Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

davidthegnome

(2,983 posts)
17. A fair point.
Fri Mar 28, 2014, 02:09 AM
Mar 2014

There is no group that sits around and says, "Okay, this person can be a democrat and that one can't." There is no true definition or standard to go by to say that someone either is or isn't a democrat - other than simple registration or party membership. We've got a mighty big tent.

I think you underestimate the power of blog sites and forums though. A lot of ideas that take root here do make it pretty well up the chain, and a lot of what we think about and talk about here does have some kind of ripple effect. There are precious few places where you can talk so much about (and read so much about) politics, world events, general ideas and opinions. For the most part, this is now done on the internet, through blog sites and/or forums. The politicians, elected and hopefuls, might be the ones who ultimately write the legislation, but it's ideas and passion like we have here that gets them there.

Also, I'd like to point out that the members of DU are, generally, very "real" voters. We've even had candidates and elected officials here from time to time. We don't decide who is a democrat and who isn't, but we definitely have some level of significance on a grander scale.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

You're saying Joe Lieberman is/was a real Democrat? RC Mar 2014 #1
Yes I do and yes he was... brooklynite Mar 2014 #2
Is a person a Democrat.... ReRe Mar 2014 #16
And what is the purpose of DU? RC Mar 2014 #24
In retrospective, he seems to be slightly Cleita Mar 2014 #7
Don't be Daft psiman Mar 2014 #18
... Cleita Mar 2014 #27
And therein resides the problem. RC Mar 2014 #25
+1 nt steve2470 Mar 2014 #3
Reality, yes ... but don't make further assumptions. frazzled Mar 2014 #4
And she gets a 63/100 on That's My Congress, hardly liberal. joshcryer Mar 2014 #11
Facts and Evidence: I Like That in an Argument psiman Mar 2014 #19
Thanks for that post dreamnightwind Mar 2014 #23
The central premise of the OP is the rejection of labels ... 1000words Mar 2014 #5
Huh? psiman Mar 2014 #20
This reminds me of Jamaal510 Mar 2014 #6
I suspect that those who demand only "real Democrats" hang out here or... TreasonousBastard Mar 2014 #8
I don't think people who insult Obama on DU are interested in "real Democrat" flamingdem Mar 2014 #9
A big "D" Democrat is a member of the Democratic Party in one of these states of the United States. Agnosticsherbet Mar 2014 #10
And it's ratified at the convention, by the delegates we select. joshcryer Mar 2014 #12
Delegates selcted by big "D" Democrats, yes. Members of the party elect the delegates. Agnosticsherbet Mar 2014 #13
Delegates tend to be extremely diverse, too. joshcryer Mar 2014 #14
Ye, it has grown more liberal. Agnosticsherbet Mar 2014 #15
A fair point. davidthegnome Mar 2014 #17
Yes, the term Democrat is amorphous. DeSwiss Mar 2014 #21
The real and imaginary complex domain of politics polynomial Mar 2014 #22
Both of my Senators are more liberal than Warren. Why is she your standard for 'as liberal Bluenorthwest Mar 2014 #26
She's not my "standard"... brooklynite Mar 2014 #28
Ah I mistakenly took your OP at face value, as being about election of Democrats Bluenorthwest Mar 2014 #31
What's your point? polichick Mar 2014 #29
I'm a Democrat because: lumberjack_jeff Mar 2014 #30
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Allow me to inject some r...»Reply #17