Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Divide and Conquer - Machiavelli Understood [View all]HereSince1628
(36,063 posts)24. Yes, for Mary's sake (lets get in all the saints) the party is divided into FACTIONS
and that is BECAUSE the factions are not working to make America more progressive.
This is what we see. And it isn't everyone bringing something to make mulligan stew.
The DLC was a BY INVITATION ONLY FACTION, very UNDEMOCRATIC, and it's policies were built on the radical idea that the US could be a post-industrial nation of consumers via the counter intuitive notiong that favorable consideration of INTERNATIONAL FINANCING, GLOBALIZATION, and OFF-SHORING would be better for the nation than making sure that all consumers had income to spend
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
80 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
"...we should all agree that movement toward a more progressive United States is a goal..."
HereSince1628
Mar 2014
#3
You may not, but the party is divided...at least one group even has adopted names
HereSince1628
Mar 2014
#18
Yes, for Mary's sake (lets get in all the saints) the party is divided into FACTIONS
HereSince1628
Mar 2014
#24
IMO, you are an apologist for your own belief, which, my friend, has the cart and horse reversed
HereSince1628
Mar 2014
#66
Fear of the other party isn't a progressive goal, it is an enabler of manipulation.
HereSince1628
Mar 2014
#74
So what should a candidate say to those Republicans to get them to support them?
JoePhilly
Mar 2014
#44
We need to pull together or Nate Silver is going to be right. We cannot win when we are trashing our
jwirr
Mar 2014
#7
The folks running with D's next to their names, need to provide issues/positions that rally people.
HereSince1628
Mar 2014
#32
Interestingly enough, the literal translation is more appropriate in this case...
malthaussen
Mar 2014
#41
We are divided by our Dem leaders and the personality cult that enables them. nt
Demo_Chris
Mar 2014
#50
I think not. Even strongly divided, the GOP has found a way to make gains.
SleeplessinSoCal
Mar 2014
#65