Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: I find the Hobby Lobby case to be so deeply offensive, it's impossible to describe. [View all]Calista241
(5,632 posts)49. Clarification
Someone told me earlier that hobby lobby wasn't trying to ban "the pill" (standard ongoing birth control medication), but was only protesting having to supply the "morning after pill."
Basically, they said preventing a pregnancy from starting was legit medical care, but that terminating a pregnancy, even one that's only a day old, was against their beliefs.
Is there any truth to this, or is it bullshit?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
136 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I find the Hobby Lobby case to be so deeply offensive, it's impossible to describe. [View all]
mountain grammy
Mar 2014
OP
I consider this case to be blasphemy. Since when do they think they can judge as a
roguevalley
Mar 2014
#17
Agree! "Fuck them and this bill." They are all about dominance, persecution and
RKP5637
Mar 2014
#52
I have very little respect for some of SCOTUS, and marginal respect for congress. n/t
RKP5637
Mar 2014
#91
Actually, in the big picture IMO companies should not be in the business of providing
RKP5637
Mar 2014
#134
Thank you, and yes, that was eye opening.. and just another reason to despise Rmoney
mountain grammy
Mar 2014
#35
And my mother, who had 8 children, went "visiting" some friends in another city
SharonAnn
Mar 2014
#104
Next time a corporation's products or actions cause the death of someone
Nanjing to Seoul
Mar 2014
#12
Definitely! The way I see this is if this is OK'ed then corporate execs are liable personally and
RKP5637
Mar 2014
#136
The cards are so stacked, many are eventually just not going to give a fuck about the
RKP5637
Mar 2014
#93
The hell with walking on eggshells! This is an all out assault on the first amendment
mountain grammy
Mar 2014
#38
Yep. This infuriates me. Why doesn't the press bring this up? Pisses me off even more. n/t
Tess49
Mar 2014
#89
to extend ones religious beliefs on to others as under the guise religious freedom
azurnoir
Mar 2014
#16
This is a gender based inquisition imposed incrementally. People better wake up!!!
kairos12
Mar 2014
#99
This is how you begin replacing Civil law with far rightwing "Biblical law."
blkmusclmachine
Mar 2014
#21
I used to have a "poly" family member who worked there so I kept my mouth shut.
tavalon
Mar 2014
#22
My husband has turned off the teevee.. he's tired of hearing me ranting every time
mountain grammy
Mar 2014
#48
Anyone who has defended religious leaders who attack choice and LGBT equality
Bluenorthwest
Mar 2014
#46
Implantation does not occur immediately upon ferilization of the egg within the potential mother.
JDPriestly
Mar 2014
#107
If that's correct, then it's a whole lot less offensive that was described to me
mostlyconfused
Mar 2014
#126
Absolutely right on. It is a overt discrimination against women by trying to impose a corporations
lostincalifornia
Mar 2014
#51
Their argument is completely bogus, the very definition of a "frivolous lawsuit"
mountain grammy
Mar 2014
#62
I believe the case is silly and frivolous, but a HL win would be an unimaginable assault
mountain grammy
Mar 2014
#71
I've now switched to loathing religion. I just fucken hate it! For years I was neutral, but with
RKP5637
Mar 2014
#63
In essence, they are working to open the door IMO to alternative government and
RKP5637
Mar 2014
#83
This could potentially have far more damaging consequences than 10 Citizens Uniteds.
Initech
Mar 2014
#95
And don't use contraceptives when you do. Then they can deal with a rape baby. oh bad. n/t
DebJ
Mar 2014
#97
I think that if the Supreme Court decides in favor of Hobby Lobby, a lot of men will find
JDPriestly
Mar 2014
#106
What's really ridiculous is that the vast majority of their employees are female
TexasBushwhacker
Mar 2014
#109
Thanks for the link to Aunt Peaches. Will be recommending her to my crafter friends.
mountain grammy
Mar 2014
#131
The rich are using their wealth to legislate in their favor - they will always
pragmatic_dem
Mar 2014
#113