Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Kagan Throws Scalia's Own Religious Liberty Arguments Back In His Face - TPMDC [View all]pnwmom
(109,388 posts)65. Good question. Who had standing? n/t
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
93 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Kagan Throws Scalia's Own Religious Liberty Arguments Back In His Face - TPMDC [View all]
WillyT
Mar 2014
OP
Hope she has better luck with scalia and his fellow vermin than she did with Citizens United.
calimary
Mar 2014
#3
The other ACA case worries me a lot more -- the one that would take away subsidies
pnwmom
Mar 2014
#5
After you made your comment I added comments regarding the other cases that are factors
happyslug
Mar 2014
#22
There are many differences between the pacifist denied unemployment benefits and Hobby Lobby.
SunSeeker
Mar 2014
#32
So, what religion is against paying taxes, 'cause I want to join that one
justiceischeap
Mar 2014
#11
I boldly predict that Scalia will ignore his own logic and vote to restrict women's healthcare.
Bucky
Mar 2014
#13
Yup. Does anyone believe anymore that these cases are decided by legal reasoning? nt
Jerry442
Mar 2014
#16
Legal theories are but a smorgasbord of fig leaves to cover the result the SCOTUS wants to reach.
SunSeeker
Mar 2014
#20
Scalito are hacks and worthless to our society as a whole. They are corporate shills
mdbl
Mar 2014
#26
Never mind, Tony will just invoke the "this time only, no precedents are to be set by this"
yellowcanine
Mar 2014
#24
Hear Hear, Sir: These People Want To Impose Their Religious Views On Their Employees
The Magistrate
Mar 2014
#53
The compelling interest test for a constitutional exemption being thrown out the window
Fred Sanders
Mar 2014
#35
P.S.: since any employer is free to not provide medical insurance at all, leaving employees
Fred Sanders
Mar 2014
#41
I wonder if that pompous, arrogant prick Fat Tony realizes he just got smashed and bested
Nanjing to Seoul
Mar 2014
#66
The CONservatives (not so) secretly want to replace Civil law with far rightwing "Biblical law."
blkmusclmachine
Mar 2014
#68
Don't count on a favorable ruiling. This is the court the endowed corps with personhood.
olegramps
Mar 2014
#74
Bush v Gore should have settled once and for all that right wingers on the bench
yurbud
Mar 2014
#92