far we've come since half the freaking population is beyond stupid. nt
ChisolmTrailDem
Mar 2014
#171
It was a pain in the ass feeding all those cards in during a flame-thread.
Hassin Bin Sober
Mar 2014
#29
Yeah, it got so bad the Eastside and Westside had to have their own discussion folders.
Codeine
Mar 2014
#31
Arianna Huffington was Michael Huffington's beard back in the early nineties
Brother Buzz
Mar 2014
#23
She was grooming him for a presidential run.Taking the Santa Barbara US Congressional seat was step1
Hekate
Mar 2014
#56
He only lasted one term because of that bombastic idea of running for Senate.
Brother Buzz
Mar 2014
#83
I was here when the epic flamewars between the Greek and Trojan apologists took place.
Democracyinkind
Mar 2014
#34
Yes I agree, lets shove it down their throats. Must have a couple of web sites open
Autumn
Mar 2014
#41
...mainly because half the people i was with at the time believed it until i explained it to them...
dionysus
Mar 2014
#55
Ah, the big arguments we had here when Kepler announced his laws of planetary motion!
struggle4progress
Mar 2014
#66
I wonder what happened to all those folk who got banned during the arguments over Clovis Points
struggle4progress
Mar 2014
#70
Yes, I remember because DU was in the list of doors right above Food Fight!
TroglodyteScholar
Mar 2014
#123
You know what they say... "slow on the uptake - slow on the turnpike"
Warren DeMontague
Mar 2014
#143
.. / .-.. --- ...- . / - .... .. ... / - .... .-. . .- -.. / ... --- / -- ..- -.-. .... /
Electric Monk
Mar 2014
#117
It was a big scoop when DU reported that the Germans had bombed Pearl Harbor
tularetom
Mar 2014
#127
I remember the threads about whether cosmic inflation would be a good idea
muriel_volestrangler
Mar 2014
#151
The way I see it, aint no difference between a UFO, and a time machine.
Warren DeMontague
Mar 2014
#168