Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: I am naive. I thought there were limits... places folks wouldn't go. [View all]ProSense
(116,464 posts)5. The President
To see Obama defended by revising the history of the Iraq War, by soft-pedaling its seriousness... that is in some dark place well beyond mere irony.
It is the Iraq F'ing War. And for Americans it should be "never again." And that means not letting it drift into some historical grab-ass zone.
It is the Iraq F'ing War. And for Americans it should be "never again." And that means not letting it drift into some historical grab-ass zone.
...did not revise history. At this point it's simply piling onto a flawed spin. I mean, you posted this yesterday:
It is spin to say Obama defended the Iraq War and it is spin to say he did not. "The Iraq War" is a broad rhetorical category.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10024734885
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
104 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I am naive. I thought there were limits... places folks wouldn't go. [View all]
cthulu2016
Mar 2014
OP
The nub of the issue is evidenced in numerous threads on this site in the past 12 hours.
2banon
Mar 2014
#8
I reject that wholly...the claim is specific and the evidence for it should be as well
alcibiades_mystery
Mar 2014
#10
The OP made a claim...if posts proving it are "numerous," then supporting it shouldn't too hard
alcibiades_mystery
Mar 2014
#18
I'm not defending anything: I'm asking you to substantiate your argument
alcibiades_mystery
Mar 2014
#26
I have just experienced what the OP is talking about. I was just told here on DU that Bush/Cheney
sabrina 1
Mar 2014
#43
If it's too time and labor sensitive for you, it's even more so for those of us who don't believe
pnwmom
Mar 2014
#22
There you are, right on time. Would you care to provide some links to the conversation
sabrina 1
Mar 2014
#44
Amazing, isn't it? Even Colin Powell doubted the legality they were claiming.
sabrina 1
Mar 2014
#101
Happy to see this. We've disagreed on another geopolitical matter, but in complete agreement with
2banon
Mar 2014
#9
President Obama is in a tough position, but that's no excuse. Russia is taking advantage of
rhett o rick
Mar 2014
#15
It kind of puts us in the same position we are claiming Russia is in, doesn't it?
sabrina 1
Mar 2014
#46
We can and should object. We certainly should advocate doing the right thing.
rhett o rick
Mar 2014
#58
Yes, but without Iraq, does he beat Hillary in the primaries. That's the question.
dawg
Mar 2014
#39
One of the main reasons, certainly one of my main reasons for supporting him.
sabrina 1
Mar 2014
#47
If there is one thing the Democratic Party is missing, it's political courage.
Maedhros
Mar 2014
#103
Well said. Anyone who defends the lead up to the Iraq War should be embarrassed
cui bono
Mar 2014
#35
That's right! No less than 100% pure anti-Americanism should be allowed!
ConservativeDemocrat
Mar 2014
#42
Before you send some farm kid off to die, make sure he's protecting the U.S.
ConservativeDemocrat
Mar 2014
#88
There are more Conservative Democrats than Very Liberal Democrats in the party
ConservativeDemocrat
Mar 2014
#100
Amazing, right? Like only anti-American types could make such a big deal out of the Iraq War.
cthulu2016
Mar 2014
#55
There is no constructive point to anything related to Benghazi, it's a full-on loser
BeyondGeography
Mar 2014
#68
I just had someone saying we shouldn't prosecute war criminals because impeaching Clinton
cui bono
Mar 2014
#66
Maybe first you could identify where any U.S. Administration has been tried for war crimes
BeyondGeography
Mar 2014
#69
Don't forget, Nixon let LBJ slide, if you want to play the war crimes game
BeyondGeography
Mar 2014
#83