Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Given that this is a forum for Democrats, I'm all for getting rid of anyone who is not for [View all]mindwalker_i
(4,407 posts)317. your interpretation of the mission statement
isn't the only one. That why I don't go around accusing people of not following it - my interpretation is likely different than theirs. Like I said, everyone supports democrats in the way they think is right. Yeah, we disagree, and we fight about it. That means you have no right to say everyone has to follow your interpretation.
Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
338 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Given that this is a forum for Democrats, I'm all for getting rid of anyone who is not for [View all]
Sarah Ibarruri
Mar 2014
OP
I'll get the kindling. We can burn them to death. I just love a good mob.
DisgustipatedinCA
Mar 2014
#1
Not only that, but who gets to define Democratic goals? Or has that been changed to be
djean111
Mar 2014
#7
The mission statement, which I just posted, states clearly that it's a board to help elect MORE
Sarah Ibarruri
Mar 2014
#9
Um, no - I was speaking in terms of the general electorate - the people who don't frequent
djean111
Mar 2014
#80
when discussion and participation is censored because some don't like it, then we are
roguevalley
Mar 2014
#273
The reason I posted the mission statement, was not because I wanted to decorate my OP
Sarah Ibarruri
Mar 2014
#279
When DU started Republicans were in power and every Democrat was in the underground.
pnwmom
Mar 2014
#128
Wow, you are right, not even a star member, and they get to decide who is purged. Hmmmmmm
quinnox
Mar 2014
#19
On both DU 2 and DU 3 all tombstoning or ppr's have always been handed out only by
Bluenorthwest
Mar 2014
#24
Did he stop being a Democrat when he became President for the second term?
VanillaRhapsody
Mar 2014
#175
It doesn't matter that HE is not electable...HE will be influential....for years to come...
VanillaRhapsody
Mar 2014
#231
No actually he is eligible to run for any other political office other than
totodeinhere
Mar 2014
#312
By the way, that is going to make a few Canadians and other foreigners rather unhappy
quinnox
Mar 2014
#12
If they're for Democrats, that's fine. Read the mission statement. It's in my OP nt
Sarah Ibarruri
Mar 2014
#15
or we could get rid of the people who are not "politically liberal" lol but that would decimate the
msongs
Mar 2014
#17
The mission statement is quite clear what DEMOCRATIC Underground is about nt
Sarah Ibarruri
Mar 2014
#23
"the Owners" wrote the mission statement....I think they knew what they meant...
VanillaRhapsody
Mar 2014
#178
See that is the part being overlooked.....at some point they do...during election cycles...and what
VanillaRhapsody
Mar 2014
#233
Can we just chill out and acknowledge that support does not require blind allegiance to
hlthe2b
Mar 2014
#26
and pay attention to the MEANING of the words DEMOCRATIC, LIBERAL and PROGRESSIVE
Skittles
Mar 2014
#29
Yup, and they're anti-Democrat. I say they create their own blog for their anti-Democratic ideas nt
Sarah Ibarruri
Mar 2014
#34
Certainly not coming here to talk *to* people, but rather talk *at* people. It wastes our time here.
freshwest
Mar 2014
#247
"...they feed off DU like vampires..." Exactly! That's what they're doing
Sarah Ibarruri
Mar 2014
#255
He Caucus's WITH the Democrats....he supports the Democratic President AND
VanillaRhapsody
Mar 2014
#186
but it is not ALL he does is it? He supports them and this President....
VanillaRhapsody
Mar 2014
#297
"where politically liberal people can do their part to effect political and social change"
flvegan
Mar 2014
#35
It's a discussion board. We have many opinions we are many people. We discuss. nt
mucifer
Mar 2014
#36
Why Bernie actually supports Democrats....now some members of DU not so much...
VanillaRhapsody
Mar 2014
#191
Indeed! It is the duty of the cadre of the proletariat to defend the vanguard of the proletariat
Douglas Carpenter
Mar 2014
#43
No one is begging people who are against Democrats to join DU. Read the DU Mission Statement nt
Sarah Ibarruri
Mar 2014
#47
I've been here since 2001. No one has to tell me about the Mission Statement.
scarletwoman
Mar 2014
#58
Then I'm glad you read where it says that its intention is to elect MORE Democrats. nt
Sarah Ibarruri
Mar 2014
#62
I vote for Democrats, and I will damn well criticize them if I think they're fucking up.
scarletwoman
Mar 2014
#91
Do you think people hearing you bash them day in and day out is getting more democrats elected?
