Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

jmowreader

(53,202 posts)
15. The passage doesn't say "shellfish"
Wed Mar 26, 2014, 01:47 PM
Mar 2014

It says, "anything in the water that hath not fins nor scales, that shall be an abomination unto you." This means that not only are shellfish prohibited, but crustaceans like crawdads, lobsters and crabs, and also catfish.

I used to pass a Pentecostal church every morning on my way to work. One fine day this was on the church sign:

'Thou shalt not lie with mankind as with womankind; it is abomination.' - Lev. 18.22

Oyster Roast - Sunday


The problem with this sign is, the same book of the Bible that tells you not to screw other men also tells you not to eat oysters. And to me, the part about oysters was more important than the part about screwing men. Here's why:

Go through Leviticus 18 and you'll notice one common thread: all the sex acts they don't want you doing are ones that won't make healthy Levite babies. We know fucking your relatives leads to all your less-than-pleasant recessive traits becoming dominant. We know fucking other guys' wives leads to their husbands sending very large men to your house to cut off your dick and then your head. And we know gay sex doesn't lead to pregnancy. But here's the thing: You have six wives. You got all of them pregnant. Women can only maintain one pregnancy at a time. Until one of your wives has her child and is ready to get pregnant again, you can have all the gay sex you want and not affect the production of Levites one whit.

Understanding the oyster prohibition requires knowing about the three forms of shellfish poisoning - neurotoxic, paralytic and amnesic. They come from microorganisms in the water and they can be lethal. I am certain the doctors back then saw lots of this and learned that the people presenting with it had all eaten clams or oysters. They didn't have marine biologists in biblical times to track the red tides. They did know that if they put "this is abomination" in the laws, people would stop eating shellfish and the problem would be solved. That is what they did.

So...no gay sex because you need to reserve your dick for making babies...or no shellfish because they might kill you. Which is more important?

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

It also says those who eat Pork , Shellfish or wear more than one type of clothe....wear does that pkdu Mar 2014 #1
If crawdads are shellfish, he better put lots of sunblock in his coffin riqster Mar 2014 #2
The passage doesn't say "shellfish" jmowreader Mar 2014 #15
From tribal continuation perspective, both are crucial. riqster Mar 2014 #20
And it was critical that the men chosen for this task be highly productive jmowreader Mar 2014 #22
Keep that quiver full! riqster Mar 2014 #23
Man, you got it down to a science........... something the xstian reichwing nuts don't like either. TxVietVet Mar 2014 #29
Catfish have fins. louis-t Mar 2014 #31
They don't have scales, and the scripture requires both jmowreader Mar 2014 #34
Not to defend the guy but those laws don't apply to Gentiles. dilby Mar 2014 #10
New Testament? Almost nothing. riqster Mar 2014 #21
One thing I remind Religious People both Christian and Jews dilby Mar 2014 #24
And don't forget that remarriage after a divorce is adultery. Mariana Mar 2014 #25
La la la we're not listening... NightWatcher Mar 2014 #3
Yeah, it's in the Bible. To which I would tell him, it's also in the Qu'ran. Jgarrick Mar 2014 #4
He is of course absolutely correct whatthehey Mar 2014 #5
An ignorant bigot from a family of ignorant white southern RW religious bigots preaches hate in the Zorra Mar 2014 #6
Who moved my goddam fainting couch?! Jeff In Milwaukee Mar 2014 #9
Hope he isn't relying on the King James version PumpkinAle Mar 2014 #7
Apparently the ignorant apple doesn't fall far from the ignorant tree...knr joeybee12 Mar 2014 #8
I wonder how many LGBT are in the whole Robertson family? Playinghardball Mar 2014 #11
New season starting? superpatriotman Mar 2014 #12
Hell and the bible LostOne4Ever Mar 2014 #13
for the win frylock Mar 2014 #35
I wish Phil's comment about happy "blacks" in the pre-civil rights south had received more attention Mike Daniels Mar 2014 #14
Dork Dynasty is so last year. City Lights Mar 2014 #16
Now I get it -- they are related to Pat Robertson! Blue Owl Mar 2014 #17
Male Prostitutes????? HockeyMom Mar 2014 #18
Translation TlalocW Mar 2014 #19
He really shouldn't treat his target audience that way BeyondGeography Mar 2014 #26
When you have a choice between living in hell Aerows Mar 2014 #27
"Heaven for the climate, hell for the conversation." Mark Twain Tierra_y_Libertad Mar 2014 #28
Wait...the greedy, slanderers, swindlers? louis-t Mar 2014 #30
G-d also decreed that their ratings would tank due this idiot's comments Gothmog Mar 2014 #32
All those who preach, or otherwise stir up, hate are going to hell indepat Mar 2014 #33
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Duck Dynasty star: Gays a...»Reply #15