Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

malthaussen

(18,524 posts)
51. George MacDonald Fraser
Mon Mar 26, 2012, 06:14 AM
Mar 2012

Wrote of his grandmother, who being Scots was a dedicated golfer. Her approach was the opposite of yours: she "strode grimly around the golf course" and diligently recorded each stroke, with a tight-lipped smile. From the description, you'd think she wasn't having any fun at all, although of course she was. It is an interesting contrast of attitudes. You find it in computer game afficianados, one camp of which eschews all "cheating," in the form of, say, character editors or game walkthroughs, and another camp of which thinks that the whole concept of "cheating" in a computer game is ridiculous. Which usually prompts the response, "Yes, but you're cheating yourself." I have a mad theory that what accounts for this difference is that some people evalutate themselves by external opinions, while others evaluate themselves by internal opinions. Problem with that concept is that even "internal" opinions must ultimately have an external source.

Best ball is good, unless everybody drives it into the rough, in which case it's time for some Mulligans. But I really am much to stiff and creaky to even take a swing with anything longer than a 5-iron. I'd need to knock off about 20 years of rust before I could even get around a course.

-- Mal

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Why do we condone violence? [View all] malthaussen Mar 2012 OP
Because we're a bunch of friken ANIMALS. MADem Mar 2012 #1
Except, MADem, that animals are not nearly so violent malthaussen Mar 2012 #2
Sure they are--when it matters to them. It just matters less. MADem Mar 2012 #4
Fair distinction malthaussen Mar 2012 #6
Valid question. MADem Mar 2012 #29
Wouldn't that be predicated on the assumption... malthaussen Mar 2012 #30
Or maybe it's all down to "There's money to be made?" MADem Mar 2012 #31
If I didn't know better, I'd suspect you of cynicism. malthaussen Mar 2012 #32
Maybe murder and rape have come to be regarded as the cost of doing business? MADem Mar 2012 #33
And of course, in cases of rape, she's only a woman malthaussen Mar 2012 #34
It's a rather odious theory--but that doesn't make it untrue. MADem Mar 2012 #36
We are definitely competition-oriented, to extremes malthaussen Mar 2012 #38
Indeed. MADem Mar 2012 #39
Ever see the BC comic about golf? malthaussen Mar 2012 #40
Feuerstein is a bit of a local hero--his story is oft-repeated in MA. MADem Mar 2012 #41
I am far too inflexible to swing a club malthaussen Mar 2012 #47
You'd enjoy a "best ball" game. MADem Mar 2012 #49
George MacDonald Fraser malthaussen Mar 2012 #51
We've added the violent tendencies of the reptilian cortex into an active forebrain IDemo Mar 2012 #5
Stipulate that this is true malthaussen Mar 2012 #7
Stipulate which - the human brain structure, or that violence feels good? IDemo Mar 2012 #10
I was thinking more along the lines of a social "cure," malthaussen Mar 2012 #15
Chimps can be quite violent with one another RZM Mar 2012 #22
Yeah, apes even make war on other apes malthaussen Mar 2012 #23
Because basically we are killer apes. hobbit709 Mar 2012 #3
It's that whole survival of the fittest thing that we have instilled in our culture. TNLib Mar 2012 #8
But the question is, if you want to buy the Social Darwinism line malthaussen Mar 2012 #9
They are pro-survival TNLib Mar 2012 #13
Pro- for the individual or clan, perhaps, Ron Green Mar 2012 #14
Which leads us to the question... malthaussen Mar 2012 #16
Good OP with essential question, but I wish you'd been able to write it without BlueIris Mar 2012 #11
We don't just condone violence, it's our national religion gratuitous Mar 2012 #12
"Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent." Isaac Asimov Tierra_y_Libertad Mar 2012 #17
But Ikey was wrong. malthaussen Mar 2012 #18
I certainly don't disagree with you lunatica Mar 2012 #19
IMO the problem is the popular belief in the need to "let off steam" Odin2005 Mar 2012 #20
It's part of the human condition. Johnny Rico Mar 2012 #21
Laws are formulated to regulate the human condition malthaussen Mar 2012 #24
Laws which frequently regulate violence rather than prohibit it. Johnny Rico Mar 2012 #25
Still not satisfactory malthaussen Mar 2012 #26
You mentioned war, and war is sometimes (certainly not always) a rational choice. Johnny Rico Mar 2012 #27
You and Prof de la Paz both malthaussen Mar 2012 #28
It's a very American thing handa Mar 2012 #35
Well, now, depends on your perspective malthaussen Mar 2012 #37
At what point do you prove the assertion that "we condone violence" please? flvegan Mar 2012 #42
At no point malthaussen Mar 2012 #45
Are you referring to that asshole Jim Rome? JonLP24 Mar 2012 #43
Thanks for refreshing my memory malthaussen Mar 2012 #46
I said what he did was wrong JonLP24 Mar 2012 #48
You did say it was wrong malthaussen Mar 2012 #50
Did Rome want to press charges? JonLP24 Mar 2012 #52
America has been at war for about 212 years out of its 236 year existence chnoutte Mar 2012 #44
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Why do we condone violenc...»Reply #51