VanillaRhapsody
Mar 2014
#197
Me too (2001). It's not the first attempted purge, and it won't be the last
DisgustipatedinCA
Mar 2014
#76
Of course I remember that! I have never been more deliriously happy in all my time on DU when that
scarletwoman
Mar 2014
#169
I, uh, er, um... it was algebra! (yeah, that's the ticket...) Each smilie represented a set of 1000!
scarletwoman
Mar 2014
#320
People who have never said a single word positive about Democrats EVER on this board....
VanillaRhapsody
Mar 2014
#194
the FACT is that DU DOES in fact enforce the mission statement during election cycles...
VanillaRhapsody
Mar 2014
#290
You didn't even bother to read the links I posted in one of my other replies to you, did you.
scarletwoman
Mar 2014
#314
Mr. Pitt has clearly been speaking out against our Democratic Party president. If he hates our
Sarah Ibarruri
Mar 2014
#50
SO YOU are here admitting that THIS IS a takeover by Mr Pitt and his "minions" I mean "followers"
VanillaRhapsody
Mar 2014
#209
I don't NEED anything....I have everything I want...AND least of all from you...
VanillaRhapsody
Mar 2014
#238
All your anger, hyperbole, word salads, and shouting might indicate otherwise.
Jesus Malverde
Mar 2014
#243
Wow youre some piece of work if that is truly your opinion...perhaps YOU would be happier joining
Drew Richards
Mar 2014
#127
And historically the people that have called for purges turned out to be the fanatically imbalanced.
Drew Richards
Mar 2014
#168
Nothing about honest criticism implies being actively against electing Democrats.
TroglodyteScholar
Mar 2014
#150
NO, what is "telling" is the the truth in what Skinner had to say about the rat's nest
Cha
Mar 2014
#183
So you can't win an argument against actual liberals, and want to get them all banned. Noted.
LeftyMom
Mar 2014
#52
I'm merely reminding that the Mission Statement says that it's a pro-Democratic Party board, and
Sarah Ibarruri
Mar 2014
#69
I think the anti-Democrats not being on a Democratic Party board would be a great help, don't you?
Sarah Ibarruri
Mar 2014
#148
Sure! Anyone anti-Democratic Party can go find himself an anti-Democratic Party forum elsewhere. nt
Sarah Ibarruri
Mar 2014
#98
There are some differences. Bashing and trashing a Democratic President goes against the mission
Sarah Ibarruri
Mar 2014
#269
Supporting a president with a "D" when they are doing undemocratic things
mindwalker_i
Mar 2014
#277
My position is to be rid of Republicans. I honestly don't know what yours is. I encourage you
Sarah Ibarruri
Mar 2014
#284
I encourage you to read the mission statement and stop playing games. Nite nt
Sarah Ibarruri
Mar 2014
#303
So... Joe Lieberman Was A Democrat... So Was Zell Miller... What Do You Do In Those Cases ???
WillyT
Mar 2014
#74
And Republicans should go to their forum, not to a pro-Democratic Party forum, which this is nt
Sarah Ibarruri
Mar 2014
#86
I find this OP about following the rules to be against the rules. SOP of GD says 'no whining
Bluenorthwest
Mar 2014
#96
There is NEVER a good reason to say 'Fuck You' to Obama on a Democratic website...
Tx4obama
Mar 2014
#199
There is NEVER a good reason to say For President Obama to say on a Democratic website...
madinmaryland
Mar 2014
#210
I think Mr. Pitt needs to stop making his income by attacking Democrats on Democratic Underground nt
Sarah Ibarruri
Mar 2014
#124
But it was fine while he uncovered the malfeasance of the Bush administration?
nadinbrzezinski
Mar 2014
#132
So you believe Mr. Pitt and everyone else here should fall in lock step behind whatever
madinmaryland
Mar 2014
#140
Read the Democratic Underground mission statement. And ask Mr. Pitts to read it as well nt
Sarah Ibarruri
Mar 2014
#143
And what happens when we have TWO candidates, one endorsed by the party
nadinbrzezinski
Mar 2014
#159
I disagree. Trashing the Democratic President is exactly what Republicans do. nt
Sarah Ibarruri
Mar 2014
#229
So go play in the BOG. It meets all your criteria, is boring as hell, and lightly trafficked. /nt
Marr
Mar 2014
#113
When Democrats do the wrong thing, we need to let them know loud and clear that it pisses us off.
Maedhros
Mar 2014
#115
What happens to Democratic candidates who aren't for Democratic goals? n/t
winter is coming
Mar 2014
#147
I'm sure people against Democrats do disagree with the mission statement nt
Sarah Ibarruri
Mar 2014
#158
Are you saying you disagree with the Democratic Underground mission statement? nt
Sarah Ibarruri
Mar 2014
#162
No, I think I'm repeating the Democratic Underground Mission Statement, which is in my op nt
Sarah Ibarruri
Mar 2014
#204
Nothing says "Democratic Party" like lockstep dogmatic adherence to whoever's in charge!
Scootaloo
Mar 2014
#172
Only if I can be all for getting rid of anyone who posts cute kittie OPs in GD...
Violet_Crumble
Mar 2014
#181
Mr. Pitts needs to create his own forum to bash Democrats and to bash our Democratic Party president
Sarah Ibarruri
Mar 2014
#190
Or, perhaps you could create YOUR own forum to bash those who do not blindly support a person
djean111
Mar 2014
#202
Why? I actually agree with the mission statement to elect more Democrats and support Democrats. nt
Sarah Ibarruri
Mar 2014
#207
And it is your opinion that this goat rodeo of a HC system is helping elect Democrats?
BlueStreak
Mar 2014
#215
By your reasoning, all discussion of Obama should be forbidden on this site
BlueStreak
Mar 2014
#237
I'm saying that bashing and trashing our Democratic Party president should not be permitted, yes nt
Sarah Ibarruri
Mar 2014
#239
It is fair to speak factually about the consequences of the President's decision
BlueStreak
Mar 2014
#249
I think you've never seen the Democratic Underground Mission Statement. I have it in my OP nt
Sarah Ibarruri
Mar 2014
#257
You are not listening. I said that bashing a Democratic President is NOT part of the mission
Sarah Ibarruri
Mar 2014
#274
Exactly! And anyone who hates Democrats, or our Democratic President or hates the mission statement
Sarah Ibarruri
Mar 2014
#221
Lobbying (an amoral activity which ensures that the rich and corporations get their favorite lackeys
Paulie
Mar 2014
#224
Are you working to get lobbyists banned from the Congress floor and from writing legislation? nt
Sarah Ibarruri
Mar 2014
#236
Root out the anti-Democrat Third Way and toss 'em, then. Fine with me, most of them are MIC
Zorra
Mar 2014
#225
Did you read the Democratic Underground Mission Statement? It's copied in my OP nt
Sarah Ibarruri
Mar 2014
#230
Like most mission statements, it's supposed to be an objective, not a cudgel.
winter is coming
Mar 2014
#240
Perhaps DU fits them best. You don't get to make that decision for others. n/t
winter is coming
Mar 2014
#260
After we purge the unworthy, we true believers should get some kind of cool uniform.
Throd
Mar 2014
#241
You know, if you don't like the mission statement here, the Internet is VAST! Go looking for
Sarah Ibarruri
Mar 2014
#271
It clearly states what DU's goal is. And trashing the president is against that goal. nt
Sarah Ibarruri
Mar 2014
#292
I can't imagine any progressive person doesn't yearn for the outstanding progressive DU'ers
Judi Lynn
Mar 2014
#253
Excuse me, but I don't think that blindly supporting one man is the same as being progressive
BlueStreak
Mar 2014
#289
And thank you, Judi Lynn, for your analysis of what DU has lost. Many compassionate people are gone.
freshwest
Mar 2014
#301
Yup, right wing rats are in here posing as DUers. But there are also the do-nothing whiners who
Sarah Ibarruri
Mar 2014
#281
Burn the heathens that dare question why. Party before logic and party before things that are right
Nanjing to Seoul
Mar 2014
#283